Saturday, February 28, 2009

Recruiting for the Military in Schools and the NCLB Policy

Recruiting for the Military in Schools and the NCLB Policy

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/02/27-10

by Sean Carroll
Published on Friday, February 27, 2009 by 13WHAM.com (Rochester, New York)

ROCHESTER, N.Y. - A debate over who, and how, military recruiters can
contact Rochester City School District students is heating up.

It comes after Superintendent Jean-Claude Brizard and the district's
legal counsel recognized that the school board's current policy was
in violation of the No Child Left Behind law.

In 2005, the board enacted a policy that allows parents to choose
whether the district can pass along contact information for their
child to military recruiters. An "Opt In" sort of a policy.

But, the district now feels that policy violates the law and should
reflect the policy of every other school district in Monroe County.
That policy would mean that parents must specifically notify the
district to prevent their contact information from being passed along
to military recruiters.

At stake is tens of millions of dollars in Title I federal funding.
Brizard said this was brought to the district's attention by some
military recruiters who wondered why they were receiving
significantly fewer names of potential recruits from the district.

"We have a dilemma; federal legislation and the board policy
contradict each other," Brizard explained. "NCLB requires that
children and families opt out of the system where the board policy
requires them to opt in to the system."

Many Speakers at School Board Meeting
Thursday night, at a meeting of the RCSD Board, speaker after
speaker--students, parents, and members of the community--all
expressed their overwhelming opposition to an apparent change in the
district's policy regarding military recruiters.

Crescenzo Scipione, a senior at the School of the Arts, addressed the
school board Thursday night.

"I think what the superintendent and this board may be forgetting is
that your first and foremost responsibility is not to a Marine
recruiter, it is to the students of this city," Scipione said.

Another speaker, Mary Adams, an RCSD parent, said, "Military
recruiters themselves are under tremendous pressure to increase their
numbers and they themselves are pressed to use psychological
manipulation, deceitful promises and non-stop pursuit of potential recruits."

Phil Davis, another parent of students in the district, said that he
wonders how the military can dictate education policies.

"I much prefer the Army not calling them, and I would prefer that
they keep the policy the same way and that they not encourage my son
to become violent," he said.

Still, some parents don't share this point of view.

Patricia Schmidt said she has four children who've chosen a career in
the military and she thinks more students need to at least consider that path.

"There are people that have good experiences and bad experiences with
the military but it doesn't mean that they shouldn't have that choice
to make," Schmidt said. "18-year-olds vote, and I'm sure their
parents don't go into the voting booths with them."

The district sent a letter to parents last month that reflected the
proposed change in policy. It explained how parents and legal
guardians "are permitted to deny disclosure of this (contact)
information" to colleges, employers, the military, or other organizations.

Late Thursday night, the board and superintendent agreed to look at
the issue closer over the coming months and attempt to bring the
district's policy into compliance with NCLB law.

A district spokesman said the superintendent maintains that must
happen, while the district and community can commit to lobbying
federal lawmakers for a change to the current law.

See video coverage here.
http://www.13wham.com/mediacenter/local.aspx?videoid=204828@video.wokr13.com&navCatId=5

.

Anti-war groups protest RCSD's decision to give student information to military

Anti-war groups protest RCSD's decision to give student information to military

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29425508/

WHEC-TV
Feb. 27, 2009

Rochester anti-war groups protested Thursday night at the Rochester
City School Board meeting over the reversal of the districts current
opt-out policy when it comes to giving private student-information to
military recruiters.

Students and parents used to be able to decide if they wanted
personal information given to military recruiters, but the district
is reversing the policy because it may not be in compliance with the
No Child Left Behind Act, and if they don't, they could risk federal funding.

"To give this private information to allow recruiters to contact
students at ages of 17 and 18 to take advantage of them maybe when
they've received a rejection letters from college and to use
predatory tactics like that is not something I'd like to see promoted
here in Rochester," Iraq and Afghanistan Veteran Bryan Casler said.

People in support of the policy change say it gives an option to some
kids who might otherwise not have one, and military recruiters are
not trying to take advantage of anyone.

.

Friday, February 27, 2009

Immigrants become citizens in six months - if they enlist

Immigrants become citizens in six months - if they enlist

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/02/23/ED93161R6B.DTL

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

The American military has launched a pilot program to recruit
skilled, so-called temporary immigrants who have been in the country
at least two years. Recruiters anticipate that the new recruits will
have more education and language skills than most Americans who
enlist. In return for their service, the military will speed up the
process for them to receive U.S. citizenship - some recruits will be
able to become U.S. citizens in as little as six months.

There are two sides to this coin of news: one good, and one
depressing. The good news is that it may help both the Army and
temporary immigrants. The policy could help the Army get access to
desperately needed specialists, and it could also help temporary
immigrants circumvent our nation's broken immigration system. The
sight of temporary immigrants pitching in to help this country could
also help soothe some of the many bruises that this country is
sporting from the devastating immigration battles of the past several years.

That last part is important, for many have already greeted this news
with angry shouts and loud jeers. We have little doubt that the
temporary immigrants who are hired to fill shortages in medical care,
field intelligence and language translation will execute their jobs
with honor, and that they will make this country proud to accept them
as citizens, but some people will clearly need to see living proof.
Army officials told us that they don't have any anecdotes from
soldiers or officers regarding the pilot program, but there are
responses aplenty on military Internet Web sites, and they can be
savage. Some claim that the new policy may lead to new influxes of
immigrants. Others question whether or not these new immigrants can
be loyal to the United States.

Of course the policy won't lead to an influx of new immigrants;
people tend to migrate based on economic decisions, not because
they're eager to join someone else's military. As for the loyalty
charge, the Army would do well to remember the example set by both
African Americans and Japanese Americans earlier last century. Both
of these groups had their loyalty to the United States questioned
when they participated in the armed services. Both groups used the
charge as inspiration to form some of the most highly decorated
military units this country has produced.

