Tuesday, June 30, 2009

The Chicago Model of Militarizing Schools

The Chicago Model of Militarizing Schools

http://www.truthout.org/062909T?n

Monday 29 June 2009
by: Brian Roa

For the past four years, I have observed the military occupation
of the high school where I teach science. Currently, Chicago's Senn
High School houses Rickover Naval Academy (RNA). I use the term
"occupation" because part of our building was taken away despite
student, parent, teacher and community opposition to RNA's opening.

Senn students are made to feel like second-class citizens inside
their own school, due to inequalities. The facilities and resources
are better on the RNA side. RNA students are allowed to walk on the
Senn side, while Senn students cannot walk on the RNA side. RNA
"disenrolls" students and we accept those students who get kicked out
if they live within our attendance boundaries. This practice is
against Chicago policy, but goes unchecked. All of these things
maintain a two-tiered system within the same school building.

This phenomenon is not restricted to Senn. Chicago has more
military academies and more students in JROTC than any other city in
the US. As the tentacles of school militarization reach beyond
Chicago, the process used in this city seems to serve as a model of
expansion. There was a Marine Academy planned for Georgia's Dekalb
County, which includes 10 percent of Atlanta. Fortunately, due to
protest, the school has been postponed until 2010. Despite it being
postponed, it is still useful to analyze the rhetoric used to
rationalize the Marine Academy. Many of the lies and excuses used to
justify school militarization in Chicago and Georgia may well be used
in other cities as militarism grows.

Not for Recruiting?

A favorite lie used to defend the expansion of military
academies is that they are not used to recruit for the military.

"This is not a training ground to send kids into the military,"
Dekalb Schools' Superintendent Crawford Lewis told the Atlanta
Journal-Constitution in March. Those same words could have come
straight from Col. Rick Mills, director of military academies and
JROTC in Chicago, who explained away recruitment in a similar fashion.

"This is not a recruiting tool, but a way to help students
succeed at whatever career they might choose," Mills told the Chicago Tribune.

Yet military academies receive money from the Department of
Defense (DoD). The DoD would be derelict in its responsibilities were
that money not spent as an investment in future soldiers. Accepting
the claim that there is no recruiting in military academies makes
about as much sense as allowing gangs to fund and operate within
schools, on the assumption that they won't recruit on school grounds.

Moreover, since military academies are staffed with ex-service
members (many don't even require valid teaching certificates),
students are likely to receive career advice that favors a military path.

There are more blatant examples of recruiting at RNA. The cadets
- the label applied to students at military academies - have taken a
school-sponsored field trip to the Naval Academy in Annapolis,
Maryland. Furthermore, last year the school hosted Adm. Michael
Mullen, the current chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Mullen
told the cadets that the Navy was a "great career choice." RNA has
hosted ten admirals in their short four-year history.

In addition to these direct tactics, the academies use more
insidious approaches. A military culture permeates these schools.
Students dress in uniform, receive demerits, and are introduced to
the military hierarchy and way of life. For example, I have witnessed
students marching with fake rifles. This cultivation of a militarized
mind is the best explanation for why 40 percent of all Naval Junior
Reserve Officer Training Corps program graduates wind up entering
military service. This statistic is especially telling, considering
that less than one percent of the population has served in the
military at any given moment since 1975.

The Choice Argument

Military academies are promoted as an option within the public
school system for parents. We heard it from Arne Duncan (ex-CEO of
CPS and current secretary of education) and we hear it from Dale
Davis, public information officer for the Dekalb County School
System, who calls the military school "an addition" for parents to
consider. Compare that with what Colonel Mills said in December 2007
in the Online News Hour: "The purpose of the military academy
programs is to offer our cadets and parents an educational choice
among many choices in Chicago Public Schools and to provide an
educational experience that has a college prep curriculum, combined
with a military curriculum."

We must dissect what kind of "choice" parents are given. If
one's only choices are a school in desperate need of repair or a
shiny new military academy, parents will often "choose" the "better" school.

The unbalanced funding presents an incredibly difficult decision
for many parents, as Marivel Igartua, mother of a cadet inside the
Naval Academy, told me. She didn't want to have to send her daughter
to RNA, but she felt squeezed into the choice because her area school
was in such bad shape. The unequal allocation of resources, which
favors military academies, can serve as a form of economic coercion
upon parents.

If public schools were given the resources they need to improve,
then we could offer parents a more real choice.

Military pushers also argue that the academies are a popular
option among parents. According to Mills, quoted in In These Times in
2005, "These kinds of programs would not be in schools if there
weren't kids who wanted it, parents who supported it and
administrators who facilitated it."

Arne Duncan claimed there were waiting lists filled with
children hoping to attend a military academy. However, CPS has never
released the so-called waiting lists, and concrete numbers tell a
different story. RNA's goal for student enrollment for this year was
500-600 students. RNA finished the year with 376 students. Where's the demand?

Military Academies in the Context of Dismantling Public Education

Viewing militarization in the broader scope of "school
improvement" can provide a helpful lens. In Chicago, military
academies often represented one offshoot of a general plan to break
down public education and replace it with charter schools and
contract schools, siphoning public money to business people and
"nonprofits." However, these "chosen" schools don't perform any
better than public schools. A recent Chicago study compared ACT
scores between charter schools and neighborhood schools, and no
statistically significant difference was found. There was a
difference in the number of English language learners and
special-needs students accepted. Charters received fewer of both
students. We see the same dichotomy with Senn and RNA.

What may be more problematic is that sometimes the
charterization movement masks hidden agendas Sometimes the hidden
agenda is union busting. Sometimes it's gentrification. Sometimes it
is militarization. We have seen all of these hidden agendas in
Chicago. We all agree that public schools are in desperate need of
renovation and repair. But simply demonizing public schools as
failing without giving them the resources to succeed - and replacing
them with experimental schools - is unjust.

The push to destroy public schools and replace them with
military academies and charter schools was further facilitated under
the mayoral control of schools in Chicago. Mayoral control means that
a city's once publicly elected school board is replaced by mayoral
appointees partial to the agenda set forth by the mayor. In Chicago,
it also meant replacing the school superintendent, who was legally
mandated to have public education experience, with a CEO, who is only
mandated by his scruples. Duncan served as the CEO for several years.
He helped administer and finish off the largest militarization of a
school system in the US, under the banner of "school improvement."

If we look at the history of Chicago's "school improvement"
plan, we can see the hidden agenda pushed by the charter movement.
According to Pauline Lipman, writing in Substance News in 2005, it is
a plan whose blueprint was ripped from the Commercial Club of
Chicago, a conglomerate of Fortune 500 companies in Chicago. Schools
are closed and reopened while students are shuffled around to other
schools, which are often performing worse than their original school.
Little regard is paid to the education of the majority of students,
almost all of them poor, black and Latino/a. Simply put, Chicago's
plan is not a school improvement plan. It is the dismantling of a
public good for the benefit of a chosen few. School militarization
was accelerated as this plan was being implemented in Chicago.

The pushing of similar plans can be expected throughout the US
now that Duncan is secretary of education. With the stimulus bill's
$100 billion in emergency aid for public schools and colleges, Duncan
is in an incredible position of power. He could use it to promote
renovation and increase resources to existing public schools. Or he
could spend it on costly privatization and militarization,
squandering our tax money and endangering our children's futures.
--

Brian Roa is a science teacher at Chicago's Senn High School and
a member of CORE (Caucus of Rank and File Educators), a caucus in the
CTU which works for equitable education for all students and against
the charterization schemes in Chicago.

.

US Military welcomes non-citizen soldiers

US Military welcomes non-citizen soldiers

http://www.examiner.com/x-8151-Charleston-Military-Community-Examiner~y2009m6d28-US-Military-welcomes-noncitizen-soldiers

June 28, 2009
by Susy Raybon

In Tegucigalpa, Honduras this month, America welcomed two
foreign-born soldiers as citizens.

On June 8, the US Embassy hosted the first ever US Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) naturalization ceremony ever held in
Latin America.

"I can think of no greater privilege than to be the first to welcome
as the newest citizens of the United States, two American soldiers,
who currently serve our nation in Honduras and who have each already
completed two tours in Iraq," said Michael Aytes, USCIS' Acting
Deputy Director.

Army Staff Sgt. Damien Milne, a native of the Marshall Islands,
submitted his application for U.S. citizenship less than a month ago.
He received a perfect score on the USCIS naturalization test. He now
calls Killeen, Texas (Ft. Hood) his home.

Army Sgt. Carmen Villa, born in Mexico, also had a perfect score on
her USCIS test. She resides in Columbia, SC, a member of a US Army
aviation regiment.

Honduras is one of 15 countries since 2004 where US Citizenship and
Immigration Services have conducted naturalization ceremonies outside
the United States. Before Oct. 1, 2004, military service members
could only naturalize in the United States.

One week after the soldiers in Honduras became US citizens the
American flag-draped casket of Sgt. Jasper Obakrairur arrived in his
hometown of Koror on the island of Palau, 4500 miles southwest of
Hawaii. Sgt. Obakrairur was killed by a roadside bomb in Afghanistan
before he was able to realize his dreams of becoming a US citizen.

Since September 2001, US Citizenship and Immigration Services
officials have naturalized more than 49,000 members of the U.S. armed
forces.

Only legal immigrants are accepted into the US Military.

For more information (and requirements) about USCIS' special services
for the military and their families, please visit
http://www.uscis.gov/military. USCIS has established a toll-free
military help line, 1-877-CIS-4MIL (1-877-247-4645)
--

Examiner's Note: As with their brothers and sisters in arms from
Latin America, many Pacific Islanders have joined the US armed forces
as a way to improve their education, lift themselves out of poverty
and have the potential of becoming American citizens. Guam, the
Northern Marianas, Micronesia and Palau have lost 32 men and women to
the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2003. Currently, the republic
of Palau alone has 200 fighting men and women in uniform.

.

Monday, June 29, 2009

From recruiting to rape?

