Tuesday, July 21, 2009

The rise of gangs in the US military

The rise of gangs in the US military

http://www.thecommentfactory.com/irregular-army-the-rise-of-gangs-in-the-us-military-2297

By Matt Kennard
July 17, 2009

Gang-bangers know a lot about war – it's their raison d'être. But
until the 'war on terror' that expertise had never wholesale shifted
from the inner city to the U.S. military, from South Central to Baghdad.

According to the FBI's own National Gang Intelligence report,
released in January 2006, "Gang-related activity in the military is
increasing and poses a threat to law enforcement officials and
national security."

FBI gang investigator Jennifer Simon told Stars and Stripes, "It's no
secret that gang members are
prevalent in the armed forces, including internationally." She said
gang member had been documented on or near U.S. military bases in
Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea and Iraq.

In Iraq it's not uncommon to see armored vehicles, concrete
barricades and bathroom walls serving as canvasses for gang graffiti.
Signs like "GDN" for Gangster Disciple along with the gang's six-pointed star.

The U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command reported 61 gang
investigations and incidents in 2006, compared to just 9 in 2004.
Some experts say that up to 2 percent of soldiers on active duty –
that's 20,000 – are members of a gang.

Scott Barfield is a former Defense Department gang detective. He told
the Chicago Sun-Times that he had identified more than 300 soldiers
at the base (what base?) as gang members. "I think that's the tip of
the iceberg," he said. "It's often in the military's best interest to
keep these incidents quiet, given low recruitment numbers and recent
negative publicity. The relaxation of recruiting standards, recruiter
misconduct and the military's lack of enforcement (gang membership is
not prohibited in the Army) have compounded the problem and allowed
gang member presence in the military to proliferate."

One infamous case of gang-related crimes in the U.S. Army took place
in Germany on the night of July 3 2005 when Sgt. Juwan Johnson was
battered to death by eight other soldiers as part of the initiation
rights in the 'Gangster Disciples'.

"I feel like I didn't prepare him enough to deal with this and I
should have," his mother said. "But how would I have known there were
gangs in the military? I could have had that talk with him."
A report in 2006 surfaced that a Marine reservist and Maniac Latin
Disciple gang member who had been in Iraq was being charged with
attempted murder in the shooting of three teenagers in Aurora, Ill.

The FBI report explicitly warns of this future saying that while
allowing gang members to service in the military may temporarily help
meet recruitment goals, U.S. communities will be faced with violence
and disruption as the soldiers return home to the inner-city streets.
Even while serving, a Milwaukee police detective tells the San
Francisco Chronicle, "Gang members are going over to Iraq and sending
weapons back."

The military itself recognizes it should have more of a handle on it.
"If we weren't in the middle of fighting a war, yes, I think the
military would have a lot control over this issue," said Hunter
Glass, a retired police detective in Fayetteville, North Caroline,
the home of Ft. Bragg and the 82nd Airborne. "But with a war going
on, I think it's very difficult to do."

The situation had got so bad in 2008 that when the military planned
to transfer 10,000 troops to Fort Bliss, Texas, the FBI feared a turf
war between "members of the FolkNation gang… [and] a criminal group
that is already well-established in the area, Barrio Azteca." The New
York Sun quoted an FBI agent as saying, "FolkNation, which was
founded in Chicago and includes several branches using the name
Gangster Disciples, has gained a foothold in the Army."

There have also been numerous reports of recruiters trying to cover
up the history of gang-members. In 2005 a Latin King member was
allegedly recruited into the Army at a Brooklyn, NY, courthouse,
while awaiting trial for assaulting a police officer. He was
allegedly told to conceal his gang affiliation, according to
journalist Rod Powers.

The reasons for gangs joining up are according to the FBI twofold;
first, some may enlist to escape their gang lifestyle. But more
plausibly members enlist to receive weapons, combat and convoy
support training; to get access to weapons and explosives, or as an
alternative to incarceration (gang-members have been offered clemency
in exchange for service). The 'moral waivers' being granted to felons
and other criminals undoubtedly compound the problem.

.

Playing war

[See URL for photos.]

Playing war

http://www.creativereview.co.uk/cr-blog/2009/july1/playing-war

by Patrick Burgoyne
9 July 2009

Like most boys my age, I spent a good deal of my childhood playing
war. So why do I find these Matchbox ads so troubling?

The campaign comes from Ogilvy & Mather Singapore and has just been
uploaded to our Feed section by the agency. The three ads each depict
a young boy in charge of some military hardware: a tank (above),
fighter jet or helicopter.

Perhaps it's the exhausted, dull-eyed look on the boy's faces that
does it, or the fact that war in these times of Iraq and Afghanistan
and dozens of other regional conflicts, is very real and very deadly.
Or maybe it's just that I'm a grown-up with a son of my own. But the
last thing these ads make me want to do is go out and buy toys that
would encourage my son to see himself in the same situations as depicted here.

.

Right-wing extremist beware - you may not be able to join military

Right-wing extremist beware - you may not be able to join military

http://www.examiner.com/x-10317-San-Diego-County-Political-Buzz-Examiner~y2009m7d14-Rightwing-extremist-beware--you-may-not-be-able-to-join-military

July 14, 2009
by Kimberly Dvorak

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 includes
some language that could prevent right-wing extremists from entering
the military and serving their country.

The meat of the bill is to authorize appropriations for 2010 military
activities of the Department of Defense.

While, much of the bill refers to construction, prescribing military
personnel strengths, special pay and allowances to certain members of
the Armed Forces, including benefits for disabled military retirees.

The brouhaha over HR 2647 is the language stemming from the first
Department of Homeland Security report on right-wing extremists.

The DHS list included border patrol groups who don't believe in open
borders or religious groups that don't believe in abortion as well as
other perceived-anti government organizations.

The vague language contained in the bill gives authority to the
Attorney General to determine what groups are seen as 'extremist,'
however, tea party groups and border patrol groups feel this is
directly targeted at them.

"Think of anything you or someone you know may have said in an email
or online that may be construed to support, encourage or affirm a
government idea that you could have agreed with an extremist's views
and goals, they or their children could be prohibited from joining
the military," said one Patriot group who wished to remain anonymous.

They also insisted that if you believe in the Constitution of the
United States and stand up for it you may not be able to serve in the
military, however if you belong to any far-left group, you'll be fine.

All patriot groups encourage voters to check out this bill as it
heads to the Senate for the final vote and contact their Senators
with questions and concerns.

.

Monday, July 20, 2009

Army Guard On Course to Reach End-strength Goal

Army Guard On Course to Reach End-strength Goal

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=55088

By Army Staff Sgt. S. Patrick McCollum
Special to American Forces Press Service

ARLINGTON, Va., July 10, 2009 – The Army National Guard is changing
recruiting policies to lower its end strength by the end of the
fiscal year, Guard officials said today.

These changes will enable the Army Guard to decrease its end strength
from 362,493 soldiers to a congressionally mandated force of 358,200
by Sept. 30.

"When you go from a growth mode to a contraction mode, it takes six
to eight months to get everybody to move towards reduction," said
Col. Michael Jones, commander of Army National Guard Strength Command.

The Army National Guard implemented many recruiting initiatives to
grow from 330,000 in June 2005 to more than 362,000 in 2008.
Increasing bonuses and the number of recruiters, and programs such as
the Guard Recruiting Assistance Program, or G-RAP, which pays $1,000
to Guard members for referring someone who enlists and $1,000 when
that person ships to basic training, made the difference.

The Army Guard grew by 18,800 members over two fiscal years, an
unprecedented growth for any Defense Department component since the
draft era, Jones said. For the first time in history, the Army Guard
had achieved more total end strength than all other Defense
Department components combined.

To adjust this year, the Army Guard is making changes that will
affect both soldiers coming into the Guard and those transitioning out.

"We're tightening up the criteria it takes to qualify to come into
the National Guard," Jones said. For those enlisting in the Army
Guard, the maximum enlistment age is being lowered to 35 from 42.
Medical and bad-conduct waivers will not be granted to new enlistees,
and enlistment and retention bonuses will be eliminated for all
soldiers currently not serving in Iraq or Afghanistan.

The Army Guard also is making it easier for soldiers to leave. "The
discharge process was a little bit cumbersome and a little bit
lengthy, so we've streamlined that," Jones said.

Finally, soldiers who fail to ship to basic training within 12 months
will be discharged.

"We need to have [soldiers] qualified now," Jones said. "If they
can't get qualified now, we need to move them out of our end strength."

Even in a scaled-back recruiting environment, however, some highly
sought-after vacancies need to be filled. The Army Guard will shift
its focus to officer and warrant officer recruiting and encourage
current enlisted members to consider these options.

These measures have had the desired effect on end strength. For the
past 12 weeks, the Army Guard's end strength has steadily declined by
about 500 soldiers a week. The trend has Jones feeling optimistic
about reaching the goal. "We'll get to 358,000," he said. "Not a problem."

Defense Department officials announced overall recruiting numbers for
June today. The Army National Guard fell short of its mark,
recruiting 84 percent of its goal to add 3,209 soldiers, while the
Air National Guard had 867 accessions with a goal of 810, for 107 percent.

.