Also, we would certainly trust new immigrants to protect our country
before we trusted the other group that recruiters have turned to in
an effort to fill the ranks: convicted felons.

Now to the flip side of the coin. The reason why the news of this
program is depressing is because it proves how badly America has been
educating its own citizens. How sad is it that so few Americans speak
Arabic? How pitiful are we as a nation to not have enough medical
technicians and intelligence operatives to protect us? These are
skills that enough Americans could have learned if they had an
accessible and functioning educational system in which to learn them.
Instead, we have to look outward, searching for people who may have
learned what is necessary to keep us safe. It may be a boon for these
new immigrants, but it's an indictment of Americans.

.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

War is not a career opportunity

War is not a career opportunity

http://socialistworker.org/2009/02/18/war-not-a-career-opportunity

By Elizabeth Clinton and Matt Constanti
February 18, 2009

AMHERST, Mass.--Ten students and community members staged a die-in at
the University of Massachusetts (UMass) career fair in front of the
U.S. Army and Border Patrol recruitment tables on February 10.

Activists organized the die-in quickly--in only 30 minutes--after the
Marines sent out an e-mail to every UMass student inviting people to
join them at the fair. The only other organization with this
privilege is the UMass administration.

Participants in the die-in lay on the floor and did not budge, even
when military recruiters insulted them and career fair personnel told
them that they had called the police. Other students seemed
supportive of the action, with some asking how they could get involved.

One member of career fair personnel seemed terrified about the event,
saying, "If they can do this today, they can do this next year, they
can do this tomorrow!"

Other recruiters at the career fair included Raytheon, the ROTC,
NAVSEA Warfare Centers and General Dynamics. At a time when
working-class students are finding diminishing options for jobs, it's
crucial for antiwar activists to challenge the military's
exploitation of their fears.

We will continue to protest and organize today, tomorrow and next
year, if necessary. Killing people and risking being killed for U.S.
imperialism is not a career opportunity.

.

U.S. Military Will Offer Path to Citizenship

U.S. Military Will Offer Path to Citizenship

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/15/us/15immig.html

By JULIA PRESTON
Published: February 14, 2009

Stretched thin in Afghanistan and Iraq, the American military will
begin recruiting skilled immigrants who are living in this country
with temporary visas, offering them the chance to become United
States citizens in as little as six months.

Immigrants who are permanent residents, with documents commonly known
as green cards, have long been eligible to enlist. But the new
effort, for the first time since the Vietnam War, will open the armed
forces to temporary immigrants if they have lived in the United
States for a minimum of two years, according to military officials
familiar with the plan.

Recruiters expect that the temporary immigrants will have more
education, foreign language skills and professional expertise than
many Americans who enlist, helping the military to fill shortages in
medical care, language interpretation and field intelligence analysis.

"The American Army finds itself in a lot of different countries where
cultural awareness is critical," said Lt. Gen. Benjamin C. Freakley,
the top recruitment officer for the Army, which is leading the pilot
program. "There will be some very talented folks in this group."

The program will begin small ­ limited to 1,000 enlistees nationwide
in its first year, most for the Army and some for other branches. If
the pilot program succeeds as Pentagon officials anticipate, it will
expand for all branches of the military. For the Army, it could
eventually provide as many as 14,000 volunteers a year, or about one
in six recruits.

About 8,000 permanent immigrants with green cards join the armed
forces annually, the Pentagon reports, and about 29,000 foreign-born
people currently serving are not American citizens.

Although the Pentagon has had wartime authority to recruit immigrants
since shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks, military officials have
moved cautiously to lay the legal groundwork for the temporary
immigrant program to avoid controversy within the ranks and among
veterans over the prospect of large numbers of immigrants in the armed forces.

A preliminary Pentagon announcement of the program last year drew a
stream of angry comments from officers and veterans on Military.com,
a Web site they frequent.

Marty Justis, executive director of the national headquarters of the
American Legion, the veterans' organization, said that while the
group opposes "any great influx of immigrants" to the United States,
it would not object to recruiting temporary immigrants as long as
they passed tough background checks. But he said the immigrants'
allegiance to the United States "must take precedence over and above
any ties they may have with their native country."

The military does not allow illegal immigrants to enlist, and that
policy would not change, officers said. Recruiting officials pointed
out that volunteers with temporary visas would have already passed a
security screening and would have shown that they had no criminal record.

"The Army will gain in its strength in human capital," General
Freakley said, "and the immigrants will gain their citizenship and
get on a ramp to the American dream."

In recent years, as American forces faced combat in two wars and
recruiters struggled to meet their goals for the all-volunteer
military, thousands of legal immigrants with temporary visas who
tried to enlist were turned away because they lacked permanent green
cards, recruiting officers said.

Recruiters' work became easier in the last few months as unemployment
soared and more Americans sought to join the military. But the
Pentagon, facing a new deployment of 30,000 troops to Afghanistan,
still has difficulties in attracting doctors, specialized nurses and
language experts.

Several types of temporary work visas require college or advanced
degrees or professional expertise, and immigrants who are working as
doctors and nurses in the United States have already been certified
by American medical boards.

Military figures show that only 82 percent of about 80,000 Army
recruits last year had high school diplomas. According to new
figures, the Army provided waivers to 18 percent of active-duty
recruits in the final four months of last year, allowing them to
enlist despite medical conditions or criminal records.

Military officials want to attract immigrants who have native
knowledge of languages and cultures that the Pentagon considers
strategically vital. The program will also be open to students and refugees.

The Army's one-year pilot program will begin in New York City to
recruit about 550 temporary immigrants who speak one or more of 35
languages, including Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Igbo (a tongue spoken in
Nigeria), Kurdish, Nepalese, Pashto, Russian and Tamil. Spanish
speakers are not eligible. The Army's program will also include about
300 medical professionals to be recruited nationwide. Recruiting will
start after Department of Homeland Security officials update an
immigration rule in coming days.