From recruiting to rape?

http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/article_6111.shtml

Anti-war advocates aren't surprised by shocking abuse charges

By Charlene Muhammad
Western Region Correspondent
Updated Jun 25, 2009

LOS ANGELES (FinalCall.com) - Prosecutors have set a $1 million bail
for a U.S. Marine charged with pimping, kidnapping, and intending to
rape a 14-year-old girl.

Reports indicate that Staff Sgt. Bryan Damone Cunningham, of San
Pedro, California was previously honored three times for good conduct.

Military watch groups say the incident presents an opportunity to
shed light on illegal recruitment methods, primarily targeting minors.

According to reports, after arranging the plot online, the recruiter
drove 18-year-old Justin Willard and 19-year-old Homer Daskalakis to
Hemet, Calif., to have sex with the girl. Afterward, he attempted to
take her from the southeast location to Los Angeles.

Police discovered the plot when they stopped the car, which was being
driven erratically, reports said.

"Unfortunately it doesn't surprise me because we do hear of
incidences of when minor girls have been receiving a call from their
recruiter, being sexually assaulted, taken from their homes and all
kinds of situations. We're deeply concerned and there have been
numerous reports of underage assaults by military recruiters. This is
a serious problem and this needs to be addressed," said Arlene
Inouye, founder of the Coalition for Alternatives to Militarism in Our Schools.

She recalled a case in 2008 where a 17-year-old was taken from her
home by a recruiter. According to Ms. Inouye, the minor wanted to
enlist in the military, though her parents objected. The girl wrote a
runaway letter and told her parents she was going to boot camp the
next day. The recruiter picked her up and took her to his home, said
Ms. Inouye.

Her group was called for assistance and Ms. Inouye said she doesn't
know if the girl was raped, but she was given alcohol. Although the
minor willingly chose to leave home, Ms. Inouye said the larger issue
is the recruiter's movement of a person still under parental authority.

"The military should obey the optional protocol established by the UN
and agreed to by the U.S. that says young minors should not be
recruited into the military period. I think it's outrageous that
military recruiters are able to have contact with students, maybe
they make the first contact at school and then it continues off
campus. I know that they invite them to have lunch or go to a movie
... our minors are not in a position to make these kinds of life and
death decisions without having the facts. They should not be marketed
to and wined and dined, which is what these recruiters do ... that is
totally irresponsible for us as a nation and inhumane," she said.

Maricela Guzman, a Navy veteran and peace education coordinator for
the American Friends Service Committee, also worked to help the
17-year-old's family get her back. The parents, who were non-English
speaking, actually signed some documents, but the recruiters lied to
them about the paperwork and never gave them copies, she said.

When the mother began asking about the disappearance of her daughter,
the recruiters told her that if they did have her, they couldn't tell
her, Ms. Guzman continued.

After the family contacted a lawyer, who threatened to take further
action, the recruiter's office produced the girl, Ms. Guzman said.

"One of the things about recruiters is they have access to school,
the community, and people don't know who to go to for accountability
with recruiters. Even the school systems in L.A. ... There's no
policy set when it comes to these adults who are working with youth,
who are underage, without sometimes having permission with their
parents to have that discussion with them about the military," she said.

A lot of stories go untold because victims remain silent, said Ms.
Guzman. "We see gender as very skewed even when it comes to these
kinds of cases, because we do see that this is happening to young
women, but overall there's a policy set with recruiters who are
giving misinformation to youth, no matter what their sex, gender or age."

Ms. Guzman said nothing promised by recruiters is binding. "I was a
service member and my recruiters made all these promises to me. I
sent my military contract when I went to boot camp and everything my
recruiter said, they were supposed to help me get to the next rank,
was a lie," she said.

She and her family fought for a year-and-a-half and eventually the
military increased her rank and paid her retroactively.

Ms. Inouye said that more courting of minors happens inside the Omni
Experience Center in the Franklin Mills Malls in Philadelphia. The
center is the size of three football fields, filled with video games,
Hummer rides, simulated combat and virtual rifles, she said. The
center opened last August but plans are to expand across the nation
if it is successful in recruiting, Ms. Inouye said.

"It's going the other direction. Instead of protecting our youth ...
we're seducing them and going younger and younger. These are
12-13-year-olds so the direction is moving towards the younger ages," she said.

Ms. Guzman, who told The Final Call she was raped in boot camp,
argued that along with little accountability is a military culture
plagued by sexism and misogyny. The latest case is critical because
it opens a larger discussion of society's use of sex as a tool and
connections to the military, she said.

.

Persevere for youth protection acts

Persevere for youth protection acts

http://www.times-standard.com/othervoices/ci_12695080?nclick_check=1

Dave Meserve/For the Times-Standard
Posted: 06/26/2009

Last week, after having previously canceled the scheduled public
court hearing for oral arguments, Federal Judge Saundra Armstrong
issued her ruling on the federal challenge to the Arcata and Eureka
Youth Protection Acts.

Approved by large majorities in both cities last November, these are
the ballot initiative ordinances which prohibit military recruiters
from initiating contact with minors for the purpose of recruiting
them into the armed forces.

Judge Armstrong granted two U.S. Department of Justice motions.

The first invalidated the cities' ordinances, without any further
opportunity for the attorneys to present arguments in their support.

The second dismissed the cities' counter-claims that sought to allow
for immediate enforcement of the measures.

Her ruling is based on the Supremacy Clause of the United States
Constitution, which mandates that the Constitution, laws enacted by
Congress, and ratified treaties are the "Supreme Law of the Land" and
trump any state or local laws.

While the ruling itself was not unexpected, its content reads like a
word-for-word restatement of the government's motions, and it
includes no response whatsoever to any of the arguments in support of
the ordinance.

The attorneys for the city of Arcata believe that the judge, in
ruling without allowing oral arguments, also ruled without giving due
consideration to the legal filings of the cities. Therefore they are
recommending that the cities appeal the ruling, and they have
extended their offer of pro-bono legal representation through the
appeal process. It will now be up to the city councils in Arcata and
Eureka to approve the appeal.

The arguments that will be raised in appeal include the following:
The denial of a public hearing and the focus of the ruling suggest
that the judge did not give fair consideration to the case presented
in defense of the ordinances.

The cities argue that the Supremacy Clause, while mandating the
supremacy of federal law, also states that treaties share the status
of "Supreme Law of the Land."

In 2002, the United States joined over one hundred other nations in
ratifying the "Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of
the Child, regarding the involvement of children in armed conflict."
This treaty commits signatory nations to the principle that people
under the age of 18 should not be recruited into the armed forces.
The U.S. government signed the treaty, with the provision that they
reserved the right to recruit 17-year-olds. The cities have already
offered to settle the case by affirming that they will only enforce
the Youth Protection Act for minors under the age of 17, but that
offer was refused by the DOJ.

Spokesmen for Army recruiting repeatedly have said that they do not
actively recruit anyone who is not eligible for enlistment: That is
anyone under the age of 17. However, there are numerous documented
cases of local 15- and 16-year-olds who have been targeted for
recruitment into the military.

If representatives of the recruiting command state that they have a
policy of not initiating contact with kids under the age of 17, or of
ever pressuring kids to enlist, then why is it a violation of the
Supremacy Clause to codify such a policy?

One goal of an appeal is to get judicial comment on the cities'
arguments that was lacking in Judge Armstrong's ruling. This will
help to develop language that may be used in future local measures or
federal legislation.

Finally, the cities are arguing that, under the Supremacy Clause, the
U.S. Constitution reigns supreme.

The Ninth Amendment to the Constitution grants to the people rights
that are not otherwise enumerated in the Bill of Rights. Among these
is the right to privacy, which includes the right of parents to
protect their children from uninvited and inappropriate advances by
anyone, including military recruiters.

We, the Stop Recruiting Kids Coalition, as the proponents of the
measures, believe that the defense of measures F and J should be a
priority for the cities, in order to support the voter-approved will
of the people. Because respected attorneys from the Bay Area continue
to offer free legal representation, the cost to the cities will be
minimal, and the city councils should decide to appeal Judge
Armstrong's ruling and proceed with the defense of the measures.

We are asking Eureka and Arcata residents to urge their council
members to persevere in the defense of Measures F and J. We need to
appeal Judge Armstrong's ruling and state very clearly that we want
the federal government to "Stop Recruiting Kids!" in our community.
--

Dave Meserve is an Arcata resident and a former member of the Arcata
City Council.

.

Schools won't let Navy hold meeting at district site

[2 articles]

Schools won't let Navy hold meeting at district site

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/education/2009386057_navyflap26m.html

Seattle Public Schools refused to let the Navy hold a public meeting
at school- district headquarters Thursday, for reasons that the Navy
doesn't understand.

By Linda Shaw
Seattle Times education reporter
June 26, 2009

Seattle Public Schools refused to let the Navy hold a public meeting
at the school district's headquarters Thursday, for reasons the Navy
says it doesn't understand.

A school-district spokesman said the Navy didn't tell the district
until Wednesday that security would be needed at the meeting.

"There wasn't adequate time to provide the security staff they were
requesting," said district spokesman David Tucker.

Navy spokeswoman Sheila Murray, however, said district officials told
her they were concerned about protesters showing up for the meeting,
at which the Navy planned to solicit public views on environmental
issues involving a proposed weapons-loading wharf at Naval Base Kitsap-Bangor.

Murray also said district officials wouldn't allow the meeting to go
forward even after Navy officials and the Poulsbo Fire Department,
where a similar meeting was held Tuesday, assured them that
protesters who had shown up to date were peaceful and hadn't caused
any problems.

"We did try to explain to them, there really wasn't controversy," she said.

The meeting at the Seattle Public Schools headquarters was to be the
third of three public meetings about the proposed wharf, which the
Navy says it needs to ensure sufficient facilities to load and unload
missiles and perform other operations and upgrades for the Trident program.

The first meeting was held at the Poulsbo Fire Station Tuesday, the
second at a fire station in Port Ludlow.

The Navy had arranged in February to use the school district's
headquarters for the third meeting, Murray said, and the district
canceled the contract Wednesday.