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Military Recruiters Caught Lying - on Tape

Military Recruiters Caught Lying - on Tape

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/7/9/751882/-Military-Recruiters-Caught-Lyingon-Tape

by samdiener
Thu Jul 09, 2009

Military recruiters have a quota, or what they call a "mission,"
specifying how many people they're expected to enlist each month.
When they don't reach their quotas, they're often pressured
intensely, ordered to work overtime, and threatened with
career-ending consequences. Not all recruiters lie, but lies by
military recruiters aren't the exception, they're common. ABC in New
York, for example, sent hidden cameras into recruiting stations in
2006 and found 5 of 10 recruiters they taped lied on camera (see item
10 below).

See 16 videos of military recruiters caught in the act of lying below
the fold. Peace advocates have a right and responsibility to gain
equal access to schools to counter militarist propaganda. Educators
have a legal and ethical responsibility to insure alternative voices are heard.

After all, how many recruiters could provide full disclosure about
the horrors of war, the psychologically devastating costs of killing,
or the nature of military life (How would you like to get ordered
around 24-7?), and still meet their quota? I hope this helps explain
some of the the motives of the military recruiters caught on tape lying below.

These abuses also aren't new. There was a Beard Commission report
which documented widespread military recruiter abuses back in the
late 1970s. Every time the corporate media, the GAO, or Congress does
another perfunctory investigation, for decades the Pentagon has
repeated the same lies: you found a few rotten apples, we're
investigating abuses, we're implementing new policies designed to
root out abuses. But the system of pressuring military recruiters to
make "mission" continues.

Even when military recruiters don't overtly lie, I still oppose both
the specific wars they're recruiting for and object to organizing
people to kill other people on principle. One fact only a very rare
recruiter mentions before they have the recruits' signature on the
enlistment papers: once a person takes the oath at the Military
Entrance Processing Station on the day they ship off to boot-camp,
the military's a job that is illegal to quit - and it can be very
difficult, and sometimes virtually impossible, to obtain a discharge.

When people in the military who are now in crisis call me [I
volunteer with the GI Rights Hotline (www.girightshotline.org,
877-447-4487)] and tell me about the lies their recruiter told them
in order to induce them to sign up, or to illegally coerce them to go
to basic training even though they had second thoughts while in the
Delayed Entry Program (see items #2 and #15, for example), I'm
reminded of the costs, in sheer human misery, of both military
recruiting abuses specifically and preparing for and fighting wars in general.

List compiled by Sam Diener, Peacework Magazine
(www.peaceworkmagazine.org) Co-Editor, 2009-06.
--

Please help us add to this list by pointing to additional links in
the comments.

1. David Martin, "Army Recruiter Used Scare Tactics - CBS News
National," CBS Evening News, July 28, 2008,
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/28/eveningnews/main4301305.shtml?source=mostpop_story

2. "Army Recruiter: "Join the Army, or go to Jail!" - video," Channel
11 news, January 29, 2009, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXx9nJzOCaU

3. "Army Recruiters Tell Applicant to Lie and Cheat - video,"
December 5, 2006,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkHTYfqwooE&feature=PlayList&p=99C9EF2BAC327C37&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=41

4. "Army Recruiting Investigation by WTVF - Video," August 20, 2007,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuoMkuY3yAM

5. Mark Greenblatt, "Caught on tape: Army recruiters threaten high
school students video," KHOU Houston, Texas, July 29, 2008,
http://www.khou.com/topstories/stories/khou080728_tnt_armyrecruiters.eb16366.html

6. "Hidden camera catches Army recruiter - Video," February 16, 2007,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BFNKzmqHjs&feature=PlayList&p=458A919BA7EFFD72&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=29

7. "Hidden Cameras Catch Army Recruiters In Bad Position - Video,"
January 9, 2008,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbFPaknBOgQ&feature=related

8. "Racist, Homophobic Military Recruiter Still Army Strong," Channel
2 news, Jersey City, NJ,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyMf7wj8Hyk&feature=related

9. "How Far Will Army Recruiters Go? - Video," Denver CBS affiliate
KCNC, May 2, 2005,
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/05/02/eveningnews/main692497.shtml

See also transcripts at "Army Recruiters Face Investigation, Caught
On Tape: Recruiters Seemingly Helping 'Prospect' Lie - transcript,"
CBS Early Show, May 2, 2005,
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/05/02/earlyshow/main692361.shtml

and "How Far Will Army Recruiters Go?" Denver CBS affiliate KCNC, May
2, 2005, http://www.quakerhouse.org/Recruiter-Abuses-07.htm

10. "Military Recruitment Abuses Uncovered NY WABC Undercover
Investigation of 10 Recruiters - at least 5 Lied video," November 3, 2006,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZntDHh_lTk&feature=related
(Text article about this video is at: "Army Recruiters Accused of
Misleading Students to Get Them to Enlist - report on Military
Recruitment Abuses Uncovered NY WABC Undercover Investigation of 10
Recruiters - at least 5 Lied," November 3, 2006,
http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=2626032

11. "Recruiter Abuses transcript," Atlanta Fox TV WAGA, November 8,
1999, http://quakerhouse.org/Recruiter-Abuses-06.htm

12. "Recruiter Caught Lying - video," Channel 5 Brownsville, TX,
September 14, 2008, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQj4MMXmrXg&feature=related

13. Michael Moore, "Recruiters Lie to Kids at Malls to Fill Quotas -
Video," www.michaelmoore.com, February 20, 2007,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQDAxoXjOGw&feature=PlayList&p=99C9EF2BAC327C37&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=40

14. Jackie McLean, "Recruiters Lie: Video Fox 9 Minneapolis," Fox 9
Twin Cities, May 13, 2008, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcSf_Ygp-BU

15a. "Army Recruiter threatens student with Jail-1/5 video,"
Democracy Now, August 7, 2008,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RgQYDQIT3o&feature=related

15b. "Army Recruiter threatens student with Jail-2/5 - video,"
Democracy Now, August 7, 2008,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwUQyfzzbMA&feature=related

15c. "Army Recruiter threatens student with Jail-3/5 - video,"
Democracy Now, August 7, 2008,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xExuW67n3WQ&feature=related

15d. "Army Recruiter threatens student with Jail-4/5 - video,"
Democracy Now, August 7, 2008,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W24WxrDMxvE&feature=related

15e. "Army Recruiter threatens student with Jail-5/5 - video,"
Democracy Now, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBiOnvkt4PE&NR=1

16. "Recruiter Sex (sic) Scandal" (A report on military recruiters
raping potential enlistees). CNN, September 30, 2006,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6q1RNPk06cI&feature=PlayList&p=1F046E8B577D0CF0&index=26

17. "Recruiter-Abuses - A collection of links to articles," Quaker House NC,
http://quakerhouse.org/Recruiter-Abuses-Intro.htm

Please help us add to this list by pointing to additional links in
the comments.

A version of this diary originally was posted to the blog at
http://www.peaceworkmagazine.org/blog/military-recruiting-abuses-tape-embedded-video.

Military recruiter's presence in public schools is pervasive.
Congress mandated that military recruiters be given access to
students in the No Child Left Behind Act. The Armed Services
Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) test is a trojan horse
administered in over 12,000 schools to over 600,000 students per
year. The results are routinely given to military recruiters who use
the data to make targeted pitches to students. The military runs over
3300 high school JROTC programs in high schools across the country.

Yet, where recruiters are speaking to students, we have a legal right
and a responsibility to make sure students hear alternative points of
view: about the systematic lies of military recruiters, the realities
of military life, the horrors of war, the psychological and ethical
cost of carrying out orders to kill, and the efficacy and ethics of
nonviolent action. Insuring equal access for peace advocates makes it
possible for students to hear alternative points of view, counter
years of cultural militarism, and make more informed decisions for
themselves. It is incumbent upon educators that we expose students to
multiple points of view about controversial issues in order to
promote critical thinking and engaged democratic participation.

Hundreds of activists concerned and active about these issues will
attend theNational Network Opposed to the Militarization of Youth
http://www.nnomy.org/ conference in Chicago July 17-19.

.

Army the tie that binds for cadets

Army the tie that binds for cadets

http://www.onlineathens.com/stories/071109/new_461997297.shtml

Students learn the ropes in Winder-Barrow military program

By Ryan Blackburn
ryan.blackburn@onlineathens.com
7/11/2009

WINDER - While other teenagers are savoring the waning days of summer
break, a gung-ho group of 20 Winder-Barrow High School students ran
laps, did push-ups and tried to master knot-tying, a skill they'll
need as the first members of the school's new National Army Cadet
Corps program.

"We're catching on pretty quickly," said Brett Downing, a rising
junior and one of the 400 students who will take cadet classes
offered this year at both Winder-Barrow and Apalachee high schools.
"I was pretty surprised."

During his first two years at Winder-Barrow, Brett urged principals
and school board members to consider adding a cadet program like
other schools in the state have had for years.

He wants someday to fly a jet in the Air Force, and having a
military-focused class will give him a head start and a sense of belonging.

"To me, it's just like one big family," Brett said.

After dozens of e-mail requests, petitions and surveys that Brett
asked fellow students to complete, the Barrow County Board of
Education approved the cadet corps program in April, setting aside
$338,000 to fund the classes, including two instructors' salaries and
benefits, equipment and uniforms for 300 pre-registered students.

"When I found out that we got it, I was basically screaming and
hollering," Brett said. "The board of education put up such a fight
with it because they weren't sure the funding was there."

School board members wanted assurance that the Army would offset some
of the cost of the program - as the military does for Junior Reserve
Officers Training Corps (JROTC) programs - and didn't get that
guarantee. But with so many interested students, the Army may soon
pick up part of the tab, said Maj. Tom Evans, an instructor at Winder-Barrow.