Pentagon officials expect that the lure of accelerated citizenship
will be powerful. Under a statute invoked in 2002 by the Bush
administration, immigrants who serve in the military can apply to
become citizens on the first day of active service, and they can take
the oath in as little as six months.

For foreigners who come to work or study in the United States on
temporary visas, the path to citizenship is uncertain and at best
agonizingly long, often lasting more than a decade. The military also
waives naturalization fees, which are at least $675.

To enlist, temporary immigrants will have to prove that they have
lived in the United States for two years and have not been out of the
country for longer than 90 days during that time. They will have to
pass an English test.

Language experts will have to serve four years of active duty, and
health care professionals will serve three years of active duty or
six years in the Reserves. If the immigrants do not complete their
service honorably, they could lose their citizenship.

Commenters who vented their suspicions of the program on Military.com
said it could be used by terrorists to penetrate the armed forces.

At a street corner recruiting station in Bay Ridge in Brooklyn, Staff
Sgt. Alejandro Campos of the Army said he had already fielded calls
from temporary immigrants who heard rumors about the program.

"We're going to give people the opportunity to be part of the United
States who are dying to be part of this country and they weren't able
to before now," said Sergeant Campos, who was born in the Dominican
Republic and became a United States citizen after he joined the Army.

Sergeant Campos said he saw how useful it was to have soldiers who
were native Arabic speakers during two tours in Iraq.

"The first time around we didn't have soldier translators," he said.
"But now that we have soldiers as translators, we are able to trust
more, we are able to accomplish the mission with more accuracy."

.

Weapons Training In San Diego Schools Ends

STUDENTS BEAT MILITARY:
WEAPONS TRAINING IN SAN DIEGO SCHOOLS ENDS

http://prorev.com/2009/02/students-beat-military-weapons-training.html

February 14, 2009

Education Not Arms - San Diego Unified, located in the middle of one
of the largest military complexes in the world, took the
uncharacteristic step of banning rifle training conducted under the
military's high school JROTC program. Eleven schools with rifle
ranges were affected in the nation's eighth largest urban district. . .

It wasn't until four hours into the board meeting, at 9:00 PM, that
the agenda item came up for discussion. The vote was preceded by
testimony from about 15 pro- and con- speakers in front of a crowd
that was largely in favor of terminating the weapons training
program. One school board member said that in all of his many years
on the board, this was the most impressive student effort he had ever
seen. Even two board members who opposed the resolution expressed
their admiration for the students' involvement. When the decision was
made, the resolution, which immediately banned all marksmanship
training in the district, passed by a vote of 3-2. The crowd then
spilled out of the auditorium to hold a loud and joyous celebration.

One of their main concerns was the way schools were tracking students
into military training (via JROTC) while denying them adequate class
alternatives, especially ones needed to qualify for college. Students
from African American and Latino families were being
disproportionately affected.

To address the problem, the coalition adopted three initial
goals--convince the school district to:

-stop placing students into military science (JROTC) classes without
their informed consent.

-stop telling parents and students that the class will help them
qualify for college, when it won't.

-ban weapons training and JROTC gun ranges in San Diego schools.

All three goals have now been achieved, the first two by a
superintendent' s directive, the third by school board action.
Throughout the over one-year long campaign, high school students have
played a central role in educating and mobilizing their peers, with
support from a variety of community and college groups.

.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Army recruiters describe nightmare of job

Army recruiters describe nightmare of job

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/hotstories/6261403.html

By LINDSAY WISE Copyright 2009 Houston Chronicle
Feb. 12, 2009

Staff Sgt. Daren Stewart remembers driving down a rural road in
Arkansas and thinking how easy it would be to jerk the wheel and flip
his car into a ditch.

The 27-year-old Iraq war veteran says he wasn't suicidal. He just
figured that injuring himself was the only way he could get any time
off from his job as an Army recruiter.

"I would rather spend three years straight in Iraq, without coming
home, without a break, than ever be a recruiter again," said Stewart,
who recruited in Hot Springs, Ark., from 2005 to 2008.

Five-hundred miles away in Houston, the suicides of four Army
recruiters from a single battalion have focused lawmakers and
veterans advocates on the enormous stress endured by soldiers tasked
with refilling the ranks of the all-volunteer military during wartime.

In response to the deaths, the Army will suspend all recruiting
nationwide Friday to focus on leadership training, suicide prevention
and the health of its 8,900 recruiters. The Army Inspector General
also is examining working conditions throughout U.S. Army Recruiting Command.

In interviews with the Houston Chronicle, current and former
recruiters and their relatives from 10 of the Army's 38 recruiting
battalions detailed their own experiences in a job long considered
one of the military's toughest. They said the exhausting hours,
degrading treatment and toxic command climate reported in Houston
were not isolated incidents, but deep-rooted, widespread problems
that have affected recruiters across the country for years.

Lt. Gen. Benjamin C. Freakley of U.S. Army Accessions Command said
soldiers have a right to complain, but in visits to recruiting
stations, he has encountered a very positive, sensitive command climate.

"I'm not going to ask for anecdotal information because I've been in
the Army 33 years and if I walk into a unit and ask what is wrong, I
get an earful, but when I ask what is good, I get balance," said
Freakley, whose command oversees USAREC.

At the strip mall in Hot Springs where Daren Stewart worked, however,
most of the recruiters were on antidepressants or antianxiety medication.

They worked 12- to 14-hour shifts, six or seven days a week, Stewart
said. Commanders cursed, humiliated and screamed at soldiers who fell
short of monthly quotas, threatening to ruin their careers or
withhold time off with loved ones, he said.

Stewart turned to alcohol to cope with stress so severe it destroyed
his marriage and made his hair fall out.