Members of a peace group, Ground Zero, showed up at the two earlier
meetings with a huge, inflatable missile, Murray said, and the Navy
welcomed that. "They are just expressing their first Amendment
rights," she said.

The fake missile, she said, helped draw attention to the meeting in
Poulsbo, spurring "more public to come in and find out what was going on."

The Navy ended up moving its Thursday meeting to a nearby Starbucks building.

--------

Seattle Public Schools refuse to let Navy use space for a public meeting

http://www.examiner.com/x-1146-Seattle-Eastside-Family-Examiners~y2009m6d26-Seattle-Public-Schools-refuse-to-let-Navy-use-space-for-a-public-meeting

June 26, 2009

A new military controversy has arisen between the Seattle Public
Schools and the US Navy. The Navy had planned to hold a public
meeting last Thursday about the environmental impact of a possible
weapons-loading wharf at the Naval Base Kitsap-Bangor. The location
for the meeting was to be the Seattle Public School district
headquarters building, but the district denied the Navy the space.

According to a report in the Seattle Times, the issue was
security. The district worried they would be unable to provide
adequate security to deal with protestors who have demonstrated at
previous meetings. Ground Zero, a peace group, has showed up at
other Navy meetings with large, inflatable missiles. Sheila Murray,
spokesperson for the Navy, tried to reassure school district
officials that the protestors had been peaceful in the past and
caused no trouble, and that the Navy welcomes their protests: "They
are just expressing their first Amendment rights," she
said. District officials were unconvinced.

With no place to meet, The Navy held it's meeting at a nearby
Starbucks building.

This isn't the first controversy over military access to the Seattle
Public Schools. In 2007, the Seattle school board set limits on the
number of times military recruiters can access students on high
school campuses in the district. Although they originally considered
an all-out ban, they settled on two visits a year, which also applies
to college recruiters.


.

Board of Ed Restricts Military Recruiters' Access to Students

Board of Ed Restricts Military Recruiters' Access to Students

http://www.wnyc.org/news/articles/135103

WNYC Newsroom

NEW YORK, NY June 24, 2009 ­Military recruiters won't be given as
much free reign to high school students, under new regulations issued
by the City's Department of Education.

REPORTER: The federal No Child Left Behind Law requires school
districts to provide the names and contact information of 11th and
12th grade students to recruiters - except when families opt out. But
Udi Ofer, advocacy director for the New York Civil Liberties Union,
says principals didn't have clear regulations about how much access
to give recruiters.

OFER: And we heard complaints from principals and the DOE has
acknowledged that it has received complaints from principals about
overly aggressive military recruiters trying to gain access to schools.

REPORTER: The new policy says recruiters can't use class time. And
students and their families will get clear opt-out letters in eight
different languages.

.

Commander leads Army recruiters to success

Commander leads Army recruiters to success

http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=814460&category=REGION

By TERRY BROWN, Special to the Times Union
First published in print: Saturday, June 27, 2009

A colonel earned recognition for leading 250 recruiters in enlisting
enough soldiers to fill seven 500-person active Army battalions and
two Army Reserve battalions, the equivalent of three brigades.

Col. Kenneth Sullivan of Watervliet received a Meritorious Service
Medal in recognition of those achievements during a change of command
ceremony Friday at the Watervliet Arsenal.

Lt. Col. Thomas Finch of Watervliet assumed command of the Army's
Albany Recruiting Battalion from Sullivan.

Finch replaces Sullivan, who has been assigned as deputy commander of
the 1st Recruiting Brigade at Fort Meade, Md.

Sullivan earned the award while leading recruiters who cover upstate
New York, Vermont, Connecticut, Massachusetts west of Worcester, and
northern New Jersey.

Col. Frank Hall, 1st Recruiting Brigade commander, pinned the medal
on Sullivan. Sullivan's wife, Lisa, assisted as their children, Shea,
Cody and Army Pfc. Bryan stood nearby.

Brig. Gen. Joseph Anderson, deputy commander of Army Recruiting
Command, presented a letter of appreciation to Sullivan.

Sullivan earned the medal for "exemplary leadership, training, and
continued enforcement of the highest standards that led to the
enlistment of 3,367 soldiers in the regular Army and 1,168 in the
Army Reserve during a time of war," according to Maj. Gen. Thomas
Bostick, Army Recruiting commander.

Finch previously served as a military intelligence company commander,
Task Force Falcon, Camp Bondsteel, Kosovo.

As the new commander, Finch says, "Our priority will be to recruit
quality and qualified men and women for the U.S. Army."

Finch says other priorities include leadership development of his
Eagle Battalion soldiers as they perform their recruiting and other
missions with integrity, and taking care of soldiers' families.

Finch's other leadership positions included leader of Collection and
Jamming Platoon, 101st Military Intelligence Battalion, 1st Infantry
Division, Fort Riley, Kan.; commander of Collection and Jamming
Company, 501st Military Intelligence Battalion, 1st Armored Division,
Dexheim, Germany.

Finch received his commission in 1990 as a distinguished military
graduate of a Reserve Officers Training Corps program at Montana
State University where he earned a bachelor of science degree in
sociology and criminal justice. He also earned a master's degree in
administration from Central Michigan University. Finch also is
graduate of the Command and General Staff College.

His awards include three Meritorious Service medals, two Army
Commendation medals, three Army Achievement medals, a Joint
Meritorious Unit Award, an Army Superior Unit Award, an Airborne
Badge, and a Ranger Tab.

He and his wife, Jan Marie, have two children, Nathan and Elizabeth.

Sullivan's other awards include the Defense Meritorious Service
Medal, three other Meritorious Service medals, two Joint Service
Commendation medals and an Airborne Badge.

...
--

News of your soldiers and units can be sent to Duty Calls, Terry
Brown, Times Union, Box 15000, Albany, NY 12212 or by e-mail at
brownt@timesunion.com.

.

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Military Unites With Hollywood on ‘Transformers’

Military Unites With Hollywood on 'Transformers'

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=54875

By Joe Davidson
Special to American Forces Press Service

LOS ANGELES, June 23, 2009 – "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen"
hits theaters nationwide tomorrow as the culmination of more than a
year of Defense Department support, ranging from script and uniform
notes to C-17 aerial maneuvers and jumps from the Army's Golden
Knights parachute demonstration team.

The first Transformers film released in July 2007 used a variety of
Air Force assets. In the latest film, DreamWorks and Paramount
studios partnered with all four services to highlight America's
military members and combat power on the big screen. Deciding how and
why to work with the services was essential in making the film work,
producers said.

"There are really a lot of similarities between a military operation
and a movie production," said Army Lt. Col. Greg Bishop, the
department's project officer for the movie. "The mobility of the
operation, the logistics and planning required, and the
problem-solving skills required to pull the whole thing off are very
much alike."

Transformers executive producer and director Michael Bay has worked
with military leaders on other films and frequently consults with
them to make action sequences in his movies appear more authentic.

"You know the first thing we're going to look at is that if you're
going to fight these 32- to 125-foot robots, who else would you fight
them with?" Transformers producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura said.

Like its predecessors, the latest Transformers movie uses hundreds of
military members from all the services and from throughout the
country to make the film feel more realistic.

"I enjoyed being able to walk on the set and there are a hundred real
soldiers as opposed to walking on and it's a hundred actors from
Orange County or L.A. in fatigues," said Megan Fox, the film's female
lead actor. "It was just an overall pleasant experience, and I have
an immense amount of respect for the soldiers and for our troops."

That realism extends to military equipment as jet fighters roar from
the deck of an aircraft carrier to the recoiling sounds of M1-A1
Abrams tanks firing 120-mm rounds at their deceptive and at times
overpowering foes.

"What [the military] bring to it is obviously a sense of reality. But
for us what is most interesting about it is our interaction with
them," di Bonaventura said. "Because you actually get to see these
people who have made a life choice and the honesty of that choice
comes through each and every time you meet these guys. So, for us,
that's the really exciting thing. We get to hang out at the base and
see the joy they get out of being a part of us, and you also see us
get affected by their level of commitment."

This latest Transformers film shows an extreme example of what the
military does in everyday life.

"Though the 'enemy' in this film are alien robots, we strove to make
the depiction of operations as realistic and accurate as possible,"
said Capt. Bryon McGarry, the Air Force project officer for the
movie. "As in real-world operations, we go to 'war' against the
Decepticons in the film jointly to achieve coordinated, balanced and
devastating results. If they ever came to Earth, we'd be ready for them."

DreamWorks and Paramount pictures have given permission to provide
special screenings of "Transformers, Revenge of the Fallen" at bases
that provided support for the film and also aboard the USS John C. Stennis.
--

(Joe Davidson is assigned to The Space and Missile Systems Center at
Los Angeles Air Force Base).

.

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Judge tosses laws restricting recruiters

Judge tosses laws restricting recruiters

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/06/19/BAC3189PQJ.DTL

Matthew B. Stannard, Chronicle Staff Writer
Friday, June 19, 2009

Without fanfare, a federal judge in Oakland on Thursday threw out
voter-approved laws in two Northern California cities barring
military recruiters from contacting minors.

U.S. District Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong ruled that laws passed in
the Humboldt County cities of Arcata and Eureka in November were
unconstitutional and invalid.

The finding was not unexpected by proponents of the laws, which
passed with 73 percent of the vote in Arcata and 57 percent in
Eureka. The federal government quickly sued to overturn the laws,
which have been stayed ever since.

But Dave Meserve, the former Arcata councilman behind the laws, said
he was disappointed that the judge ruled without hearing arguments on
the case. Armstrong ruled on filed pleadings after a hearing
scheduled this month was canceled.

"She doesn't respond to any of our arguments in any way," he said.
"The order reads like a restatement of the government's case."

Department of Justice spokesman Charles Miller said "We are pleased
with the court's ruling."

Eileen Lainez, a spokeswoman for the Office of the Secretary of
Defense, declined tocomment on the suit but said, "It is important
for recruiters to provide information to youth and their parents."

The Arcata and Eureka laws join a long list of failed attempts to
restrict military recruiting.