Most schools that apply for JROTC funding must submit to a year-long
evaluation, but the new Winder program is high up on a list of
requests, Evans said.

"We have done everything we needed to do to satisfy (the Army's)
requirements," Evans said. "It's more a matter now of them making a
budgetary decision."

To keep the program eligible for the Army funds, the school district
must register at least 10 percent of both Winder-Barrow and Apalachee
students and meet with JROTC administrators to make sure instructors
deliver the curriculum appropriately, he said.

JROTC can reach students who don't go for other traditional
extracurricular activities like football and band, Principal Al Darby said.

"This is something I feel our county, our school system, has needed
for the past 20 years," Darby said. "Now we'll be able to make even
more of an impact on a wider variety of kids than any other program we have."

JROTC students aren't obligated to enlist after they graduate, but
may enlist to take advantage of military programs that pay tuition,
board and other expenses for college students in exchange for a tour of duty.

And they leave high school with leadership, problem-solving and other
skills employers are always looking for, Evans said.

"I think what some people get caught up in is that it's a (military)
recruitment tool. That's absolutely not what this is about," he said.

While they have not yet worn their uniforms, Brett and other cadets
are planning to make a big debut at a football game to show off their pride.

"Just the whole brigade coming onto the field, it'll be like 'Boom.
This is who we are and what we've become,' " he said.

.

Free legal work fuels Youth Protection Act appeals

Free legal work fuels Youth Protection Act appeals

http://www.contracostatimes.com/california/ci_12824829?nclick_check=1

Thadeus Greenson/The Times-Standard
Posted: 07/13/2009

Apparently, it takes more than a federal judge to scare off Eureka and Arcata.

Both cities voted this month to continue mounting a defense of the
cities' twin Youth Protection Acts after a federal judge ruled the
voter-approved measures to be null and void and prohibited the cities
from enforcing them. The measures aimed to prohibit the military
recruitment of minors within city limits.

Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong's ruling seemingly left little gray
area, finding that the ordinances violated the Supremacy Clause of
the U.S. Constitution by seeking to subject the federal government to
local control. Further, Armstrong found that the cities hadn't shown
any injury by the government's purported recruiting violations, and
instead leaned on media reports alleging abuses by military
recruiters elsewhere.

But, undeterred, both the Arcata and Eureka city councils recently
voted to continue defending the measures, clearing the way for
attorneys to work on an appeal to the court's ruling. The councils
knew that most experts agree their cities don't stand much of a
chance, if any at all, of prevailing in court, but the councils
decided to forge ahead anyway, largely because a number of San
Francisco Bay Area law firms are giving them virtual mountains of pro
bono legal work on the case.

"Why wouldn't we appeal?" Eureka City Councilman Jeff Leonard said of
the council's unanimous decision to move forward. "There is no
additional liability or no additional costs involved with our going
forward at this point."

Eureka City Attorney Sheryl Schaffner said pro bono attorneys --
primarily Brad Yamauchi of the San Francisco firm Minami and Tamaki
-- have done nearly all the work on the case.

"So far, my total expense has been a couple of phone calls,"
Schaffner said, adding that she hasn't spent more than 10 or 15 hours
of her time working on the case in recent months.

Perhaps surprisingly, the decision to move forward was more
contentious in Arcata, where the measure garnered more voter support.
Mayor Mark Wheetley said the matter came to a split vote, with three
councilmembers voting to move ahead with the appeal and Wheetley and
councilmember Michael Winkler voting in favor of the city cutting its losses.

Wheetley said his reasoning for the vote was simple, and strictly financial.

In part because Arcata has a different structure than Eureka, the
city has already shelled out more than $7,000 defending the act,
according to Wheetley. While Schaffner is a full-time employee of
Eureka, Arcata has a different situation with its city attorney,
Nancy Diamond.

Instead of being on salary, Wheetley said Arcata pays Diamond hourly
for the work she does on behalf of the city.

"Every hour she spends (working on the case) is a billable hour,"
Wheetley said.

While Wheetley felt it was financially irresponsible to enter into an
open-ended defense of the Youth Protection Act while the city is
facing tight financial times, a majority of his colleagues disagreed.

Councilman Shane Brinton said he voted to continue defending the act
both to stand up for the will of the city's voters and because he
thinks the issue is important.

"This is really a test case and we really need to push forward and
get some answers," Brinton said. "There are very qualified attorneys
interested in helping us and, to me, that says a lot about the
strength of our argument."

Yamauchi agrees that there are strong arguments to be made, but said
in a previous interview with the Times-Standard that he's not
entirely optimistic about the Youth Protection Act's chances. But, he
said that even in defeat, there are important things that can be learned.

How the court responds to the hearings, Yamauchi said, can offer
important information about the strengths and weaknesses of the
arguments for the measures. Similarly, Yamauchi said the courts'
decisions and rulings can also help people craft similar military
recruiting ballot measures in the future that might stand a better
chance of holding up to legal challenges. Consequently, he said he is
ready to appeal the case all the way to the Supreme Court.

Dave Meserve, the primary proponent of the twin acts, said he's very
happy that both cities have agreed to move forward with the appeal
process, and said his newly dubbed Stop Recruiting Kids Coalition is
starting a fundraising campaign to reimburse Eureka and Arcata for
any out-of-pocket expenses they have incurred.

"Our intention is that it costs the city little or nothing to defend
these measures," Meserve said. "We understand very clearly that these
are tough financial times and no one wants to throw money at legal
representation."
--

Thadeus Greenson can be reached at 441-0509 or tgreenson@times-standard.com.

.

Military is attractive option in bad economy

Military is attractive option in bad economy

http://www.newsherald.com/articles/class-75732-bodycopyjustified-economy.html

July 13, 2009
By DANIEL CARSON / News Herald Writer

Prospective Air Force recruits come from all walks of life and want
to enlist for a variety of reasons, said Panama City Air Force
recruiter Technical Sgt. Bryan Scott.

During this recession, more recruits are citing the ailing economy as
a reason to enlist in the Air Force or other military branches, with
recruiters like Scott hearing more stories of people affected by the
stagnant economy in recent months.

"If they need a job, we have a job," Scott said, as he sat behind the
desk at the Army's 23rd Street office.

Scott said he has worked in the Air Force's Panama City recruiting
office since January.

While most of his applicants are in the 17-19 age range, he is seeing
more men and women in their 20s who were laid off or want a more stable income.

Applicants' individual economic struggles often come up during
conversation, he said.

"If their reason for coming in here is the economy, that's how we'll
go with it," Scott said.

Bay County's unemployment rate peaked at 10 percent in January 2009,
with the county recording an 8.6 percent unemployment rate in May.

Florida produced a seasonally adjusted May unemployment rate of 10.2
percent, the highest jobless level recorded in Florida since October 1975.

Sgt. Galen Waddell of the U.S. Army's Panama City recruiting station
said he and his station commander have also increasingly heard from
more potential recruits about the down economy and lack of area job
opportunities.

"The economy is running them into our door," Waddell said.

Waddell has worked at the Army's Panama City office since November 2008.

The Army requires a high school diploma for enlisted recruits,
Waddell said, a requirement that has disqualified some people who
have walked into the Panama City recruiting office.

Mack Bazzell, chief of advertising and public relations for the
Montgomery, Ala.-based U.S. Army Recruiting Battalion, said that the
Panama City office enlisted 87 recruits during a period stretching
from October 2007 to June 2008.

The station's goal was to enlist 86 recruits during that time period,
Bazzell said.

From October 2008 to June 2009, the Panama City Army recruiting
office enlisted 90 recruits and eclipsed its goal of 84, he said.

Bazzell said the area his office recruits in, which includes the
Florida Panhandle, has always been filled with people who wanted to
serve in the Army or other services.

He said this was true even during wartime.

"We've always been very close to making our goal or exceeding our
goal," Bazzell said.

Waddell said that when he served as an Army recruiter in Jasper,
Ala., military recruiting required a lot more driving to find
potential recruits.

"Here in Panama City, I sit in the office from 8 to 5 o'clock and I
hardly get time to go eat lunch. It's always busy," Waddell said.

Sgt. John Lawson of the U.S. Marine Corps Recruiting
Station-Jacksonville said his office is the parent command for 13
recruiting substations in South Georgia, part of South Carolina, and
North Florida, including the Panama City substation.

The Panama City substation covers an area that includes Bay, Calhoun,
Gulf, Jackson, Holmes, Washington and Walton counties.

Lawson said that, for Fiscal Year 2009 (which runs from Oct. 1,
2008-Sept. 30, 2009), the Panama City substation set a goal of 46
recruits and had shipped 33 recruits to Paris Island, S.C., as of
Wednesday, about 70 percent of the substation's fiscal year goal.

A Congressional mandate called for the Marine Corps to expand to
202,000 active duty troops by fiscal year 2011, Lawson said.

He said that, through aggressive recruitment and retention
nationwide, the Marines were well positioned to meet that mandate.

Lawson said the downturned economy hadn't had as much impact on
Marine recruiting as it may have had on other military branches.

"If anything, it's allowed us to be more selective in who we
recruit," Lawson said.

.

Parents Can Withhold Kids' Info From Military Recruiters

School Districts Reminded:
Parents Can Withhold Kids' Info From Military Recruiters

http://nebraska.statepaper.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2009/07/17/4a60ab2e5e1a3

July 17, 2009

The ACLU has reminded every Nebraska school district of the privacy
rights of students, including parents' rights, under federal law, to
make sure information about their children doesn't go to military recruiters.