Sgt. 1st Class Henry Patrick said fellow recruiters in the Hot
Springs station were told to shift conversations with potential
recruits away from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. That didn't sit
right with him.

"I'd tell them they had a 50-50 chance," said Patrick, 43. "For the
few people I did put in, they liked the fact that I was honest with them."

Life-or-death situation

Staff Sgt. Wade Bozeman, another Hot Springs recruiter, said he also
hated the tacit expectation that he should compromise his ethics to
meet recruiting goals, whether it meant falsifying records or lying
to recruits.

Deeply depressed, the 37-year-old gained 50 pounds and started
suffering from insomnia, blackouts and panic attacks. His wife, Jill
Bozeman, asked his commanders for help, to no avail.

One morning in May 2008, Bozeman showed up at his home disoriented,
fearful and angry. When he left, his wife panicked.

"I knew he'd lost it," she said. "I picked up the phone, and I was
shaking because I'm seeing him shoot a bunch of people or run his car
into oncoming traffic or something."

She called his station commander and told him he had two hours to
help or she was going to call battalion headquarters and the local media.

Bozeman credits his wife for saving his life. Later that morning, he
drove to Little Rock Air Force Base to be evaluated by a psychiatrist
and checked himself into a mental hospital for four days. His
therapist said he would likely suffer Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
once he left recruiting.

The irony is that he was a good recruiter, Bozeman said. He won
awards and was even asked to consider a future as a station commander.

"Eventually the system takes down whoever's in it," he said. "You
either become part of it, or you go mad. I guess I did both."

In Watertown, N.Y., Army recruiter Derrick Meadows' rage and
frustration nearly shattered his family, said his wife, Alison Meadows.

When the Afghanistan veteran struggled to meet quota, his commanders
threatened to kick him out of the Army, she said.

"They'd tell him he sucks, tell him he's not worth anything, tell him
he doesn't deserve to be a soldier," she said.

The staff sergeant who had served in the military for 18 of his 37
years felt like a failure, she said. At home, his insecurity
translated into anger.

"He just changed into a completely different person," Alison said.
"He was all the time mad. He was very frustrated. He would cry."

In November, Derrick left recruiting and returned to a regular Army
unit in Texas. His wife says she's relieved, but still bitter.

"That's all that matters, numbers and getting people in the Army,"
she said. "Individual soldiers don't matter. Families don't matter."

A hope for change

Steve Round, 38, was a top recruiter in Texas before becoming a
recruiter trainer for the Salt Lake City battalion in the 1990s. His
work took him to recruiting stations in seven states.

He remembers a recruiter who almost jumped off a bridge in Twin
Falls, Idaho, and another who showed up at the station buck naked and
ended up in a mental hospital. Another attempted suicide in Roy, Utah, he said.

"It's the way it's been from 1980 to the present day," Round said.
"If you don't put in your two people come hell or high water, you go
from hero to zero very fast."

Sgt. 1st Class Kenneth Collins is optimistic USAREC can change. He
recruited in Houston from 2006 to 2008 before becoming a station
commander in Kokomo, Ind., where conditions are better. In the
aftermath of the suicides in Houston, he said, USAREC announced
shorter work hours for all recruiters.
--

lindsay.wise@chron.com

.

Friday, February 13, 2009

Military seeing more applicants

[4 articles]

Military Services Meet or Exceed January Recruiting Needs

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=53028

By Gerry J. Gilmore
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Feb. 10, 2009 – All active duty U.S. military services
and reserve components met or exceeded their January recruiting
needs, Defense Department officials reported today.

The Army signed up 9,658 new active-duty soldiers, 107 percent of its
target number of 9,000 enlistees.

The Navy signed up 2,948 new active-duty sailors, 100 percent of its
target number.

The Marine Corps signed up 3,720 new active-duty Marines, 109 percent
of its target number of 3,406 enlistees.

The Air Force signed up 2,600 new active-duty airmen, 100 percent of
its target number.

The active Army, Marines, Air Force and Navy also met or exceeded
their retention goals for January, officials said.

Guard and reserve forces met or exceeded their January recruiting needs.

The Army Reserve signed up 3,223 new soldiers for 103 percent of its
target number of 3,128 enlistees.

The Navy Reserve signed up 712 new sailors, meeting 100 percent of its goal.

The Marine Corps Reserve signed up 879 new Marines, for 155 percent
of its target number of 567 enlistees.

The Air National Guard signed up 896 new airmen, for 127 percent of
its target number of 703 enlistees.

The Air Force Reserve signed up 683 new airmen, meeting 100 percent
of its goal.

The Army National Guard signed up 4,913 new soldiers in January.
Although that number is listed as 88 percent of the monthly goal,
there's more to the story, a National Guard Bureau official said.

"It's not just about the monthly recruiting goal," Randy Noller, a
Guard Bureau spokesman, said. "Right now, we are over our end
strength and can slow down on recruiting."

The Army National Guard now has 366,009 soldiers in its ranks, which
exceeds its authorized end strength of 358,200 troops, Noller said.

Since the Army National Guard is recruiting fewer new soldiers each
month, it can "increase the quality of people coming in," Noller said.

Attrition losses in all reserve components are within acceptable
limits, officials said.

--------

Army Recruiting Remains on Track Despite Challenges

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=53075

By J.D. Leipold
Special to American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Feb. 12, 2009 – Despite challenges in recruiting 17- to
24-year-olds, Army leaders said yesterday the service is on track to
meet recruiting goals this year, and will not lower standards to do so.

The Army faces major challenges in recruiting from the under-24
demographic group, due to education, health and conduct deficiencies,
said Lt. Gen. Benjamin C. Freakley, commanding general of U.S. Army
Accessions Command.

Those challenges, he told reporters at a Pentagon media roundtable
discussion, disqualify seven of 10 military applicants.