Opponents of recruiting have tried to keep recruiters off college
campuses nationwide. Berkeley issued and then rescinded a letter
calling Marine recruiters "unwelcome intruders."

And the San Francisco school board in 2006 killed the local Junior
Reserve Officers' Training Corps, which some members saw as a
recruiting tool, launching a three-year battle that ended last month
with JROTC back in place.

The Arcata and Eureka laws represented a new tactic that experts said
appeared to have been the first of its kind in America: a
counter-recruitment law passed not by a handful of elected activists,
but by a plurality of voters.

Many voters in Arcata and Eureka who supported the measures saw the
laws not as anti-military, but as an expression of a community's
right to set its own rules - particularly relating to children.

Opponents said the laws were unpatriotic, pointlessly quixotic, and
imposed a government regulation on a domain that would be better
handled by parents.

The laws made it illegal to contact anyone under the age of 18 to
recruit that person into the military or promote future enlistment.
Minors could still initiate contact with recruiters if they chose.

"The judge said that the question of military recruitment is a
subject which must be regulated by the federal government and may not
be regulated by states and localities," said Stanford Law School
Senior Lecturer Allen Weiner, who read the opinion but did not take
part in the case.

Under the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution, federal laws
trump state laws on issues the federal government is responsible for,
like foreign affairs and national defense.

The cities tried to head off that finding by arguing that the United
States is party to international treaties prohibiting the recruiting
of children under 17. The treaties, the cities argue, hold equal
standing to the supremacy clause, so recruitment aimed at children
under 17 - such as posters or recruiter calls - is unconstitutional.

Armstrong did not address that argument. Brad Yamauchi, a San
Francisco attorney who represented Arcata pro bono, said the reason
she didn't may have been because the treaty addresses recruitment of
children under age 17, but the laws in Arcata and Eureka barred
recruiting anybody under 18.

Recruits must be 18 to enlist in the U.S. military, or 17 with
parental permission, although contact with recruiters may begin earlier.

If the cities choose to appeal or draft a new law, Yamauchi said,
they might focus on the 17-and-under crowd. But they would still need
to solve other constitutional concerns raised by Armstrong - a task
he said will be difficult at best.

But Yamauchi said an appeal might still be worth pursuing.

"Everything has to be done to put this pressure (on policymakers),
and having an appeal could be part of that pressure," he said. Arcata
City Attorney Nancy Diamond said the city has made no decision on
whether to pursue an appeal.

But Meserve said that no matter what, the effort was worthwhile.

"Whatever the outcome, I think it's been very positive," he said. "It
has opened people's eyes across the country to the fact that
recruiters target kids."
--

E-mail Matthew B. Stannard at mstannard@sfchronicle.com.

.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

We Won’t Go Back

We Won't Go Back

http://www.torontolife.com/features/we-wont-go-back/

To avoid serving in Iraq, 75 American soldiers have left their homes
and families and fled to Toronto By Maggie Gilmour

To avoid serving in Iraq, 300 American soldiers have left their homes
and families and fled to Canada, 75 of them to Toronto. Many assumed
they'd get a visa, settle down and live a normal life. But the
federal government has rejected their refugee claims and ordered them
deported. Some go into hiding; others wait for appeals and judicial
reviews of their cases. In the meantime, they've put down roots,
taking temp jobs and raising children, nostalgic for a time when
Canada was a haven for conscientious objectors.

Page 1 of 37

[Continued at URL above.]

.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Combat.com: The Military-Gamer Complex

Combat.com: The Military-Gamer Complex

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/6/12/741712/-Combat.com:-The-Military-Gamer-Complex

by mardod
Jun 12, 2009

Alex Rogan: That was just a game, Centauri!
Centauri: Well, you may have thought it was a game, but it was also a
test. Aha, a test! Sent out across the galaxy to find those with the
potential to be Starfighters. And here you are, my boy! Here you
are! -The Last Starfighter (1984)
--

So, how good are you at Halo? How about World of Warcraft, or any of
the other games where the strategic elimination of your enemy is a
key requisite in winning? Well, if you're really good at it, why not
do it full-time? Why not for the Army? Think I'm joking? The Army doesn't.

Set up in an impressive and unambiguous fashion, "America's Army" is
an online game developed in 2002 in partnership with the Department
of Defense (DoD) for the purpose of penetrating, "the youth culture
and get the Army in a young person's 'consideration set'", quoting
from an ACLU report citing testimony from a U.S. Senate Armed
Services Committee meeting.

Organized in an attractive and user-friendly interface for PC, Mac
and Linux platforms, the site offers all kinds of tidbits for
exploration including a section for news, soldier profiles, community
boards and even a Facebook group promoting the upcoming June 17
release of the version 3.0 software. Most importantly, though, are
the direct links to the Army's recruiting site. However, the game was
only the beginning.

Last year the DoD launched a new endeavor based on 10 years of work
and research that culminated in a pilot project called the Army
Experience Center (AEC), a 14,500 square foot, $12 million facility
in a Philadelphia mall that houses 20 permanent staff members and
resembles a gamers paradise of highly interactive gameplay in a war setting.

Opening in August 2008, the center had one purpose in mind; get kids
as young as 13 to play the games with an eye on measuring their
ability and strategic thinking and then encouraging them to enter
military service as soldiers. The staff, all recruiters, can offer
the recruit any number of services that ordinary offices cannot like
full mentoring and full GRE and ASVAP test preparation. According to
the website AfterDowningStreet (ADS), one AEC can do the work and
produce the results of 5 regular recruiting stations (although these
are early numbers). If deemed successful, ADS speculates that the
Army will begin building more throughout the U.S. "like Wal-Marts".

In testimony before the U.S. Senate's Armed Services Committee,
representatives of the program claim statistics that show 60% of
those who came to the AEC on a regular basis played the game five
times a week and from those, four out of 100 will sign up for service.

The program is becoming so popular that it's been noticed and
emulated by our allies overseas. Currently, the British Army is in
the process of creating their own version of the program. The British
program consists of promoting an online game called "Start Thinking
Soldier". The game, according to GamePolitics (one of the best sites
I've seen in quite some time) is aimed at the 68% of the 17-21 years
olds who have yet to make a career determination and are open to suggestions.

This may all sound fine to many people. Military service is an
honorable profession that thousands of people sign up for each year
for a multitude of reasons. However, there are a growing number of
civil liberty groups and activists on both sides of the ocean who are
beginning to push back at targeting kids as young as 13 for recruitment.

The ACLU has recently lodged a protest with the United Nations
(specifically the committee on the Rights of the Child) concerning
recruitment of children under the age of 18 by agents acting on
behalf of the military, claiming that such actions violate the
obligation the U.S. agreed to under the Optional Protocol on the
Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict. In their report they claim:

The Army uses an online video game, called "America's Army," to
attract young potential recruits at least as young as 13, train them
to use weapons, and engage in virtual combat and other military
missions. Video game-players complete obstacle courses, learn how to
fire realistic Army weapons such as automatic rifles and grenade
launchers, and learn how to jump from airplanes. As of September
2006, 7.5 million users were registered on the game's website. As of
February 2005, the Pentagon was investing about $6 million each year
in the video game.

In its defense, the Army's representative was asked (in an interview
with The New York Times) about the restrictions on younger kids to
which they responded:

"We have a Teen rating that allows 13-year-olds to play, and in order
to maintain that rating we have to adhere to certain standards.We
don't use blood and gore and violence to entertain. That's not the
purpose of our game.We want to reach young people to show them what
the Army does, and we're obviously proud of that. We can't reach them
if we are over the top with violence and other aspects of war that
might not be appropriate. It's a choice we made to be able to reach
the audience we want."

The answer, however, glosses over larger questions. Recently, the
U.S. Congress has been threatening to hold hearings on the use of
violence in video games, believing it to be excessive and harmful to
younger audiences who could become desensitized to violent
situations. Will they then call the makers of "America's Army" to
testify? Secondly, what are the ethical guidelines when recruiting
those under the age of 17? Is someone younger than 17 really able to
make an informed decision about their future? It appears that in an
race to keep recruitment numbers on pace, proponents have been
playing fast and loose with the country's international obligations
rather than heeding them.

.

More graduates choosing military career

More graduates choosing military career

http://www.fremonttribune.com/articles/2009/06/13/news/local/doc4a33378c33797837746708.txt

By Brett Ellis/Fremont Tribune
Saturday, Jun 13, 2009

Cameron Carlson was all set to go to college after he graduated from
high school.

That's until a Navy recruiter showed up at his high school in March.

Carlson, who graduated in May from Oakland-Craig, listened to the
recruiter talk about the benefits of joining the Navy - including
some major financial perks.

So now instead of heading to Lincoln in the fall to go to college,
Carlson will go to Chicago for basic training in August.

"After he came and told me the options, I did a lot of research and
talked to my parents about it," Carlson said. "It was a pretty easy decision."

Carlson is just one of several recent high school graduates opting
for the armed forces instead of more schooling or entering the workforce.

While Carlson cited financial concerns as one of the big reasons in
his decision, others - like Arlington graduate Lacea Keller - simply
like the opportunities a military career can offer.

"I have really good discipline, I think, and I absolutely love the
benefits you get when you retire," said Keller, who also is joining the Navy.

Keller also is following in her family's footsteps. Her mother and
father, along with a grandpa, all served in the Air Force.

But, Keller said, they didn't put any pressure on her to join that
branch of the military.

"They just kind of left it up to me," she said.

In fact, Keller's family tried to encourage her to go to college.

"I told them I wasn't going back to school and I told them the
military was more my style," Keller said.

Some people, though, need more convincing. That's where people like
Sgt. Jose Moreno come in.

Moreno has been at the Marines recruiting office in Fremont since
February. He works with students from Wisner to Omaha.

He said that the economy isn't the only factor driving students to
join the military.

"A lot of people assume that it's because of the economy ... but
we've got a really good product within the Marine Corps," Moreno
said. "It sells itself."

There was a time when recruiters like Moreno would have spent their
days making phone call after phone call and sending out information
through the mail to prospective recruits.