ACLU Nebraska said the notification to school districts followed
complaints from parents that their children's privacy rights weren't
be honored by schools.

Federal law "protects the privacy rights of students so that their
information cannot be disclosed outside the school," the ACLU said in
a news release, but the No Child Left Behind law simultaneously
requires schools to give student contact information to military recruiters."

"Even though schools must comply with No Child Left Behind, parents
still have the right to opt out of the information transfer," said
ACLU Nebraska Legal Director Amy Miller. "The schools have an
obligation to alert parents to their privacy rights, since many
families have a serious objection to receiving military recruitment calls."

One parent in Lincoln, for example, filled out the 'opt out' form for
Lincoln Public Schools. The parent told the ACLU: "It was difficult
to find the information about opting out in the district handbook for
parents. I finally found it buried on page 39. According to the
handbook it is the parents' responsibility to take the initiative to
request the opt out forms from the school. There were no forms in the
handbook. After several inquiries from the military including phone
calls to my child, I made arrangements to speak directly with one of
the recruiters. They confirmed that they had my child's name, phone
number, and address on a list provided by the Central Administration
office of LPS. I don't know how this happened and I am deeply
concerned not only that it happened to my child but possibly to others."

Miller said such reports prompted the ACLU to remind school
administrators statewide "that the law requires them to honor
parents' desire to protect student privacy."

The letter gives school districts an outline of their obligations
which are part of federal law.

"Not every school district is a problem. Many Nebraska schools take
affirmative steps to send a letter to each family, describing their
rights to opt out," Miller said. "Those schools are a good model for
others such as the Lincoln Public School District, where the opt out
form is not affirmatively provided to families."

Miller said the ACLU is encouraging "any families who have had a
privacy violation occur at their school to contact us so we can
review their case with them."

Here is the text of the letter sent by the ACLU to school districts:
Dear School Administrator:

Since the fall semester is approaching, we write to provide you with
accurate information about your obligations when it comes to military
recruiting and to inform you of various options available to you and
your staff to protect the privacy interests of your students. We also
are available to answer questions or to provide you with additional
assistance.

As you presumably know, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires
school districts to take certain actions with respect to efforts by
the United States military to recruit high-school students.

1. Schools Cannot Release Any Information Before Offering Students
and Families the Opportunity to Object- Prior to any disclosure of
directory information under NCLB, a school must advise students and
their parents that they may object to the disclosure of directory
information without written parental consent and the school may not
release student directory information if the student or parent objects.

2. Schools Cannot Release Information about Former Students- NCLB
does not authorize the release of directory information except with
respect to those students who are currently enrolled in your high school.

3. Schools Cannot Release Information about any Student Who Is Not a
Senior or Junior- The U.S. Department of Education and the U.S.
Department of Defense have restricted NCLB military recruiter access
to information concerning only those students who are seventeen years
of age or older or are in the eleventh grade or higher.

4. Schools Cannot Release Students E-mail addresses, Ages or
Birthdates- NCLB permits military recruiter access only to student
names, addresses and telephone numbers.

5. Schools Are Not Required by the Statutes to Employ an "Opt-Out"
Procedure- Though many schools have chosen an "opt-out" approach to
military recruitment, some have implemented ""opt-in"" procedures.
The ACLU Nebraska believes that the laws permit school personnel to
choose either procedure. Whether it chooses an "opt-in" or an
"opt-out" procedure, every school must notify students and/or parents
of their rights and give them the opportunity either to permit or to
block disclosure of student directory information to military
recruiters. The school must then compile the positive responses and
give the information to the arm of the military that has requested
it. As long as the school provides a list of names, addresses and
phone numbers to the military, it is in compliance with ACLU Nebraska.

6. Schools Are Not Required to Adopt an "All or Nothing" Approach to
Disclosure of Student Directory Information- Federal law requires
only that parents and students be given the opportunity to withhold
their information from military recruiters and does not address the
issue of disclosing student directory information to any other third
party -- including colleges. Accordingly, even schools employing
opt-out procedures can and should allow students to opt-out of only
military recruiting.

7. Schools Must Allow a Reasonable Amount of Time to Respond -
Schools should respond within a reasonable time that permits notice
and exercise of students' and parents' rights to opt into or out of
disclosure. The ACLU Nebraska urges you to protect the privacy of
your students by setting up user-friendly procedures that notify
students and their families of their rights under NCLB and makes it
easy for them to control the disclosure of their student directory
information. The following measures would go a long way towards
accomplishing these goals:

8. Students May Opt Out, Not Just Parents - Students should be
notified that students, as well as their parents, can choose to
withhold their contact information from recruiters without prior
written parental consent. Simple forms can be distributed for
students to fill out in class. Students should also be given forms to
bring home to a parent.

Parents report that they find it most effective if they are sent an
actual form to advise them of their privacy rights. We urge you to
affirmatively provide the information to parents in a manner that is
designed to draw attention to their rights rather than simply
"burying" the information. A sample form is included with this letter
as a model.

Finally, I should advise you that a school that releases private
student information against the wishes of a parent who has completed
an "opt out" form runs the risk of liability under both civil rights
and tort law. Therefore, we strongly encourage you to review
procedures to ensure that the information conveyed to military
recruiters is limited as described above and omits all families who
have requested an "opt out."

Please feel free to contact us if you have questions.

.

Friday, July 17, 2009

Link between combat stress and murder

"They felt naked without a weapon"

http://www.salon.com/news/primary_sources/2009/07/16/fort_carson_report/index.html


Read excerpts from the Army report that shows a link between combat
stress and murder

Editor's note: Download the Army's full report on homicides at Fort
Carson here.
http://www.armymedicine.army.mil/reports/FinalRedactedEpiconReport14July2009.pdf
Read about the Army's spin on the report here. Read Salon's Coming
Home series about preventable deaths at Fort Carson here.
http://dir.salon.com/topics/coming_home/

--------

The Army denies that combat stress causes homicide

http://www.salon.com/news/special/coming_home/2009/07/16/fort_carson_report/index.html


An Army report seems to confirm a Salon investigation linking battle
stress to murder. But the Army begs to differ

Thursday, July 16, 2009

The rise of alcoholism and drug abuse in the US military

The rise of alcoholism and drug abuse in the US military

http://www.thecommentfactory.com/irregular-army-the-rise-of-alcoholism-and-drug-abuse-in-the-us-military-2285

By Matt Kennard
July 11, 2009

The twin vices of drug addiction and alcoholism were rampant in the
U.S. military during the Vietnam war and through movies like
Apocalypse Now and Platoon became the emblematic image of the armed
forces during that war. But figures shows that by the end 2005, of
the 104,000 who had sought medical help after serving in the wars in
Iraq and Afghanistan, 32,010 were suffering from posttraumatic stress
disorder, depression, drug addiction or alcoholism. Proportionally,
that's three times as many as those who returned from Vietnam.

There hasn't been the same media coverage of the problem in the 'war
on terror', but in Iraq and Afghanistan the situation, according to
many, is equally dire, some say worse. Alcohol and drug-related
charges were involved in a third of all Army criminal prosecutions of
soldiers in the two countries in 2006. 240 of the 655 cases resulted
in convictions, and alcohol-related crimes have increased each year since 2004.

A Pentagon health study found that the rate of binge drinking in the
Army shot up by 30 percent from 2002 to 2005, and, they concluded,
that 'may signal an increasing pattern of heavy alcohol use in the
Army'. On top of this, for the first time since 1985, more than a
quarter of all Army members asked said they regularly drink heavily,
which is defined as five or more drinks at one time.

3,057 veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars were diagnosed with
potential drug dependency from 2005 to 2007, according the Veteran
Health Authority. From 2002 through 2004 only 277 veterans were
diagnosed with a drug dependency.

'It's very serious', Lynn Pahland, a director in the Pentagon's
Health Affairs office, told the New York Times. "It's a huge concern".

But despite this surge in drug and alcohol use, spending on programs
in the military to reduce alcohol abuse, smoking and obesity dropped
from 12.6 million in 2005 to $7.74 million in 2006. A 39 percent decline.

One of the biggest problems remains the same as in 'Nam: easy access.
In Iraq it is also easy to get your hands on what the troops call
'haji juice' or 'haji hooch' which is local made 90 percent proof
whiskey. These are often combined with amphetamines that are provided
by medical staff to keep troops alert on missions.

In Afghanistan, many soldiers are getting hooked on heroin even as
the Bush administration gives lip service to combating the poppy
harvests. The Veterans Authority is the world's largest provider of
substance abuse services, looking after 350,000 veterans per year,
and of those 30,000 are being treated for opiate addiction.

This drug addiction and alcoholism is not just a tragedy for the
individuals involved, but for the local populations who have been the
target of drunk and high soldiers committing atrocities. The Haditha
massacre in March 2006, which saw a group of soldiers from 101st
Airborne Division rape a 14-year-old girl and kill her and her
family, took place after the group had drunk several cans of locally
made whiskey.

The prevalence of drugs and drink can end tragically for other the
addict's colleagues too. In late 2004, Specialist Chris Rola, of the
Third Infantry Division, after drinking a stash of whiskey and gin,
pulled his pistol on another soldier and killed him. And things often
get worse when they get back to the U.S. "Lots of soldiers coming
back from Iraq have been using drugs," Specialist William Swenson,
who was deployed to Iraq, told ABC News. "Right when we got back
there were people using cocaine in the barracks, there were people
smoking marijuana at strip clubs; one guy started shooting up."