"We think education is a strategic issue for the country," Freakley
said. "Nationally, we have a 70 percent high school graduation rate.
We have not lowered our standards, but the goals from the Office of
the Secretary of Defense are that 90 percent of those who come in the
all-volunteer force have graduated from high school."

Last year, 83 percent of Army recruits were high school graduates.

"Our second challenge is with health," Freakley said. "Of 32 million
17- to 24-year-olds, 3.2 million of them are childhood obese --
that's 10 percent. Several years ago, one in 20 Americans was obese,
but that's closing in soon on one in four."

Freakley said many of those 3.2 million have childhood diabetes or
muscular skeletal issues and that the youth of today have 8 percent
less bone mass, which translates to stress fractures from running and
more youth using prescription drugs.

The third issue the Army is facing is bad conduct. Young people
disqualify themselves from entering the military because of events
that happened in middle or high school.

"We're trying to change the landscape as we look and work in this
environment," the general said. "Educationally, we have a program,
'March to Success' which helps young people get online and do better
with standardized tests.

"We have a 'Planning for Life' program where we go into schools and
talk about strong bodies, strong minds, strong souls and try to keep
them focused on completing high school," Freakley added. "Our
recruiters are getting into schools, serving as role models and
counselors, setting standards and examples, so we're working on this
in every way we can."

To put the matter in context, Freakley cited two famous war heroes.
"Audie Murphy, World War II Medal of Honor awardee, and Alvin York,
World War I Medal of Honor awardee, would not be eligible to come
into today's Army," he said.

Maj. Gen. Thomas P. Bostick, commander of U.S. Army Recruiting
Command, said the Army took in 170,000 men and women last year, which
is about the size of the population of Newport News, Va.

So far in fiscal 2009, which began in October, the regular Army is at
about 105 percent of goal, and the Army Reserve is at 112 percent of
its goal, Bostick said.

"It's the best start we've had in about six years," he said. "I'm
fully confident we'll accomplish the 78,000 mission for the regular
Army and 26,500 mission for the Army Reserves."

Bostick said recruiting has gone especially well in the medical and
Special Forces areas, adding that in 2008 a medical recruiting
brigade consisting of five medical battalions scattered throughout
the country was stood up. He also said the Army has achieved 100
percent success with Special Forces recruiting and created a special
missions brigade. Recruitment of chaplains and warrant officers also
has been high.

While the poor economy has created hardships on soldiers as it has
every American, Bostick said, historically, as unemployment rises,
the Army tends to see improvement in some areas of recruiting. Yet,
"less than three out of 10 young men and women are qualified to
serve, so we still must deal with that, whether it's education,
obesity or misconduct as they were growing up."

Even so, he said, the quality of the U.S. soldier has never been better.

"Everyone who serves in the Army is fully qualified to serve. One
hundred percent of our soldiers have high school diplomas or GEDs,"
Bostick said. "The aptitude of our soldiers is higher than the
average American walking the streets throughout the cities and towns
across America, and eight of 10 soldiers require no waivers."

The general added that the Army has what he considers a very sound
process that looks at young Americans and makes the determination
that if they made a mistake in their lives and recovered from it,
they deserve an opportunity to serve.

For potential recruits who've made more serious mistakes, Bostick
said, the applicants go through a 10-level decision process ending
with him or another general officer who makes the final determination
on suitability, whether the waiver is for medical or character reasons.

Maj. Gen. Arthur M. Bartell, who is charged with recruiting officers
as commander of U.S. Army Cadet Command, said the Army was on track
to meet its mission of commissioning 4,500 officers for fiscal 2009.
For fiscal 2010, that number will increase to 5,100, and in fiscal
2011, officer growth will top out at 5,350.

"More than 60 percent of our lieutenants come through the ROTC
program," he said. "In a word, what makes the ROTC experience special
is diversity – that's geographic, educational, gender and ethnic
diversity. Diversity exposes young Americans to a community of ideas
that we find in our traditional college campus environment."

Characteristics of athleticism, high mental aptitude and leadership
are characteristics the Army wants its future officers to possess, he
said, adding that ROTC is present at 273 colleges and universities
and represented in all 50 states and Puerto Rico.

Bartell said the Army hasn't had to change its standards of quality
for new officers, nor does he see that changing in the future,
despite recruiting challenges.

--------

Military seeing more applicants

http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/article/20090207/NEWS01/902070332/1001/NEWS

Less violence in Iraq, economy triggering appeal

Ryan Loew • rloew@lsj.com • February 7, 2009 •
From Lansing State Journal

Steve Irwin's career options would be pretty slim if he wasn't about
to ship out Tuesday to boot camp.

The 22-year-old's most recent job was in Grand Rapids, where he
worked as a restaurant server.

Irwin earned the minimum wage, until a consistent cut in hours
prompted him to quit and move back to Lansing.

With serious doubts about his ability to find another entry-level
job, let alone afford tuition at a community college, Irwin enlisted
in the Army two weeks ago.

"It's probably the only guaranteed job I know of, joining the Army,"
Irwin said.

As the economy continues to bleed civilian jobs, recruiters say
interest in the military is up. Recruiters are seeing more
applicants, and they're seeing more who have at least high school
diplomas and higher education
[]
levels.

"We have an influx of personnel coming in all the time, and it's
ranging from people with master's degrees, bachelor's degrees and
high school seniors," said Army Sgt. 1st Class Billy Montgomery, who
works as a recruiter in Lansing.

The Defense Department can't say what percentage of the increased
traffic at recruitment centers is due to job losses.

People might be responding to enlistment bonuses that can reach
$40,000, a better GI Bill to pay for college and up to $65,000 to pay
off existing student loans.

Adding to the appeal of joining now is the reduction in violence in
Iraq and the possibility of U.S. forces withdrawing in a year or two.