Now, though, there is a push to use the Internet and other media to
reach out to those students.

"Kids are more prone to electronics than receiving something in the
mail," Moreno said.

Moreno has found that the biggest concern many high school students
he visits with have is the notoriously-tough Marines boot camp.

Older recruits are more concerned with things like benefits and money
for college, Moreno said.

The ongoing war in Iraq also has led many young people to want to
enlist in the military.

"Everyone wants to do their part and help out and serve their
country," Moreno said. "That's a very noble, honorable thing to do."

.

Uncle Sam wants you -- maybe

Uncle Sam wants you -- maybe

http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_12587928?nclick_check=1

By Rachel Raskin-Zrihen/Times-Herald staff writer
Posted: 06/13/2009

Nicholas Graves of Vallejo said he believes in a higher power, so,
although he knows the risks, he's joining the military anyway.

The 18-year-old said he realizes he could become the target of an
enemy bullet, but the military is a steady job with reasonable pay,
an attractive option in a bad economy.

While few local military recruiters are willing to credit the
struggling economy, they say they've seen a spike in recent years in
the number of enlistments.

The recent interest has allowed recruiters to be pickier, local Army
recruiter Drew Radke said.

"We adjust our criteria to changes that come down the road," Radke
said. "Now there are more people trying to join because of the
recession, but more aren't qualifying."

The educational and medical criteria haven't changed, but what the
Army calls its "moral criteria" has tightened, Radke said.

Young people who think they may some day want to join the Army need
to consider their actions long before that time comes, he said.

"Some people assume the military is a last choice -- a last resort --
and sometimes they do things that disqualify them from the military,"
Radke said. "They're looking more closely now at the whole person.
It's more about, 'Would I trust this person to work with me?' "

Army Reserves recruiter Sgt. Gerold Garland, who works in the Vallejo
office, said enlistment requirements are stricter.

He added, however, that there's sometimes leeway in the reserves for
those whose past behavior might bar them from regular Army service.

"Fewer non-high school graduates are getting in, partly because jobs
on the outside are getting harder to come by," Garland said. But to
those with few options, the reserves are still a viable one. It's one
reason he finds his job rewarding, he said.

"I like that we're able to give direction to people who don't know
where they're going," Garland said.

New recruit Graves said he was seeking guidance and found the Army.
"I need the discipline. And the free education sounds good," the
Vallejo Adult School student said.

Ignacio Molina, 19, of Vallejo, was a Mare Island Technology Academy
senior with plenty of options when he enlisted. "I'm joining the Army
because I've wanted to for a long time," Molina said. "I love a
challenge. I have family members in the Army and I'm continuing the legacy."

Neither youth expressed concern about getting hurt as soldiers.

"Everything happens for a reason," Molina said.

American Canyon City Councilman Ed West, whose 19-year-old son
Phillip was killed in Fallujah, Iraq, in 2004, said the number of
young people opting for the military has grown so significantly, most
are turned away.

"I understand that more people are interested in joining the service
because they can see the value in the opportunity, especially with
the weak economy," West said. "But I understand (the Army) only takes
about 3 percent of applicants. Not everyone qualifies."

Carrie Chandler, an 18-year-old Vallejo High School junior, and the
single mother of 11/2-year-old Caraleigha, enlisted in December. "I
always wanted to join the Army Reserves," she said. "It's exciting
for me and I finally have a chance to do it."

Chandler, who signed up to be a supply sergeant, said her brother and
sister have agreed to care for her daughter while she's away in
training or deployment. She said she hopes her work in the military
may some day translate into a retail career.

Radke and Garland said signing bonuses, which range from $10,000 to
$40,000 depending on the job, have always been an effective
recruiting tool. Recruits also can get more than $80,000 for college,
they said.

Travis Air Force Base Tech Sgt. Donald Osborn said most of the time
there's a "transition period" between signing up and getting started
that is tied to the recruit's chosen field. The lag time can be up to
a year, he said.

"It has to do with what the recruit wants to be trained in and when
there will be room in that technical school," he said.

While enlistment criteria has tightened some since the recession took
hold, the U.S. Air Force has never had problems getting people to
join, Vallejo's recruiter Erica Johnson said.

"In the five years I've been recruiting, the goals have increased,
but we continue to find the quality young men and women we're looking
for," U.S. Air Force Chief Master Sgt. Jason Petersen said.

The Air Force offers few signing bonuses. "It's not something we have
to do to recruit," he said.

California National Guard recruiter Sgt. Brian White, who works in
the Fairfield office, said enlistment is up and some criteria have
tightened, but this likely has more to do with patriotism than the
recession. He said more members are choosing to stay in the service
and the maximum sign-up age was lowered in April from 42 to 35.
Higher entrance test scores are also required now, he said.

"Many of these kids are right out of high school and they want to
serve their county," added National Guard spokesman Jon Guibord.
"Recruitment's been up since 9/11."

A local Coast Guard recruiter who declined to reveal his name, said
his service branch is also seeing more people wanting in, and fewer
leaving once their tours are up.

"There's a huge amount of interest now, and I understand that nine
out of 10 are choosing to stay in," he said. "I hear it's higher than
ever before."

The Coast Guard 's maximum enlistment age of 27 hasn't changed, but
some criteria have gotten tougher. "They've raised the minimum test
score at the beginning of this fiscal year," he said. "They've gotten
much pickier."

The signing bonus the Coast Guard once offered also was discontinued
a couple of months ago in the Bay Area recruiting station, though
this recruiter said he doesn't know if this is true elsewhere.

Kelly Walker of Tracy, 24, serves in the Coast Guard at the Vallejo
Station. She said she's been with the Coast Guard about 11/2 years.

"I was living in Florida, bartending, and that got old fast," Walker
said to explain why she joined the Coast Guard. "I had done Sea
Cadets as a kid and really liked that, and I wanted to find a career."

Walker said she considered the Navy, but settled on the Coast Guard
and has not regretted her decision. She said she especially enjoys
the search and rescue and law enforcement aspects of the job.

"I'm glad I joined when I did. I have a roommate who lost her job and
that's an eye-opener," she added. "Compared to people trying to hack
it in the real world, this is great."
--

Contact staff writer Rachel Raskin-Zrihen at 553-6824 or
RachelZ@thnewsnet.com.Contact staff writer Rachel Raskin-Zrihen at
553-6824 or RachelZ@thnewsnet.com.

.

For 3 Irondequoit grads, military is right fit

For 3 Irondequoit grads, military is right fit

http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20090614/NEWS01/906140360/1002/NEWS

Stephanie Veale
June 14, 2009

The weights above 17-year-old Dan Fittos' head are 135 pounds, and
he's just about had it with bench-pressing for the day.

His friend, Dan Trommer, stands behind his head, spotting him,
encouraging him to do one more. Just one.

"Breathe out as you're pushing up," Trommer said.

Both Irondequoit High School seniors are exhausted, a function of
insomnia and too much homework. It's early May and end-of-the-year
projects are piling up, but ditching the high school fitness room for
the afternoon isn't an option. These workouts have a defined purpose
with a date attached: In a few weeks, Fittos and Trommer will be
doing push-ups for a drill sergeant. They are among the U.S. Army's
newest recruits.

Fittos will be a Black Hawk helicopter mechanic. Trommer, 18, will be
an airborne ranger, one of the troops who jump out of airplanes.
Their other close friend and fellow Irondequoit senior, 18-year-old
Eric Hebing, will be a chaplain assistant. All three will ship off to
basic training this summer, as most suburban high school graduates
save up money for school and await freshman roommate assignments.

All three likely will see combat. By the time their former classmates
face first-semester midterms, the recruits could be in Iraq,
Afghanistan or on a military base somewhere on the other side of the world.

More than 630 high school seniors in Monroe County have joined the
four major branches of the armed forces since 2004, according to data
provided by local Army officials. The highest numbers of high school
recruits come from Webster and western suburbs including Parma,
Greece and Ogden.

The role of military recruiters in schools has been hotly debated ­
on both the local and national stage ­ in recent months.

In this region, the debate has been loudest in the Rochester School
District, where the school board is weighing whether to modify its
"opt-in" policy.

Parents currently must give the OK before their children's contact
information can be released to the military. The policy has been
criticized by some as violating the federal No Child Left Behind Act.

In most area school districts, student information is released to
recruiters unless a parent prohibits it. Recruiters are often
afforded the same access as college representatives. At Irondequoit
High School, military recruiters are invited to set up a table in the
commons area three times a year. Students can speak with the
recruiters during lunch periods.

The City School District's restrictive policy may be affecting the
number of Rochester teens joining the military. Five-year enlistment
totals within city ZIP codes trail those in most surrounding suburbs,
even though the city has the largest school district in the county.

Trommer, Fittos and Hebing say they're joining the Army because they
want the structure, because they're not cut out for academics,
because they believe they'll find meaning in the work the Army offers
them. The decision isn't a gut reaction to 9/11, which prompted many
to enlist seven or eight years ago. For these young men, 9/11
happened almost half a lifetime ago, when they were too young to
understand what it meant.

Corene Fittos, who raised Dan almost entirely on her own, has spent
the past nine months fretting about his grades. Now, with graduation
in sight, there's no way to deny what's coming. Her son will leave
for basic training in six weeks, and she's already missing him. He
doesn't eat dinner with her anymore the way he used to.

"He's decided to be with his friends as opposed to being home," she
said. "So I just have to let him, let it be. Let him get it out. It's
been very stressful ... it hasn't been easy this year."

The decision

Sometime during his sophomore year, Dan Trommer watched a cable TV
program about a Special Forces team in Iraq. He liked what he saw.
His brother, Joel, had recently joined the Army National Guard. The
pieces were falling into place. He wanted in. Trommer sees military
service as a family tradition. His uncles served. His father, a
Vietnam veteran, would tell the occasional war story. When Trommer
was 13, his father and mother divorced, and Trommer has no idea where
his dad lives now. Still, military service became part of both the
Trommer sons' identities. Joel Trommer is expected to go to Iraq
within the year.