.

The rise of the old and young in the US military

The rise of the old and young in the US military

http://www.thecommentfactory.com/irregular-army-the-old-and-young-2282

By Matt Kennard
July 8, 2009

Clint Eastwood looked poised on screen with a gun in his hand even as
his hair grayed and his skin wrinkled, but it is unclear if that can
be duplicated in real life combat, although the U.S. military is
giving it a try. During the 'war on terror' it raised the traditional
age limit for new recruits from 35 to 42 to give grandpa a chance to
stop telling his Gulf War I stories to the grandkids and go to join
Gulf War II. With the deluge of overweight people, adding the aged to
ranks, has given the armed forces an even more visceral facelift.
1,460 people in 2006 had taken advantage of the extension of the age limit.

11.4% of those older recruits washed out of the Army before serving
one year, compared with 6.5% of all recruits, Army records show.

The Associated Press reported on Sharon Samuel, a Trinidad native who
was moved by the War on Terror to serve her country. The problem?
She's 40-years old. "I wanted to serve. I wanted to give back," she
said. "I have felt New Yorkers pain." In 2006 she got a second chance
when the army increased its maximum enlistment age to 42 and off she
went to Fort Lee near Richmond for training.

"The overall population that you're talking about is minuscule, but
what we're gaining in terms of experience and maturity and desire is
phenomenal," said Col. Kevin A. Shwedo, director of operations, plans
and training for the Army Accessions Command. "Virtually every one of
them is called Mom, Dad, Grandma, Grandpa, but they bring a special
flair to every soldier in that group."

"I was comfortable in civilian life and did that 9-to-5 thing all the
time for a long time. I was just in a rut," said 39-year-old Pfc.
Randy Covington. "When they changed the age, it seemed like the
opportunity came back for me."

THE KIDS

At the other end of the spectrum, the American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU) released a 46-page report entitled "Soldiers of Misfortune",
which was for submission to the U.N. Committee on the Rights of the
Child. It accused the US of violating international protocol that
makes it illegal for children under the age of 18 to do military
service. It charged that the US military targets kids as young as
11-years-old. And focuses its effort disproportionately on poor and
minority public school students.
Military recruiters us "exaggerated promises of financial rewards for
enlistment, which undermines the voluntariness of their enlistment,"
it said. It even details the use of coercion, deception and even
sexual abuse by recruiters. Punishment for such transgressions was
rare, it reported.

"The United States military's procedures for recruiting students
plainly violate internationally standards and fail to protect youth
from abusive and aggressive recruitment tactics," said Jennifer
Turner of the ACLU Human Rights Project.

Stunningly, the US is only of two countries (the other is Somalia) to
have never ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The
Senate puts the age minimum for recruitment at 17. The report states
that the US armed services "regularly target children under 17 for
military recruitment, heavily recruiting on high school campuses, in
school lunchrooms, and in classes."

The ACLU surveyed 1,000 children aged from 14 to 17 who were enrolled
in New York City high schools as part of the report. One in five of
the respondents said that class time had been given over to military
recruiters, and 35% said that military recruiters had access to
multiple locations in the schools where they could meet students.

The ACLU contend that in their desperation the Pentagon's Reserve
Officer Training Corps (JROTC), which have access to over 3,000
junior high schools, middle schools and high school across the
country, have been targeting children as young as 14.

.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

I Was Just Following Orders

I Was Just Following Orders

http://lewrockwell.com/vance/vance176.html

by Laurence M. Vance
July 13, 2009

George Bush is an arrogant, egotistical, hypocrite. But he is not
alone. Every U.S. president, secretary of state, diplomat,
congressman, military commander, and other advocate of the highly
interventionist American foreign policy of the last fifty years is
just as arrogant, just as egotistical, and just as hypocritical.

A few days before he ordered U.S. dupes to invade Iraq back in 2003,
Bush the decider delivered an address to the nation from the White
House. As usual, the speech was full of lies:

--The United States and other nations did nothing to deserve or
invite this threat.

--In a free Iraq, there will be no more wars of aggression against
your neighbors, no more poison factories, no more executions of
dissidents, no more torture chambers and rape rooms.

--Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt
that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the
most lethal weapons ever devised.

Some observations. First, if it means anything, fifty years of U.S.
intervention in the Middle East means that the United States invited
any "threat" that we faced from that region of the world. Second, if
in a free Iraq there will be no more aggression and torture, then,
since the United States has an aggressive foreign policy and is
guilty of torture, can we call America a free country? And third,
speaking of the most lethal weapons ever devised (which, of course,
we know that Iraq never had), the United States not only has more of
these weapons than any other country, we are the only country to have
used them.

But it gets worse. In this same speech Bush instructed foreign
soldiers to do something that he would never want American soldiers to do:

And all Iraqi military and civilian personnel should listen
carefully to this warning. In any conflict, your fate will depend on
your action. Do not destroy oil wells, a source of wealth that
belongs to the Iraqi people. Do not obey any command to use weapons
of mass destruction against anyone, including the Iraqi people. War
crimes will be prosecuted. War criminals will be punished. And it
will be no defense to say, "I was just following orders."

So, the former commander in chief believes that soldiers should
sometimes disobey orders from their commanding officers. I have no
doubt that the current commander in chief believes likewise. But what
about American soldiers? Can they ever disobey orders? What would
happen if they refused to obey an order? What if they refused an
order to deploy to Iraq or Afghanistan? What if they refused an order
to launch a cruise missile, drop a bomb, throw a grenade, or pull a
trigger? What if they refused an order to harshly interrogate a
prisoner? We know what would happen: A U.S. soldier would be called a
traitor and a coward; he would be ridiculed and ostracized; he would
face court-martial or time in the brig; he would be called
un-American and un-patriotic.

But what if an American soldier thought an order was unjust? Wouldn't
he be excused?

First Lt. Ehren Watada wasn't. In fact, when he publicly refused to
fight in Iraq, the Army tried to court-martial him, but it ended in a
mistrial. Although a new court-martial date was later set,
rescheduled, and postponed, a federal judge ruled that the Army could
not prosecute Watada a second time because that would be double
jeopardy. A federal appeals court judge recently allowed the Army to
drop its appeal. Watada could still face charges of "conduct
unbecoming an officer" for public statements he made against Bush and the war.

But if soldiers should always obey orders then why aren't Iraqi
soldiers defending their homeland lauded as heroes? Aren't U.S.
soldiers who obeyed orders to invade Iraq all said to be heroes? Why
the double standard?

And what a double standard it is. This is American exceptionalism at
its worse and most deadly.

No soldier in any of the world's other 193 countries is supposed to
follow an order to fire a weapon at an American soldier, sink an
American ship, shoot down an American plane, drop a bomb on American
territory, invade American soil, mine an American harbor, occupy an
American city, torture an American, or kill an American. Those that
do are considered terrorists, insurgents, and enemy combatants, all
worthy of torture.

But if an American solider is ordered to launch a preemptive strike
against Iraq, he should just follow orders. If an American soldier is
ordered to bomb Afghanistan, he should just follow orders. If an
American soldier is ordered to drop napalm in the jungles of Vietnam,
he should just follow orders. If an American soldier is ordered to
invade Korea, he should just follow orders. If an American solider is
ordered to put down an insurrection by Filipinos, he should just
follow orders. If an American soldier is ordered to firebomb a German
or Japanese city, he should just follow orders. If an American
soldier is ordered to help the CIA remove a foreign leader, he should
just follow orders. If an American solider is ordered to intervene in
some country's civil war, he should just follow orders. If an
American soldier is ordered to destroy a city and kill its
inhabitants in a country that he cannot locate on a map, he should
just follow orders.

Just think what it would mean to the peace of the world, not to
mention the U.S. defense budget, if American soldiers limited their
activities to actually defending the United States – guarding
American borders, patrolling American coasts, protecting American
citizens, enforcing no-fly zones in American skies – and refusing to
follow orders to do otherwise.

That would truly be an America First foreign policy, a constitutional
foreign policy, a Jeffersonian foreign policy, a Ron Paul foreign policy.

Since it is soldiers the world over who do the actual fighting, we
would all be better off if none of them followed orders, including Americans.
--

Laurence M. Vance writes from Pensacola, FL. He is the author of
Christianity and War and Other Essays Against the Warfare State. His
newest book is The Revolution that Wasn't.

.

Is Military Service Honorable?

Is Military Service Honorable?

http://www.lewrockwell.com/reed/reed162.html

by Fred Reed
July 13, 2009

Last night Vi and I watched for the first time a documentary, shot by
my friend Jim Coyne, on Joan Baez and the movement against a war no
one any longer remembers, far away, on another planet. It was lovely
filmwork. Jim is a genius. I may have to stop having friends. I feel
inferior to all of them. It gets depressing.

Of no interest to anyone but me, perhaps, it completely changed my
understanding of Baez, whom I had regarded for forty years as just
another pretty voice. No. Smart, tough, principled in a world that
isn't. I hereby apologize.

In that war­I forget what planet it was on­the freaks and professors
and mothers and the simply decent finally managed stop the carnage,
though only after the Pentagon had killed 60,000 American kids and a
million or so Vietnamese, not to mention devastating Laos and
bringing Pol Pot to power. God I'm proud. We're such a force for democracy.