All branches

All branches of the service met or exceeded recruitment goals in
fiscal 2008, the first year they have done so since 2002, the Defense
Department said.

The trend continued through October, November and December, the first
quarter of fiscal 2009, and is expected to hold when January figures
are tallied.

"It goes right back to the economy," Montgomery said. "The economy
alone has caused a lot of individuals to rethink their future and
rethink what they have planned for themselves and their families. The
military can offer them something where they gain, get from point A
to point B, in possibly three to four years."

The Army Great Lakes Recruiting Battalion, which covers the Lower
Peninsula, met its recruitment goals in the first four months of the
2009 fiscal year. Army spokesman Jake Joy attributed that to a number
of factors, including the state of the economy.

"It does seem to be at least affecting the willingness of people to
consider the Army as a viable career," he said.

Meeting those goals signals what recruiters hope to be the beginning
of a more promising recruitment year. The battalion has not met its
yearly goals since before 2001.

Still, not all recruiters see the economy as the primary motivator
for potential recruits.

"Everybody joins the military for one reason or another, whether it's
service to the country or to get a little bit more money," said Sgt.
Frederick Joseph, a recruiter for the Michigan Army National Guard in Lansing.

'They are patriotic'

External factors such as the economy play a role in how potential
recruits make decisions, according to Marine Corps Staff Sgt. Donald Bohanner.

But, he said in an e-mail, "we have not seen any trends linking
particular economic factors to a young person's decision to enlist in
the Marine Corps."

Recruitment numbers at the Marine Corps' Recruiting Station Lansing
have consistently surpassed yearly goals - something he attributes to
hard-working recruiters and patriotic recruits, not the economy.

"They are patriotic; they want to give back to their community," said
Bohanner, "and that's what the Marine Corps is built on."

--------

Attractive job option

http://www.pal-item.com/article/20090207/NEWS01/902070301/1008

During tough economic times, military pay, benefits draw enlistees

BY BILL ENGLE • STAFF WRITER •
February 7, 2009

East-central Indiana's faltering economy, which is wreaking havoc on
business and industry, is a plus for military recruiting.

Recruiters say that laid-off employees have joined an already strong
number of young people coming to local recruiting offices inquiring
about careers in the military, many interested in educational and
other benefits.

"Yes, our numbers are up, and I suspect some of it is people who have
lost their jobs and don't have a lot of alternatives," said Sgt. Greg
Lynch, a U.S. Army recruiter in Richmond.

But there are other reasons, said U.S. Navy Senior Chief Cesar Diaz,
in charge of recruiting for the zone that includes eastern Indiana.

"One is certainly the benefits. The incentives are there," Diaz said.
"The young people are coming in for better opportunities, to learn a
skill or get an education. They are also looking at money for
college. We're doing well and the quality (of recruits) has improved."

Jessica Clark, 18, recently came to the Army Recruiting Center in
Richmond to talk to Lynch. Clark, a 2008 Lincoln High School
graduate, is looking at the Army as a way to complete her studies in nursing.

"It's a way to better myself and help pay for college," she said. "I
would also like to travel the world, but ultimately I'm interested in
the medical field."

The New York Times reported in January that recruiting for all active
service and reserve forces met or exceeded recruiting goals during
the first quarter of this fiscal year, the first time since 2004 when
violence in Iraq was intensifying.

Early numbers for 2009 suggest that enlistments will continue to grow.

Lynch said older men and women are inquiring about careers in the
Army, including workers laid off from companies such as Visteon in
Connersville and Astral Industries in Lynn.

He said, "The recession and unemployment does help with recruiting,"
but added "Indiana is a patriotic state."

"There are a lot of young people who are ready and willing to serve,"
he said. "And this area has been traditionally strong in recruitment.
Young people are willing to step up. It says a lot about the community."

Lynch would know. He is a Richmond native, a 1993 Richmond High
School graduate and a member of the RHS boys state basketball
championship team.

The son of Harlos and Peggy Lynch of rural Richmond, he is a 12-year
veteran of the Army who served infantry tours in Afghanistan and Iraq.

"I'm excited and very passionate about what I do here," said Lynch,
35. "It's an honor to be a part of the team here and an honor to be
working here in my hometown."

The Indiana Army National Guard, which recently returned more than
3,300 soldiers from Iraq, also has seen continued interest in enlistment.

"There are more people who just walk in off the street," said
Richmond recruiter Sgt. Todd O'Neal, who lives in Eaton, Ohio. "Some
are older. Some are ones laid off from jobs."

O'Neal said he transferred from Connersville, where he helped enlist
a 37-year-old woman with a bachelor's degree and another woman who was 40.

The Army in 2006 increased the age of enlistment from 35 to 42.

"You get people from everywhere," O'Neal said. "It has been up
recently. The Guard's big thing is paying for people's college."

Marine Corps recruiting also has increased, though Sgt. Jay Edwards,
public affairs director in Indianapolis, said the choice to serve is
individual and typically much more complex than one issue.

"What the Marine Corps offers young people does not change based on
any external factor," Edwards said. "Our image of a smart, tough,
elite warrior continues to resonate with the young people seeking to
join the Corps ... "

.

National Guard Fights Drop In Recruits

[2 articles]

Retired troop nets cash assisting recruiting

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/02/army_devall_GRAP_020809w/

Guard program has paid out $143M since its inception

By Michelle Tan - Staff writer
Posted : Monday Feb 9, 2009

Travis DeVall spent 17 of his 20 years in the Army and National Guard
as a recruiter, bringing more than 600 people into the service.

DeVall, 41, retired as a master sergeant in September 2006, but that
hasn't stopped him from recruiting.

In fact, he has recruited at least 112 more new soldiers since
retirement ­ and earned a cool $192,000, and possibly up to $32,000
more, in the process. His success has made him the top producer in
the Guard Recruiting Assistance Program.

"I'm kind of an RA on steroids," he said.