Dan Trommer first got a call from Army recruiter Staff Sgt. Ryan
Kennedy during his junior year of high school. He didn't meet with
Kennedy right away, partly because his mother, Veronica, balked at
the idea of her second son joining the military. But in the fall of
Trommer's senior year, Kennedy called back, and this time, Trommer
agreed to meet him at the recruiting station in BayTowne Plaza.

Kennedy, a 2002 Greece Athena graduate, spent 26 months in Iraq and
has earned his bachelor's degree since enlisting seven years ago.
Last year, he was asked to become a recruiter in his hometown for a
three-year stint.

Kennedy met with Trommer, his mom and his brother last fall, shortly
after their first meeting at the recruiting station. He told the
family that if Trommer signed up during high school, he would get
about $1,000 in bonus money every month until he graduated. He'd also
have time to work up to promotions before starting basic training.

Veronica Trommer signed the papers in October. She knew her son would
join regardless of whether she chose to support him. Months later,
she's gotten used to the idea, but she's still "not crazy about it,"
Dan Trommer said.

"A few days ago, she was telling me how she's going to miss me when
I'm gone and how she's going to be a basket case," Trommer said. "I
try to tell her not to worry, I'll be fine. But of course, her being
a mother, she's protective."

'This is what he wants'

After Trommer's mom signed him into the Army, Kennedy urged him to
get other friends on board. If Trommer got anyone else to join,
Kennedy told him, he would be eligible for a promotion.

Dan Fittos had already been considering the military when Trommer
talked to him. Fittos didn't join until a few months after the chat,
and he denies he was persuaded by any one person. But because Trommer
presumably played a role in his friend's decision, Trommer was
promoted after Fittos enlisted.

Fittos' decision to enlist wasn't a surprise to his mother. He had
thrown around the idea for years. He'd been struggling with school
since ninth grade, the year he and his mom moved from the city to Irondequoit.

Still, Corene Fittos hung on to the dream that her son would go to
college. After graduating from East High School, Corene never went to
college, and in some ways she wishes she had. While she's happy with
her job as a sales associate for VP Supply, working for a plumbing
supply company is the only thing she's ever done.

"I want him to have choices," she said.

The military, he's told her, is his choice. School was never his
choice. That's partly why Corene Fittos, like Veronica Trommer,
signed the papers so her son could enlist at 17. She is preoccupied
most of all with her son's safety.

Has he thought about what might happen if he ends up in Afghanistan
or Iraq? Of course, he said.

"The way I see it is, if I have to die for my country, that's the way
I want to die. Dying for your country ­ if that's what happens ­ I'm
all right with that. I didn't join thinking I wouldn't be on active
duty. I wasn't oblivious to the fact that it's a time of war, and at
war, people have to sacrifice."

His mother says she tries from time to time to talk to him about
what's at stake here.

"It has no impact," she said. "I ask him, 'What if you lose an arm,
or a leg? What are you going to do then?' It just doesn't affect him.
He's made his mind up; it's his decision. This is what he wants. So I
have to and I will support him."

The right reasons

Eric Hebing will be the first of his friends to go to basic training.
He leaves in 16 days.

He said he joined the military so he could help people. His job
options were somewhat limited because he is colorblind, but he still
managed to find a profession that fits his goals. As a chaplain
assistant, he'll provide support to Army ministry. He will double as
a bodyguard in dangerous situations.

Hebing said his grades have been good, but he can't imagine going
straight into four more years of school.

"Growing up, I always thought about doing the Army, so I could help
out and do something for my country," Hebing said.

Hebing began serious research on the military in September. He met
with Kennedy and asked what the Army could offer. In October, he enlisted.

While Hebing was set on a stint in the military, some students have
more reservations.

Brandon Fox, a guidance counselor at Penfield High School, went to a
Marine Corps basic training workshop for educators four years ago
because he didn't have a good sense of what joining the military
entailed. He wanted to give better feedback when students broached
enlistment as a post-graduation plan.

Now, he knows what they'll face in basic training if they enlist. He
has a better idea of what recruiters are looking for. He can help
students figure out if the military is the best option.

"I like to find out what information they have and where they got it
from, and find out the reason for their choice, just because it is
such a large and very possibly dangerous commitment," Fox said.

At least five Penfield High School seniors will be going into the
Marine Corps after graduation, Fox said, though military enlistments
are relatively uncommon. Ninety percent of the Penfield class of 2008
enrolled in a two- or four-year college.

Irondequoit High School reports similar numbers: 94 percent of last
year's graduating seniors went to college. West Irondequoit district
spokeswoman Carol Crumlish said that as far as she knows, Trommer,
Fittos and Hebing are the only members of the class of 2009 who have
enlisted in the military. One other student may be considering the
option, she said.

One week from today, all three are expected to walk across the stage
and receive their diplomas. Eric Hebing leaves June 30 for basic
training at Fort Jackson, S.C. Dan Fittos will join him there July
22. And Dan Trommer ships off to basic training at Fort Benning, Ga.,
on July 23.

Some people at school have questioned the young men for becoming
soldiers. Certain classmates, Hebing said, have gone as far as
calling him stupid for signing up.

What they don't realize is that he's signing up, in part, to protect
them ­ the very people who are criticizing his choice.

Kennedy said he can imagine 20-year military careers for all three of
these recruits. By the age of 38, Trommer, Fittos and Hebing will be
able to retire with a full pension.

"These guys know what they want," Kennedy said. "They're going to be
great assets to the Army, and they're going to be very successful."
--

STVEALE@DemocratandChronicle.com

.

Monday, June 15, 2009

Irregular Army: 10-part collection of essays

Irregular Army: 10-part collection of essays

http://www.thecommentfactory.com/irregular-army-10-part-collection-of-essays-2141

By Matt Kennard'
April 24, 2009

"Remember why we have a military. The reason is to be prepared to
fight and win wars. That is our basic, fundamental mission. The
military is not a social welfare agency, it is not a jobs program. We
aren't there to run social experiments. We are there to fight and win wars."
--Then-Secretary of Defense, Dick Cheney, 1992

"Building tomorrow's force is not going to be easy. Changing the
direction of our military is like changing the course of a mighty ship."
--President George W. Bush, May 2001

"He served up our great military a huge bowl of chicken feces, and
ever since then, our military and our country have been trying to
turn this bowl into chicken salad."
--General John Batiste, commander in Iraq, on Donald Rumsfeld, 2006

As of September 2008, 1.6 million Americans had served their country
in the twin wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. That's one in every 200
Americans, or a military bigger than the population of a country like
Estonia or a city like Philadelphia. But in spite of this
astronomical number of serving Americans, the Bush administration
never dared institute a policy of mass conscription, a deeply
unpopular political move for an already unpopular government.

The void has been partly filled by subcontracting operations out to
private military institutions, like Blackwater and DynCorp, who have
received billions of dollars in government largesse to populate the
frontlines in the War on Terror. The thin coalition of countries, now
incorporating NATO in Afghanistan and the U.N. in Iraq, have also
helped ameliorate the chronic troop needs.

But this patchwork hasn't been anywhere near enough. Maintaining an
all-volunteer force while overseeing an occupation force of 140,000
in Iraq and 30,000 in Afghanistan, has meant that the U.S. military
has had to change irrevocably over the past seven years and the men
and women pulling on the fatigues have got an unprecedented facelift.

In the halcyon days of the First Gulf War in 1990, the U.S. military
blocked the enlistment of felons, they spurned men and women with low
IQ's, and would kick out neo-Nazis, gang-members, the obese,
alcoholics, drug abusers, and the mentally ill. No more.

Conservative on pretty much every issue of state, the Bush
administration has saved its liberalism for the U.S. military, where
it has scrapped all the most sacred regulations governing the most
powerful fighting force in the world, from weight restrictions to
addiction to insanity. Under the aegis of the War on Terror, the U.S.
armed forces have become a Mecca for the 'different', the weird and
wonderful (and dangerous) of Americana.

In the cascade of books about private military contractors and the
effects of Afghanistan and Iraq on the changing nature of warfare in
the 21st century, there has been nothing which has catalogued the
most obvious: the new texture of the U.S. military, which has become
inexorably divorced from the pervasive mythology of young idealistic
warriors spreading enlightenment values to the dark corners of the
world. Instead, neo-Nazis break bread with gangbangers in Baghdad and
alcoholics sup 'Haji juice' with the mentally ill in Falluja.

Only one in three men in the general population met the pre-9/11
physical, mental, educational, and other eligibility requirements in
the armed forces. To re-enfranchize the other two-thirds, the U.S.
military had to change in profound ways not seen the Vietnam War. The
results have been astounding, not only for the young Americans in the
desert, but also the inhabitants of the countries that have been
occupied by the U.S. armed forces over the past five years.
--

The first essay next week will look into the changing treatment of
homosexual soldiers during the War on Terror.
--

Irregular Army: The rise of mental illness in the US military
http://www.thecommentfactory.com/irregular-army-the-prevalence-of-mental-illness-in-the-us-military-2217

Irregular Army: The rise of homosexuals in the US military
http://www.thecommentfactory.com/irregular-army-the-rise-of-homosexuals-in-the-us-military-2174

Irregular Army: The rise of fatties in the US military
http://www.thecommentfactory.com/irregular-army-the-rise-of-fatties-in-the-us-military-2225

Irregular Army: The rise of assorted criminals and felons in the US military
http://www.thecommentfactory.com/irregular-army-the-rise-of-assorted-criminals-and-felons-in-the-us-military-2183

.

I want out

I want out

http://gauntlet.ucalgary.ca/story/13621

Rhiannon Kirkland
Gauntlet News
June 11, 2009

When Josh Stieber was deployed in February 2007 as a part of the
surge in Iraq, he was unaware that what he was going to experience
would change who he was and how he saw the world around him. He came
back transformed into an advocate of non-violence and opposed to the
surge he had been deployed as a part of.

Stieber joined the US army thinking that he was going to prevent
terrorism and liberate the Iraqi people.