When the GIs left Asia in '73, the commie peaceniks thought they had
won. And they had, for ten minutes. The grip of the military on the
country loosened briefly.

Unfortunately the soldiers learned. Not how to win wars, which they
do poorly if at all, but how to keep a war going. Winning a war isn't
all it's cracked up to be. The promotions and contracts stop. When
you are paid to do something, it is in your interest not to finish doing it.

The Pentagon's first lesson learned was to avoid conscription, as the
conscripted and their families will take to the streets. By using an
army of volunteer suckers about whom nobody of importance cares, the
military severs its wars from most of the country, which loses
interest. The brass are then free to do as they choose.

The second lesson learned was that while defeating the enemy is not
necessary, and perhaps not desirable, controlling the press is
everything. And they did it.

So forty or so years after all the love-ins, the marches, the
righteous dope (all of which may seem silly, but in my view
preferable to watching a Cambodian mother screaming over the opened
bleeding guts of her child) the Pentagon is at it again. Once more
the jets howl over remote primitive countries, countries that did
nothing to the US and couldn't have, and promotions flow, and
contracts, and generals demand more troops and more money to stop
communism. Excuse me, terrorism. Soon, the Chinese, a better threat,
coming to a theater near you. With the passing of years, one demon
fades into another. Switching enemies is much easier now, what with
search-and-replace.

But it's all about democracy and freedom and patriotism and Saving
America from…from something. The hoopla changes little, and how well
it works. Patriotic friends sometimes say to me of the military
ardent things like, "When your country says go, you go!" I seldom
point out that no one in their families is in the slightest danger of
having to go, nor that "the country" is recruiting hard and they
aren't urging their children to enlist; nor do I ask, "What is your
attitude toward having your daughter drafted onto the streets of
Baghdad for five tours, perhaps coming back drooling and gurbling for
life after having her brains scrambled by a roadside bomb?"
Patriotism is important to patriots. They are full of it, and I'm
about a quart low. I shut up. I don't want to lose friends.

Yet…I think I must be a communist. It seems to me that when your
country says "go," you should ask, "Why?" Do you have a reason to
kill whoever you are being sent to kill? Then go. Otherwise, don't.
If I told you to go to Ottawa and kill Canadians, you would think me
mad, and think it correctly. Why then should you obediently kill them
because a politician in Washington tells you to do it? I do not understand.

And of course "your country" doesn't tell you anything at all.
Countries are abstractions. Men tell you to go, and for their own
purposes: Dick Cheney or George Bush, Nixon or Nitze, or the men who
run the petroleum industry, or people in the Israeli lobby, or men in
the military companies who want contracts, or officers who want to
give war a try.

Why are these people "my country"? And why isn't Joan Baez my country
instead of David Petraeus? I will choose who is my country, thank
you. Ledbelly, Benny Goodman, Carl Perkins and Miss Emily Anne will
come before Lemay, McNamara, Lyndon Johnson, and Obama. Long before.

Soldiers talk much of honor. I do not understand how military service
can possibly be thought honorable. If the Wehrmacht were landing in
North Carolina, yes, but I do not believe that it is. Where is the
honor in bombing from the air lightly armed peasants who can't fight
back? It is cowardly, yes, and obscene, but do not talk of honor.
Murder for hire is murder for hire.

We now have men who sit at screens, drinking coffee and firing
missiles from remote robotic aircraft at people on the ground whom
they cannot identify. Brave men, they. I could burst into a
kindergarten and kill the children with a ball bat. The one is as
honorable as the other.

Recently I saw on television a black sergeant in Afghanistan,
probably chosen by his commander for photogenicity, standing in front
of a tank or mobile gun, I forget which. He said something scripted
like "This is a such-and-such unit, the most powerful fighting force
in the world." This sort of ritual cockiness is carefully ingrained.
Near my barracks in Parris Island was a sign, "The most dangerous
thing in the world is a Marine rifleman." If it had said "an
ambitious colonel" it would have come closer to truth.

But one may wonder (unless one already knows) how good the Pentagon's
military really is. A pissed-off peasant with an RPG would seem on
the evidence more effective than the pricey zoom-kapows arrayed against him.

I cannot endorse the politics of the Taliban. If one of them told me
that my daughter couldn't go to school, one of us would leave the
room on a stretcher. Yet as fighting men, are they not magnificent?
They have only rifles, explosives, RPGs, and balls. Their enemies
have unlimited air support, helicopters, armor, artillery,
sophisticated communications, night-vision gear, good food and
excellent medical care. The Taliban take heavy casualties, their
enemies almost none. The ragheads do not even have PX privileges. Yet
they have not been defeated. A fight on even terms would last perhaps
five minutes.

This, for a trillion dollars.

What the hell. Plus ca change, plus ca doesn't. Next year in Beijing.
Tell you what, though. I never liked Kum Ba Yah, and "We Shall
Overcome" is probably the sappiest song ever written. But those
people had nothing to be ashamed of.
--

Fred Reed is author of Nekkid in Austin: Drop Your Inner Child Down a
Well and the just-published A Brass Pole in Bangkok: A Thing I Aspire
to Be. His latest book is Curmudgeing Through Paradise: Reports from
a Fractal Dung Beetle.

.

Sunday, July 12, 2009

The Military Invades U.S. Schools

The Military Invades U.S. Schools:
How Military Academies Are Being Used to Destroy Public Education

http://www.alternet.org/story/141034/

By Brian Roa
July 1, 2009.

In Chicago, there's a push to replace public schools with military
academies. This model may soon spread to the rest of the country.
--

For the past four years, I have observed the military occupation of
the high school where I teach science. Currently, Chicago's Senn High
School houses Rickover Naval Academy (RNA). I use the term
"occupation" because part of our building was taken away despite
student, parent, teacher and community opposition to RNA's opening.

Senn students are made to feel like second-class citizens inside
their own school, due to inequalities. The facilities and resources
are better on the RNA side. RNA students are allowed to walk on the
Senn side, while Senn students cannot walk on the RNA side. RNA
"disenrolls" students and we accept those students who get kicked out
if they live within our attendance boundaries. This practice is
against Chicago policy, but goes unchecked. All of these things
maintain a two-tiered system within the same school building.

This phenomenon is not restricted to Senn. Chicago has more military
academies and more students in JROTC than any other city in the US.
As the tentacles of school militarization reach beyond Chicago, the
process used in this city seems to serve as a model of expansion.
There was a Marine Academy planned for Georgia's Dekalb County, which
includes 10 percent of Atlanta. Fortunately, due to protest, the
school has been postponed until 2010. Despite it being postponed, it
is still useful to analyze the rhetoric used to rationalize the
Marine Academy. Many of the lies and excuses used to justify school
militarization in Chicago and Georgia may well be used in other
cities as militarism grows.

Not for Recruiting?

A favorite lie used to defend the expansion of military academies is
that they are not used to recruit for the military.

"This is not a training ground to send kids into the military,"
Dekalb Schools' Superintendent Crawford Lewis told the Atlanta
Journal-Constitution in March. Those same words could have come
straight from Col. Rick Mills, director of military academies and
JROTC in Chicago, who explained away recruitment in a similar fashion.

"This is not a recruiting tool, but a way to help students succeed at
whatever career they might choose," Mills told the Chicago Tribune.

Yet military academies receive money from the Department of Defense
(DoD). The DoD would be derelict in its responsibilities were that
money not spent as an investment in future soldiers. Accepting the
claim that there is no recruiting in military academies makes about
as much sense as allowing gangs to fund and operate within schools,
on the assumption that they won't recruit on school grounds.

Moreover, since military academies are staffed with ex-service
members (many don't even require valid teaching certificates),
students are likely to receive career advice that favors a military path.

There are more blatant examples of recruiting at RNA. The cadets -
the label applied to students at military academies - have taken a
school-sponsored field trip to the Naval Academy in Annapolis,
Maryland. Furthermore, last year the school hosted Adm. Michael
Mullen, the current chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Mullen
told the cadets that the Navy was a "great career choice." RNA has
hosted ten admirals in their short four-year history.

In addition to these direct tactics, the academies use more insidious
approaches. A military culture permeates these schools. Students
dress in uniform, receive demerits, and are introduced to the
military hierarchy and way of life. For example, I have witnessed
students marching with fake rifles. This cultivation of a militarized
mind is the best explanation for why 40 percent of all Naval Junior
Reserve Officer Training Corps program graduates wind up entering
military service. This statistic is especially telling, considering
that less than one percent of the population has served in the
military at any given moment since 1975.

The Choice Argument

Military academies are promoted as an option within the public school
system for parents. We heard it from Arne Duncan (ex-CEO of CPS and
current secretary of education) and we hear it from Dale Davis,
public information officer for the Dekalb County School System, who
calls the military school "an addition" for parents to consider.
Compare that with what Colonel Mills said in December 2007 in the
Online News Hour: "The purpose of the military academy programs is to
offer our cadets and parents an educational choice among many choices
in Chicago Public Schools and to provide an educational experience
that has a college prep curriculum, combined with a military curriculum."

We must dissect what kind of "choice" parents are given. If one's
only choices are a school in desperate need of repair or a shiny new
military academy, parents will often "choose" the "better" school.

The unbalanced funding presents an incredibly difficult decision for
many parents, as Marivel Igartua, mother of a cadet inside the Naval
Academy, told me. She didn't want to have to send her daughter to
RNA, but she felt squeezed into the choice because her area school
was in such bad shape. The unequal allocation of resources, which
favors military academies, can serve as a form of economic coercion
upon parents.