DeVall is one of more than 170,900 Guard soldiers and retirees who
participate in the program, also known as G-RAP, which hands out
payments for bringing in recruits. It was unveiled in December 2005,
and more than 84,200 new soldiers have been recruited into the Guard
through the program. It has become the source of almost half of the
Guard's monthly accessions.

So far this fiscal year, G-RAP has netted 10,553 new soldiers for the Guard.

Participants in the program earn up to $2,000 for every new soldier
they recruit into the Guard. An RA receives the first $1,000 when the
recruit enlists and the second $1,000 when the new soldier ships to
basic training.

Thirty-two of DeVall's recruits have yet to ship to basic.

So far, the Guard has paid its RAs $143 million for the more than
84,200 recruits they've brought into the service.

"I tell everybody everything has come back full circle," said DeVall,
who lives in Tampa, Fla., and sees his role as an RA as a full-time job.

DeVall, who in 2006 earned a base pay of more than $48,850 a year as
an E-8 with 20 years of service, said he spends anywhere from 15 to
40 hours a week talking to prospective soldiers.

When asked about the keys to his success, DeVall said he applies the
same recruiting principles he learned and practiced while in uniform.

A benefit to G-RAP is he doesn't have to handle the paperwork
involved in enlisting someone into the military, DeVall said. That
job is handled by the full-time, uniformed recruiters.

"With this program I can focus a lot on prospecting and stay
involved," he said. "I can cover a lot more ground and talk to
people, which really, in recruiting, the best part is talking to
people, sharing the Guard story and gathering interest and seeing
that spark in their eye."

In addition, DeVall spent the last five years of his Guard career as
a recruiter in the Tampa area, so he knows the community and is
familiar with the local schools.

"I'm a very personable guy," DeVall said. "I have no problem talking
to people, and I love talking to people about the Army National Guard."

His knowledge of his community has enabled him to enhance the
uniformed recruiters, said DeVall, whose oldest son is serving in Iraq.

"If I have somebody I talk to and that interest is generated, that's
when I introduce them to the recruiter, and throughout the process I
stay involved with that prospect," he said. "[At that point] the
recruiter is running it, but I stay involved just to keep that
motivation and that excitement. It's all about building those relationships."

There is no resentment from the full-time recruiters, DeVall said.

"With the G-RAP program, I'm nothing more than an enhancement, a
multiplier to their efforts," he said. "I can go into a school [and]
I like to take the recruiters into a school with me. I do have the
ability to generate a lot of interest and curiosity that walks [the
prospective soldiers] up to [the recruiters'] front door and they can
close them. I don't get in their business. The beauty of the program
is working together to accomplish the mission."

The only down side to being an RA is he recruits his competition,
DeVall said, because those new soldiers then have the ability to
become RAs themselves.

"There are 100 and some people within my community now who are
technically my competitors, which is interesting, but it's pretty
cool," he said.

Successful recruiting comes down to what the prospective soldier is
looking for, DeVall said.

"It goes back to the person you're talking to, making it about them.
What are their goals?" he said.

DeVall said he plans to continue recruiting as long as the G-RAP
program exists.

"When I retired I underestimated how much I would miss it," he said.
"This allows me to still be involved and also contribute to the
strength of the Guard."

--------

National Guard Fights Drop In Recruits

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=100468818

by Tom Bowman
February 9, 2009

The miserable economy has made work easier for at least one group:
Army recruiters. The Army has exceeded its recruiting goals since
last fall, after some very tough years, but the Army's success comes
at the expense of the Army National Guard, which is struggling to
make its target recruiting numbers.

Recruits are looking for full-time work ­ something the Guard isn't
always able to offer.

At the Illinois National Guard Armory in a working class neighborhood
of Chicago, Spc. Jayson Randle works the phones, calling potential
recruits and those who have shown interest in the Guard.

But these days, it's harder to get anyone to sign up. That's because
potential recruits are enlisting in the regular Army, rather than the Guard.

"Our mission goal was 196 [recruits] for the state," says Capt. Paul
Metzdorff a top recruiting officer for the National Guard in
Illinois. "We fell short. I think our final number was around 112."

It's the same story all across the country. Guard officials in
Washington say their overall recruiting numbers for the month of
January could miss their target by as much as 20 percent.

That kind of drop-off hasn't been seen since 2005, when recruits
stayed away because of Iraq. But the reason this time is that many
who lost their jobs are looking for a steady paycheck.

"Most people are looking for active, full-time work rather than
part-time work," Randle says.

Full-time work is what's offered in the active-duty Army, but Randle
only offers part-time work with the Guard.

Guard units still deploy to Iraq and Afghanistan. But for the most
part, Guard soldiers just get paid for one weekend a month and two
weeks each summer. That's perfect for a student, who can also pick up
some education benefits.

Quality Vs. Quantity

On the other side of this cinder-block office, crammed with metal
desks, posters and stacks of brochures is Sgt. 1st Class Reginald
Spearman. He's been a recruiter for six years, and now he's seeing a
different kind of recruit ­ those who once had a choice of careers.

"You have people with college degrees and master's degrees who can't
find a job," Spearman says. "I enlisted a guy two months ago who had
a master's in English and couldn't find a job, so he figured his last
resort was to go active."

Spearman says he was able to sign up that recruit because of a
special program called Active First. That means the recruit goes into
the active-duty Army first ­ for three years ­ then spends the
remaining five years in the National Guard.

Because the National Guard is trying to come up with a higher quality
recruit, it has had a hard time meeting its targets. The Guard has
stopped taking those with low scores on the military's aptitude test.

The regular Army, on the other hand, is looking for quantity, so its
quality numbers are suffering. The Army is bringing in more recruits
than the Guard with waivers for criminal misconduct and medical problems.

But the Army has been able to exceed its recruiting goals for the
past four months, and the Army is once again expected to have brought
in more recruits in January than it was aiming for.