"I saw things very black and white, like I thought that pretty much
whatever my country decided to do was going to be the right answer
and thought, that you know, because of 911, any action that we took
would be justified," said Stieber.

Stieber's experiences in Iraq made him question his previous beliefs.
He found that because of the asymmetrical nature of the war ,it was
hard to separate out the people he was supposed to be fighting from
the rest of the population.

"You don't know who's going to attack you and a lot of times, when
you get hit or attacked, you don't even see who did it," said
Stieber. "Often times you end up attacking and hurting the people who
had nothing to do with it."

"I learned a lot more about people and that it doesn't matter what
country you're from or if you have a uniform on or not, it's about
how you treat people," said Stieber. "I guess the idea of trying to
force everyone into liking you or agreeing with you is not the way to
go about things and often creates more enemies and more problems than
it solves. "

Stieber was in Iraq for fourteen months. During his deployment he was
an infantryman and was worked as a humvee driver, as a gunner, a
detainee guard and a radio operator.

Stieber is on a tour of the US to promote non-violence and
alternatives to force. His tour began on May 27th. Stieber plans to
cover between 4000 and 5000 miles by foot and bicycle. And expects
that his tour will take about eight months to complete.

"If I'm saying the military is the wrong way to solve problems, then
I need to show what the right answer is, so this trip is about
visiting a lot of different organizations that focus on bring people
together and being proactive and dedicated to solving problems in the
world non-violently," said Stieber.

As Stieber travels across the US, he plans to showcase twelve
charitable organizations. Stieber selected organizations with goals
ranging from fundraising for childhood cancer to recycling old
bicycles to micro lending.

"My first focus was illustrating the power of individuals and showing
that it's not only the government or the president or the generals or
whatever who make decisions and who affect things but that common
ordinary people can change things," said Stieber. "I tried to look
for organizations that brought people together."

Throughout his tour, Stieber will be encouraging people to
participate in a letter writing campaign. The sample letter
encourages soldiers to treat civilians with respect and patience.

"Thinking back to my experience in Iraq, you get a constant stream of
letters and encouragement that say 'keep using force and violence as
a way to solve problems'. One quote I got sent throughout my
deployment was 'we can sleep in peace at night because brave men are
willing to do violence on our behalf'," said Stieber. "The letter
writing campaign is encouraging people in the peace community to
respectfully and gently say they appreciate soldiers for the energy
and effort that they're putting in, but also to respectfully offer a
different point of view and to break that chain of encouragement to
keep using violence."

After returning home, Stieber applied for conscientious objector
status. The investigation into the sincerity of Stieber's claim would
take nearly a year before it was approved.

"As of yet, I don't think I've met anyone who's critized me," said
Stieber. "I've gotten different people who are just curious about
what I'm doing, some people who think it's a great idea, people who
just ask a lot of questions, so far it's been very positive."

.

Neo-Nazis are in the Army now

[See URL for embedded links.]

Neo-Nazis are in the Army now

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/06/15/neo_nazis_army/

Why the U.S. military is ignoring its own regulations and permitting
white supremacists to join its ranks.

Editor's note: Research support for this article was provided by the
Nation Institute's Investigative Fund.

By Matt Kennard
June 15, 2009

On a muggy Florida evening in 2008, I meet Iraq War veteran Forrest
Fogarty in the Winghouse, a little bar-restaurant on the outskirts of
Tampa, his favorite hangout. He told me on the phone I would
recognize him by his skinhead. Sure enough, when I spot a white guy
at a table by the door with a shaved head, white tank top and bulging
muscles, I know it can only be him.

Over a plate of chicken wings, he tells me about his path into the
white-power movement. "I was 14 when I decided I wanted to be a
Nazi," he says. At his first high school, near Los Angeles, he was
bullied by black and Latino kids. That's when he first heard
Skrewdriver, a band he calls "the godfather of the white power
movement." "I became obsessed," he says. He had an image from one of
Skrewdriver's album covers ­ a Viking carrying a staff, an icon among
white nationalists ­ tattooed on his left forearm. Soon after he had
another white power symbol, a Celtic cross, emblazoned on his stomach.

At 15, Fogarty moved with his dad to Tampa, where he started picking
fights with groups of black kids at his new high school. "On the
first day, this bunch of niggers, they thought I was a racist, so
they asked, 'Are you in the KKK?'" he tells me. "I said, 'Yeah,' and
it was on." Soon enough, he was expelled.

For the next six years, Fogarty flitted from landscaping job to
construction job, neither of which he'd ever wanted to do. "I was
just drinking and fighting," he says. He started his own Nazi rock
group, Attack, and made friends in the National Alliance, at the time
the biggest neo-Nazi group in the country. It has called for a "a
long-term eugenics program involving at least the entire populations
of Europe and America."

But the military ran in Fogarty's family. His grandfather had served
during World War II, Korea and Vietnam, and his dad had been a Marine
in Vietnam. At 22, Fogarty resolved to follow in their footsteps. "I
wanted to serve my country," he says.

Army regulations prohibit soldiers from participating in racist
groups, and recruiters are instructed to keep an eye out for
suspicious tattoos. Before signing on the dotted line, enlistees are
required to explain any tattoos. At a Tampa recruitment office,
though, Fogarty sailed right through the signup process. "They just
told me to write an explanation of each tattoo, and I made up some
stuff, and that was that," he says. Soon he was posted to Fort
Stewart in Georgia, where he became part of the 3rd Infantry Division.

Fogarty's ex-girlfriend, intent on destroying his new military
career, sent a dossier of photographs to Fort Stewart. The photos
showed Fogarty attending white supremacist rallies and performing
with his band, Attack. "They hauled me before some sort of committee
and showed me the pictures," Fogarty says. "I just denied them and
said my girlfriend was a spiteful bitch." He adds: "They knew what I
was about. But they let it go because I'm a great soldier."

In 2003, Fogarty was sent to Iraq. For two years he served in the
military police, escorting officers, including generals, around the
hostile country. He says he was granted top-secret clearance and
access to battle plans. Fogarty speaks with regret that he "never had
any kill counts." But he says his time in Iraq increased his racist resolve.

"I hate Arabs more than anybody, for the simple fact I've served over
there and seen how they live," he tells me. "They're just a backward
people. Them and the Jews are just disgusting people as far as I'm
concerned. Their customs, everything to do with the Middle East, is
just repugnant to me."

Because of his tattoos and his racist comments, most of his buddies
and his commanding officers were aware of his Nazism. "They all knew
in my unit," he says. "They would always kid around and say, 'Hey,
you're that skinhead!'" But no one sounded an alarm to higher-ups. "I
would volunteer for all the hardest missions, and they were like,
'Let Fogarty go.' They didn't want to get rid of me."

Fogarty left the Army in 2005 with an honorable discharge. He says he
was asked to reenlist. He declined. He was sick of the system.

Since the launch of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the U.S.
military has struggled to recruit and reenlist troops. As the
conflicts have dragged on, the military has loosened regulations,
issuing "moral waivers" in many cases, allowing even those with
criminal records to join up. Veterans suffering post-traumatic stress
disorder have been ordered back to the Middle East for second and
third tours of duty.

The lax regulations have also opened the military's doors to
neo-Nazis, white supremacists and gang members ­ with drastic
consequences. Some neo-Nazis have been charged with crimes inside the
military, and others have been linked to recruitment efforts for the
white right. A recent Department of Homeland Security report,
"Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling
Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment," stated: "The
willingness of a small percentage of military personnel to join
extremist groups during the 1990s because they were disgruntled,
disillusioned, or suffering from the psychological effects of war is
being replicated today." Many white supremacists join the Army to
secure training for, as they see it, a future domestic race war.
Others claim to be shooting Iraqis not to pursue the military's
strategic goals but because killing "hajjis" is their duty as white militants.

Soldiers' associations with extremist groups, and their racist
actions, contravene a host of military statutes instituted in the
past three decades. But during the "war on terror," U.S. armed forces
have turned a blind eye on their own regulations. A 2005 Department
of Defense report states, "Effectively, the military has a 'don't
ask, don't tell' policy pertaining to extremism. If individuals can
perform satisfactorily, without making their extremist opinions overt
… they are likely to be able to complete their contracts."

Carter F. Smith is a former military investigator who worked with the
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command from 2004 to 2006, when he
helped to root out gang violence in troops. "When you need more
soldiers, you lower the standards, whether you say so or not," he
says. "The increase in gangs and extremists is an indicator of this."
Military investigators may be concerned about white supremacists, he
says. "But they have a war to fight, and they don't have incentive to
slow down."

Tom Metzger is the former grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan and
current leader of the White Aryan Resistance. He tells me the
military has never been more tolerant of racial extremists. "Now they
are letting everybody in," he says.

The presence of white supremacists in the military first triggered
concern in 1976. At Camp Pendleton in California, a group of black
Marines attacked white Marines they mistakenly believed to be in the
KKK. The resulting investigation uncovered a KKK chapter at the base
and led to the jailing or transfer of 16 Klansmen. Reports of Klan
activity among soldiers and Marines surfaced again in the 1980s,
spurring President Reagan's Defense Secretary, Caspar Weinberger, to
condemn military participation in white supremacist organizations.

Then, in 1995, a black couple was murdered by two neo-Nazi
paratroopers around Fort Bragg in North Carolina. The murder
investigation turned up evidence that 22 soldiers at Fort Bragg were
known to be extremists. That year, language was added to a Department
of Defense directive, explicitly prohibiting participation in
"organizations that espouse supremacist causes" or "advocate the use
of force or violence."

Today a complete ban on membership in racist organizations appears to
have been lifted ­ though the proliferation of white supremacists in
the military is difficult to gauge. The military does not track them
as a discrete category, coupling them with gang members. But one
indication of the scope comes from the FBI.

Following an investigation of white supremacist groups, a 2008 FBI
report declared: "Military experience ­ ranging from failure at basic
training to success in special operations forces ­ is found
throughout the white supremacist extremist movement." In white
supremacist incidents from 2001 to 2008, the FBI identified 203
veterans. Most of them were associated with the National Alliance and
the National Socialist Movement, which promote anti-Semitism and the
overthrow of the U.S. government, and assorted skinhead groups.