If public schools were given the resources they need to improve, then
we could offer parents a more real choice.

Military pushers also argue that the academies are a popular option
among parents. According to Mills, quoted in In These Times in 2005,
"These kinds of programs would not be in schools if there weren't
kids who wanted it, parents who supported it and administrators who
facilitated it."

Arne Duncan claimed there were waiting lists filled with children
hoping to attend a military academy. However, CPS has never released
the so-called waiting lists, and concrete numbers tell a different
story. RNA's goal for student enrollment for this year was 500-600
students. RNA finished the year with 376 students. Where's the demand?

Military Academies in the Context of Dismantling Public Education

Viewing militarization in the broader scope of "school improvement"
can provide a helpful lens. In Chicago, military academies often
represented one offshoot of a general plan to break down public
education and replace it with charter schools and contract schools,
siphoning public money to business people and "nonprofits." However,
these "chosen" schools don't perform any better than public schools.
A recent Chicago study compared ACT scores between charter schools
and neighborhood schools, and no statistically significant difference
was found. There was a difference in the number of English language
learners and special-needs students accepted. Charters received fewer
of both students. We see the same dichotomy with Senn and RNA.

What may be more problematic is that sometimes the charterization
movement masks hidden agendas Sometimes the hidden agenda is union
busting. Sometimes it's gentrification. Sometimes it is
militarization. We have seen all of these hidden agendas in Chicago.
We all agree that public schools are in desperate need of renovation
and repair. But simply demonizing public schools as failing without
giving them the resources to succeed - and replacing them with
experimental schools - is unjust.

The push to destroy public schools and replace them with military
academies and charter schools was further facilitated under the
mayoral control of schools in Chicago. Mayoral control means that a
city's once publicly elected school board is replaced by mayoral
appointees partial to the agenda set forth by the mayor. In Chicago,
it also meant replacing the school superintendent, who was legally
mandated to have public education experience, with a CEO, who is only
mandated by his scruples. Duncan served as the CEO for several years.
He helped administer and finish off the largest militarization of a
school system in the US, under the banner of "school improvement."

If we look at the history of Chicago's "school improvement" plan, we
can see the hidden agenda pushed by the charter movement. According
to Pauline Lipman, writing in Substance News in 2005, it is a plan
whose blueprint was ripped from the Commercial Club of Chicago, a
conglomerate of Fortune 500 companies in Chicago. Schools are closed
and reopened while students are shuffled around to other schools,
which are often performing worse than their original school. Little
regard is paid to the education of the majority of students, almost
all of them poor, black and Latino/a. Simply put, Chicago's plan is
not a school improvement plan. It is the dismantling of a public good
for the benefit of a chosen few. School militarization was
accelerated as this plan was being implemented in Chicago.

The pushing of similar plans can be expected throughout the US now
that Duncan is secretary of education. With the stimulus bill's $100
billion in emergency aid for public schools and colleges, Duncan is
in an incredible position of power. He could use it to promote
renovation and increase resources to existing public schools. Or he
could spend it on costly privatization and militarization,
squandering our tax money and endangering our children's futures.

.

Army Suicides Trending Upward for 2009

Army Suicides Trending Upward for 2009

http://www.military.com/news/article/army-suicides-trending-upward-for-2009.html

July 10, 2009

The Army yesterday released its monthly report on suicides, reporting
that while there were no confirmed suicides among active-duty troops
for June there are nine deaths still under investigation.

So far this year there have been 88 reported suicides in among
active-duty troops, officials said, of which 54 have been confirmed.
The Army is still looking into the other 34.

Should that number bear out the Army will have surpassed the total
number of active-duty suicides for the same period last year by more
than 20. For the first six months of 2008, officials said in the
report, there were 67 confirmed suicides in the active-duty Army.

Among Reserve troops the trend also may be upwards, based on the
Army's latest figures.

So far this year there have been 16 confirmed suicides in that
component, and 23 other deaths remain under investigation as possible
suicides. Between January and June 2008 there were 29 confirmed
suicides among Reserve troops not on active duty, the Army said.

Testifying in March before the Senate Armed Services Military
Personnel Subcommittee, Army Gen. Peter W. Chiarelli attributed the
spiking suicide rate to continued long deployments.

"We must find ways to relieve some of this stress," Chiarelli, vice
chief of staff of the Army, said in testimony reported by CNN. "I
think it is the cumulative effect of deployments from 12 to 15 months."

Brig. Gen. Colleen McGuire, director of Army Suicide Prevention Task
Force, said in a press release issued yesterday that every Soldier
suicide i"s different and tragic in its own way.

"Our current research and prevention efforts are identifying common
denominators that lead Soldiers to take their own life. It's often a
combination of many factors that overwhelm an individual."

What the Army does know right now is that Soldiers most at risk of
suicide are men in combat-arms specialties between the ages of 18 and
27, according to McGuire. The Army is looking at existing suicide
prevention programs and other "institutional safety nets" to see what
works and what needs to be changed to make them more effective, she said.

The Army is currently wrapping up the second phase of a three-phase
service-wide program intended to reduce suicides. The first and
second phases included interactive training programs and small-unit
leader training. The final part of the program will include sustained
annual suicide prevention training for all troops. The training will
emphasize common causes of suicidal behavior and the critical role
Army leaders, friends, co-workers and families play in maintaining
behavioral health, according to the Army press release.

The Army's most current suicide prevention information may be found
at: http://www.armyg1.army.mil/hr/suicide/.

.

Saturday, July 11, 2009

All Active-Duty, Most Reserve Components Meet Recruiting Goals

All Active-Duty, Most Reserve Components Meet Recruiting Goals

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=55084

By John J. Kruzel
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, July 10, 2009 – All active-duty military components met
or exceeded their recruiting goals in June, with the Marine Corps
adding the highest percentage of its target to its ranks, Defense
Department officials announced today.

Military reserve components, with the exception of the Army National
Guard, also met or exceeded their goals.

Data published on the Defense Department Web site shows that the
Marine Corps goal was to add 3,655 new Marines, which it exceeded by
14 percent, recruiting a total of 4,155. The Marine Corps Reserve
more than doubled its goal of 565, adding more than 1,200 Marines.

The Army National Guard fell short of its mark, recruiting 84 percent
of its goal to add 3,209 soldiers.

The Army National Guard has reduced its accession mission as part of
its end-strength management program, officials said, and is on track
to achieve its year-end goal.

Here is the breakdown of the other components:

-- Active-duty Army: 6,207 accessions with a goal of 6,025, for 103 percent;

-- Active-duty Navy: 3,428 accessions with a goal of 3,428, for 100 percent;

-- Active-duty Air Force: 2,846 accessions with a goal of 2,835, for
100 percent;

-- Army Reserve: 4,091 accessions with a goal of 3,488, for 117 percent;

-- Navy Reserve: 726 accessions with a goal of 726, for 100 percent;

-- Air National Guard: 867 accessions with a goal of 810, for 107 percent; and

-- Air Force Reserve: 836 accessions with a goal of 836 for 100 percent.

.

Friday, July 10, 2009

Army Leaders Struggle to Understand Record Suicides

Army Leaders Struggle to Understand Record Suicides

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=54895

By Fred W. Baker III
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, June 24, 2009 – Each case is as unique as the name
inscribed on the dog tags. Soldiers are taking their own lives in
record numbers, and Army senior leaders are struggling to understand why.

"It rips your heart out," the Army's vice chief of staff, Gen. Peter
W. Chiarelli, told a group of soldiers last month while on a
week-long tour of Army installations to look for clues.

Last year, 143 soldiers killed themselves -- a record in the past
three decades since the Army has been tallying the numbers. For 2009,
the service again is headed toward a record year.

January's spike of nearly two dozen confirmed or suspected suicides
prompted leaders to form a senior-level task force to try to uncover
the causes and reform the systems to help suffering soldiers.

"It really drove home that the Army needed to do something now," Army
Brig. Gen. Colleen L. McGuire, director of the suicide prevention
task force, said in an interview here yesterday.

It's easy to point a finger at soldiers' multiple deployments, little
time at home and the stress of serving in two wars as the causes. But
hundreds of thousands of soldiers have deployed, and only a fraction
have chosen to end their lives.

McGuire and other members of the task force accompanied Chiarelli as
he visited several major Army installations to talk with leaders and
troops hoping to find a common thread.

Their finding: it's complicated.

McGuire said that during the trip it became apparent that the problem
is not simply suicide-related, but that many soldiers are engaging in
unhealthy and risky behavior, such as binging on alcohol and mixing
it with readily available prescription drugs.

In combat, soldiers are encouraged to take risks, and are rewarded
for it. But at home, they are taking the wrong kinds of risks, she said.

"What we're finding … is that there is a great deal of alcohol and
[prescription] drugs available to soldiers," she said. The drugs are
prescribed for their combat-related injuries. But many are using them
to kill the pain of returning from war to face the realities of the
home front.

Failed marriages, financial problems, military disciplinary actions
and upcoming deployments all add to the stress. Any of these can
serve as a trigger for someone considering suicide, McGuire said.

In combat -- a disciplined environment -- soldiers know their limits
and leaders know their soldiers. But for many in today's military,
the less-restricted garrison life is a foreign environment, McGuire said.

"How do we address the needs of today's soldier? It's not the same
soldier from the '90s," she said.

And it's not the same leader, either.

Many of today's young leaders were brought up in the heavy deployment
cycle of two wars. They have spent most of their time either in the
field training for deployment, deployed, or at home on leave
following a deployment.

They no longer are accustomed to the processes, paperwork and
inspections that made up the preceding two decades of
garrison-oriented leadership and soldiering. McGuire said she thinks
some may have lost those garrison leadership skills, such as health
and welfare inspections, that took care of troops in that environment.

During their installation visits, McGuire said, the task force found
that many of the administrative and discipline processes in place in
garrison are not being used, due either to ignorance or choice.

For example, if a unit is readying for deployment, some commanders
are not sending their soldiers through military drug programs after
testing positive for illegal drug use to maintain troop-strength
levels. Leaders are required to refer every soldier who has tested
positive for illegal drugs, or who has had an alcohol-related
incident, to the Army substance abuse program. That's not happening
every time, McGuire said.

"Soldiers who either have a [driving under the influence charge],
engaged in domestic violence where alcohol was involved, or they
tested positive in a [urinalysis] are not being referred," she said.

And disciplinary forms that are supposed to make their way to the
senior installation commanders reporting soldiers' infractions are
being turned in less than a third of the time on some installations.

McGuire said the problem is partly administrative and partly that
many commanders are overwhelmed.

"It's just another paperwork drill. It's just more that we're putting
on commanders," the general said. But also, she said, some leaders
are cutting soldiers breaks, thinking they are doing them a favor,
but hurting them in the end.

The task force also is honing in on how isolation factors into its suicides.

The past 30 years have seen a shift away from communal barracks,
where as many as 30 single soldiers shared an open bay. Typically,
the leader lived in a room at the end of the bay. Married soldiers
lived on post in Army-provided housing.

Now, many single soldiers are in single or double dormitory-style
rooms. Most married soldiers live off post. Some are isolated by duty
assignment, such as recruiters stationed far from military
installations. Other soldiers are assigned solitary late-night
shifts. And some in unique job specialties may feel isolated even
within a unit.

This is compounded by the fact that within a few months of returning
home, most leaders and soldiers are transferred to other units.
Soldiers who have problems often find themselves without their battle
buddies and the leaders who watched over them in combat. Their new
leaders, who don't know them as well, are pushing to prepare for the
next deployment.

Many of the diagnostic programs in place now are seen simply as a
block that must be checked in the pre-deployment process, precious
time to be carved out of a hectic deployment schedule, McGuire said.

And then there's the institutional stigma of seeking mental health
care. Soldiers think they should deal with their problems. Leaders
should be strong, and they feel asking for help is a sign of
weakness, McGuire said. And there still is the fear that security
clearances can be revoked.

McGuire stopped short of saying the task force was looking to
overhaul the system. And its members really do not want to simply
create another program, she said. In fact, commanders often are
overwhelmed by the number of programs the Army already has.

"We have existing programs that are designed to ensure the good order
and discipline of the organization," McGuire said. "Let's just
enforce what we currently have before we create more and new."

Another possible soldier suicide, this time in Iraq, was added to the
numbers last week. It too, is under investigation.

Chiarelli now is immediately briefed on any suspected suicides. He
committed to personally reviewing each suicide case this year. In
March, he received his first briefing.

"It was the most intense two and a half hours I have ever spent, even
from being in a combat zone," Chiarelli told a group of soldiers
during a stop at Fort Bragg, N.C. "It was an experience I will never forget."

The task force is temporary, and will spend less than a year looking
for gaps in the system. No quick fixes are expected. While senior
leadership hopes to better put its finger on the pulse of the force,
the sad fact is that those serving in the Pentagon are not on the
front lines of stopping soldiers from taking their own lives.

That falls to the soldiers' families and friends, McGuire said.

"If we see a friend, a family member or a buddy that seems to be
hurting -- needs some help -- we need to take action," she said.

And it's their leaders.

"It takes getting to know your soldiers. It takes getting to know how
they live, understand their stressors, who their friends are. It's
basic leadership," McGuire said.

.

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

NASCAR drums up Guard support

NASCAR drums up Guard support

http://www.news-journalonline.com/NewsJournalOnline/News/Headlines/frtHEAD01070209.htm

July 02, 2009
By KELLY CUCULIANSKY
Staff Writer

DAYTONA BEACH -- Mix a Dale Earnhardt Jr. appearance with free
T-shirts shooting out of cannons and some live rock 'n roll, and the
National Guard is going to get a decent-sized crowd for recruiting.

Hundreds showed up for the National Guard's Battle of the Bands,
where local band Evil Pretty was chosen as the winner Wednesday
night. Billed as free entertainment, the Daytona Beach Bandshell
event was also a tool for recruiters to meet folks and spread the
word about military service opportunities.

Earnhardt was on hand to answer questions from fans and unveil the
new, patriotic design of his No. 88 Chevrolet in time for Saturday's
Coke Zero 400 race July 4 at the Daytona International Speedway. The
car features an Army combat uniform design and represents the Guard's
sponsorship.

The Guard has sponsored Earnhardt's car for two years; however, the
actual hand-painted race car was at the track and took two days to paint.

It's also not the first time a branch of the military has worked with
Earnhardt. The U.S. Navy was the primary sponsor for the No. 88
Chevrolet owned by JR Motorsports for about two years for the NASCAR
Nationwide Series.

Earnhardt said there's a huge sense of responsibility working with a
military sponsor. He does meet-and-greets with guardsmen and women
and talks to young adults who are considering enlisting.

"They put me in front of a lot of different groups," he said. "I
think the most interesting group is probably the kids who are
considering enlisting or are just about to enlist or they're a week
away from going to Chicago to go through (boot) camp.

"It's an interesting lifestyle, and it's weird to be 34 years old and
look at an 18-year-old kid who's just graduated high school and has
decided to go to the Guard," Earnhardt said, adding that he didn't
have such a defined life path at that age.

Amid the crowd of spectators, about 15 recruiters were on hand to
talk to people about the Guard, which is about 363,000 soldiers
strong and the oldest component of the country's armed forces.

Lt. Col. David Peek said the Florida Guard had about 1,600 new
recruits last year and came to talk to potential new ones.

"All through the day, people are drawn to the uniform. People just
come up and want to talk to us, and the conversations lead to the
benefits of joining the Guard," said Peek, a recruiting and retention
commander with the Florida Army National Guard. "We'll probably get
some good leads out of this event just looking at the crowd and the
demographic here."

It's too early to tell the success of the event, but even getting
just 10 enlistments out of 100 raw leads would be considered good, he
said. "We've probably planted seeds here."

The Guard's target age group for new recruits is people ages 17 to
35, Peek said. Being one of the primary sponsors for Earnhardt gives
the Guard the opportunity to use his celebrity for recruiting that group.

"We went straight to the top, and we got the No. 1 guy," Peek said.

And if it wasn't for the free music, many like Chris Owens, 18, were
drawn by the chance of seeing the racing star. Owens, who just
graduated from high school, said he attended the event because he's a
huge Earnhardt fan.

The Daytona Beach teen, who had already been approached by the Guard
at a mall, was one of dozens who caught a free Earnhardt/National
Guard T-shirt that was shot into the crowd.

Already sporting the new shirt while a band played, Owens said the
Guard obviously has a "good strategy" for recruiting, because they're
showing up where the young people are.

"Quite frankly, no teenager is going to miss this," he said. "When I
heard Dale Jr. was going to be here, I just had to get here."

And even though he came to see Earnhardt, Owens said he's thinking
about a major life change with the Guard.

"I've really been considering taking them up on the offer," he said.
--

kelly.cuculiansky@news-jrnl.com

.

Army No Longer Needs Signing Bonuses to Recruit

Army No Longer Needs Signing Bonuses to Recruit

http://www.wltx.com/news/story.aspx?storyid=75623&catid=299

Posted By: Michael Benning
7/2/2009

As unemployment numbers climb people are signing up for the Army in
abnormally high numbers in the midlands. But even the military is
starting to have fewer positions available.

Right now the incentive of a guaranteed paycheck, benefits, and job
training is awfully enticing to many like Chante Burnell. The 23 year
old graduated from USC last December to a very poor job climate.

"I was looking for jobs, and I was having a hard time finding a job,
and my ultimate goal was to go to law school," said Burnell.

So in April she did what many are doing by enlisting in the Army. "It
seems for many people, the best option for right now is to join the
Army to have some kind of income, some kind of salary."

It's that attitude which is changing the way recruiters like Myron
Adams do their job.

"We either make phone calls or go out and about, and now we have
people walking in. We can see 7-10 people and that's odd," said Adams.

It's even more odd considering the country is involved in war.

"You have people saying I'll take that chance. I need to survive, I
need to take care of my family, so that's a risk I'm willing to
take," said Adams.

Many people are taking that risk now more than any other time this
decade. Through May, 256 people signed up for active duty throughout
Columbia. That's 44% more than just four years ago.

"Bottom line is, it's the economy," said Adams.

There's so many people coming in that the Army has taken away the
$20,000 dollar signing bonus for most jobs. Also, the more high
desired positions are now all taken.

"We may not have what they want to do, but we'll sit down with them
and figure something out," said Adams.

The South Carolina Army National Guard is in a similar situation. In
response to the high interest, they've eliminated most signing
bonuses, and altered their recruiting standards by changing the age
limit and raising minimum test scores allowed.

.