Because the FBI focused only on reported cases, its numbers don't
include the many extremist soldiers who have managed to stay off the
radar. But its report does pinpoint why the white supremacist
movements seek to recruit veterans ­ they "may exploit their accesses
to restricted areas and intelligence or apply specialized training in
weapons, tactics, and organizational skills to benefit the extremist movement."

In fact, since the movement's inception, its leaders have encouraged
members to enlist in the U.S. military as a way to receive
state-of-the-art combat training, courtesy of the U.S. taxpayer, in
preparation for a domestic race war. The concept of a race war is
central to extremist groups, whose adherents imagine an eruption of
violence that pits races against each other and the government.

That goal comes up often in the chatter on white supremacist Web
sites. On the neo-Nazi Web site Blood and Honour, a user called
88Soldier88, wrote in 2008 that he is an active duty soldier working
in a detainee holding area in Iraq. He complained about "how 'nice'
we have to treat these fucking people … better than our own troops."
Then he added, "Hopefully the training will prepare me for what I
hope is to come." Another poster, AMERICANARYAN.88Soldier88, wrote,
"I have the training I need and will pass it on to others when I get out."

On NewSaxon.org, a social networking group for neo-Nazis, a group
called White Military Men hosts numerous contributors. It was begun
by "FightingforWhites," who identified himself at one point as Lance
Cpl. Burton of the 2nd Battalion Fox Company, but then removed the
information. The group calls for "All men with military experience,
retired or active/reserve" to "join this group to see how many men
have experience to build an army. We want to win a war, we need
soldiers." FightingforWhites ­ whose tagline is "White Supremacy will
prevail! US Military leading the way!" ­ goes on to write, "I am with
an infantry battalion in the Marine Corps, I have had the pleasure of
killing four enemies that tried to kill me. I have the best training
to kill people." On his wall, a friend wrote: "THANKS BROTHER!!!!
kill a couple towel heads for me ok!"

Such attitudes come straight from the movement's leaders. "We do
encourage them to sign up for the military," says Charles Wilson,
spokesman for the National Socialist Movement. "We can use the
training to secure the resistance to our government." Billy Roper, of
White Revolution, says skinheads join the military for the usual
reasons, such as access to higher education, but also "to secure the
future for white children." "America began in bloody revolution," he
reminds me, "and it might end that way."

When it comes to screening out racists at recruitment centers,
military regulations appear to have collapsed. "We don't exclude
people from the army based on their thoughts," says S. Douglas Smith,
an Army public affairs officer. "We exclude based on behavior." He
says an "offensive" or "extremist" tattoo "might be a reason for them
not to be in the military." Or it might not. "We try to educate
recruiters on extremist tattoos," he says, but "the tattoo is a
relatively subjective decision" and shouldn't in itself bar enlistment.

What about something as obvious as a swastika? "A swastika would
trigger questions," Smith says. "But again, if the gentlemen said, 'I
like the way the swastika looked,' and had clean criminal record,
it's possible we would allow that person in." "There are First
Amendment rights," he adds.

In the spring, I telephoned at random five Army recruitment centers
across the country. I said I was interested in joining up and
mentioned that I had a pair of "SS bolts" tattooed on my arm. A 2000
military brochure stated that SS bolts were a tattoo image that
should raise suspicions. But none of the recruiters reacted
negatively, and when pressed directly about the tattoo, not one said
it would be an outright problem. A recruiter in Houston was typical;
he said he'd never heard of SS bolts and just encouraged me to come on in.

It's in the interest of recruiters to interpret recruiting standards
loosely. If they fail to meet targets, based on the number of
soldiers they enlist, they may have to attend a punitive counseling
session, and it could hurt any chance for promotion. When, in 2005,
the Army relaxed regulations on non-extremist tattoos, such as body
art covering the hands, neck and face, this cut recruiters even more slack.

Even the education of recruiters about how to identify extremists
seems to have fallen by the wayside. The 2005 Department of Defense
report concluded that recruiting personnel "were not aware of having
received systematic training on recognizing and responding to
possible terrorists" ­ a designation that includes white supremacists
­ "who try to enlist." Participation on white supremacist Web sites
would be an easy way to screen out extremist recruits, but the report
found that the military had not clarified which Web forums were
gathering places for extremists.

Once white supremacists are in the military, it is easy to stay
there. An Army Command Policy manual devotes more than 100 pages to
rooting them out. But no officer appears to be reading it.

Hunter Glass was a paratrooper in the 1980s and became a gang cop in
1999 in Fayetteville, North Carolina, near Fort Bragg. "In the early
1990s, the military was hard on them. They could pick and choose," he
recalls. "They were looking for swastikas. They were looking for
anything." But the regulations on racist extremists got jettisoned
with the war on terror.

Glass says white supremacists now enjoy an open culture of impunity
in the armed forces. "We're seeing guys with tattoos all the time,"
he says. "As far as hunting them down, I don't see it. I'm seeing the
opposite, where if a white supremacist has committed a crime, the
military stance will be, 'He didn't commit a race-related crime.'"

In fact, a 2006 report by the Army's Criminal Investigation Command
shows that military brass consistently ignored evidence of extremism.
One case, at Fort Hood, reveals that a soldier was making Internet
postings on the white supremacist site Stormfront.org. But the
investigator was unable to locate the soldier in question. In a brief
summary of the case, an investigator writes that due to "poor
documentation," "attempts to locate with minimal information met with
negative results." "I'm not doing my job here," the investigator
notes. "Needs to get fixed."

In another case, investigators found that a Fort Hood soldier
belonged to the neo-Nazi group Hammerskins and was "closely
associated with" the Celtic Knights of Austin, Texas, another
extremist organization, a situation bad enough to merit a joint
investigation by the FBI and the Army's Criminal Investigation
Command. The Army summary states that there was "probable cause" to
believe the soldier had participated in at least one white extremist
meeting and had "provided a military technical manual … to the leader
of a white extremist group in order to assist in the planning and
execution of future attacks on various targets."

Our of four preliminary probes into white supremacists, the Criminal
Investigation Command carried through on only this one. The probe
revealed that "a larger single attack was planned for the San
Antonio, TX after a considerable amount of media attention was given
to illegal immigrants. The attack was not completed due to the
inability of the organization to obtain explosives." Despite these
threats, the subject was interviewed only once, in 2006, and the
investigation was terminated the following year.

White supremacists may be doing more than avoiding expulsion. They
may be using their military status to help build the white right. The
FBI found that two Army privates in the 82nd Airborne Division at
Fort Bragg had attempted in 2007 to sell stolen property from the
military ­ including ballistic vests, a combat helmet and pain
medications such as morphine ­ to an undercover FBI agent they
believed was involved with the white supremacist movement. (They were
convicted and sentenced to six years.) It found multiple examples of
white supremacist recruitment among active military, including a
period in 2003 when six active duty soldiers at Fort Riley, members
of the Aryan Nation, were recruiting their Army colleagues and even
serving as the Aryan Nation's point of contact for the state of Kansas.

One white supremacist soldier, James Douglas Ross, a military
intelligence officer stationed at Fort Bragg, was given a bad conduct
discharge from the Army when he was caught trying to mail a
submachine gun from Iraq to his father's home in Spokane, Wash.
Military police found a cache of white supremacist paraphernalia and
several weapons hidden behind ceiling tiles in Ross' military
quarters. After his discharge, a Spokane County deputy sheriff saw
Ross passing out fliers for the neo-Nazi National Alliance.

Rooting out extremists is difficult because racism pervades the
military, according to soldiers. They say troops throughout the
Middle East use derogatory terms like "hajji" or "sand nigger" to
define Arab insurgents and often the Arab population itself.

"Racism was rampant," recalls vet Michael Prysner, who served in Iraq
in 2003 and 2004 as part of the 173rd Airborne Brigade. "All of
command, everywhere, it was completely ingrained in the consciousness
of every soldier. I've heard top generals refer to the Iraq people as
'hajjis.' The anti-Arab racism came from the brass. It came from the
top. And everything was justified because they weren't considered people."

Another vet, Michael Totten, who served in Iraq with the 101st
Airborne in 2003 and 2004, says, "It wouldn't stand out if you said
'sand niggers,' even if you aren't a neo-Nazi." Totten says his
perspective has changed in the intervening years, but "at the time, I
used the words 'sand nigger.' I didn't consider 'hajji' to be derogatory."

Geoffrey Millard, an organizer for Iraq Veterans Against the War,
served in Iraq for 13 months, beginning in 2004, as part of the 42nd
Infantry Division. He recalls Gen. George Casey, who served as the
commander in Iraq from 2004 to 2007, addressing a briefing he
attended in the summer of 2005 at Forward Operating Base, outside
Tikrit. "As he walked past, he was talking about some incident that
had just happened, and he was talking about how 'these stupid fucking
hajjis couldn't figure shit out.' And I'm just like, Are you kidding
me? This is Gen. Casey, the highest-ranking guy in Iraq, referring to
the Iraqi people as 'fucking hajjis.'" (A spokesperson for Casey, now
the Army Chief of Staff, said the general "did not make this statement.")

"The military is attractive to white supremacists," Millard says,
"because the war itself is racist."

The U.S. Senate Committee on the Armed Forces has long been
considered one of Congress' most powerful groups. It governs
legislation affecting the Pentagon, defense budget, military
strategies and operations. Today it is led by the influential Sens.
Carl Levin and John McCain. An investigation by the committee into
how white supremacists permeate the military in plain violation of
U.S. law could result in substantive changes. I contacted the
committee but staffers would not agree to be interviewed. Instead, a
spokesperson responded that white supremacy in the military has never
arisen as a concern. In an e-mail, the spokesperson said, "The
Committee doesn't have any information that would indicate this is a
particular problem."
--

About the writer

Matt Kennard graduated from the Colombia University Graduate School
of Journalism in 2008 as a Stabile Investigative scholar.

.