Top Guard officials say they're not worried yet about their
recruiting troubles, but they do see another concern: Federal budget
cuts may force the cancellation of the Guard's $20,000 enlistment bonus.

Lt. Gen. Clyde Vaughn, director of the Army National Guard at the
Pentagon, says that money is needed to keep the Guard competitive
with the regular Army, which offers a $40,000 bonus.

"As long as the money's there to pay the bonus piece, I think that we
will overcome that," Vaughn says. "I think it's going to be tougher
rather than easier."

That bonus makes sense to Randle, the recruiter in Chicago.

"A lot of people ­ they're looking for the money," he says. "They're
looking for the 20 grand ­ that's a big part of it."

.

27,000 Work in Pentagon PR and Recruiting

27,000 Work in Pentagon PR and Recruiting

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2009/02/27000-work-in-p.html

By Noah Shachtman
February 05, 2009

Forget the drone stuff. Here is your eye-popping statistic of the
day: "This year, the Pentagon will employ 27,000 people just for
recruitment, advertising and public relations ­ almost as many as the
total 30,000-person work force in the State Department."

That's from an Associated Press investigation, "which found that over
the past five years, the money the military spends on winning hearts
and minds at home and abroad has grown by 63 percent, to at least
$4.7 billion this year."

Staff costs take up most of the money, more than $2 billion. Another
$1.6 billion goes into recruiting. About a half-billion goes towards
"psychological operations, which targets foreign audiences." And,
finally, "$547 million goes into public affairs, which reaches
American audiences."

That last one may be the most amazing figure of 'em all. Because
getting a straightforward answer out of most military public affairs
shops is still a root-canal-painful procedure. You'd think it'd be
easier, with all those resources brought to bear.

.

Poor scores, weight issues keep Hispanics out of service

Unfit for military service

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/6251192.html

Report: Poor scores, weight issues keep Hispanics out of service

By MOISES MENDOZA
Feb. 7, 2009

Cristal Nieto has dreamed about becoming a Marine since she got
involved in Pasadena High School's Junior ROTC program.

But when she approached recruiters a few years ago, she confronted a
problem: The 5-foot-tall Nieto had 50 pounds to lose to qualify for service.

"I really wasn't sure I could do it," the 18-year-old said after
working out this week. "My weight has been up and down. It's been
hard to lose."

Hispanics like Nieto are underrepresented in the military because a
disproportionate number are overweight or do poorly in school or
military aptitude tests, a recent report said. Because the military
has stringent weight and education requirements, many Hispanics can't
qualify for service, according to the report by the Rand Corporation,
a California think tank specializing in military analysis.

The report said about 75 percent of Hispanics overall are high school
graduates compared to 85 percent of whites, and Hispanics are on
average 10 pounds heavier than whites.

Hispanics, the fastest-growing ethnicity in the U.S., make up 15
percent of the nation's population, according to Census Bureau
estimates. But they accounted for 11 percent of Army enlistments in
2007. Lead author Beth Asch said other armed services fared better:
Hispanics made up 15 percent of Navy contracts with similar
percentages among the Marine Corps and Air Force. Overall Hispanics
make up about 10 percent of the 1.4 million active military
personnel, Department of Defense statistics show.

Mindful of diversity

The government has long advocated that the military's makeup reflect
the country's diversity. Concern about the military's demographics
dates to the Vietnam War when activists discovered that members of
minority groups were more likely to die in combat than whites.

In Iraq, between May 2003 and April 2008, about 75 percent of
casualties were whites. Hispanics accounted for just under 11 percent
of military deaths in Iraq, according to the Department of Defense.

Recruiters and policy experts say there is no easy answer to
recruiting more Hispanics.The January Rand report suggests more
rigorous weight reduction programs or easing weight requirements and
instead measuring recruits' strength, among other options.

"You can have a large bone structure but still be very strong and
effective," Asch said.

Low education levels and scores on military aptitude tests may be
tougher for the military to address because those reflect broader
societal problems, Asch added.

Building skills

In Houston, recruiters say they try to help young Hispanics ­ and
members of other ethnicities ­ meet educational and physical hurdles
before they head to boot camp.

To help youngsters having trouble in school, the Army is encouraging
them to use an Army-sponsored Web site called March2Success.com, said
local Army education coordinator Jose Castillo. It helps
high-schoolers improve math and vocabulary skills to perform better
on standardized tests.

But the Army's most aggressive program is a South Carolina school
that since August has been helping recruits attain GEDs right before boot camp.

'Fat camp' considered

That school could have helped a 21-year-old construction worker, also
named Jose Castillo,who tried to enlist last year. The Houston man
doesn't have a high school diploma or GED and said he was turned away
by Army recruiters.

"They just told me to come back when I had my GED," Castillo said.

"They just told me to come back when I had my GED," Castillo said.

The Army's lead recruiter, Maj. Gen. Thomas Bostick, has also said
that officials are considering a "fat camp" to help overweight
recruits meet physical standards. More than 40,000 of 250,000
youngsters failed their physicals due to weight issues last year.

For their part, Marine officials say their recruits are more fit than
others. But the Corps still sponsors weekly workout sessions at
recruiting stations to shape up recruits and discuss Marine life.
Marine spokesman Sgt. Alex Herron said the workouts include mostly
cardio exercises like running.

Pasadena recruiter Alfredo Uribe said one recruit had to shed about
80 pounds but did it.

Nieto, meanwhile, is aiming to get her weight just under 130 pounds.

She's nearing her goal, and says she's looking forward to boot camp.

"I'm very proud of what I've accomplished," Nieto said.
--

moises.mendoza@chron.com

.

Army to work with 10 New York area schools

Army to work with 10 New York area schools

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/02/ap_army_nyc_schools_021109/

By Karen Matthews - The Associated Press
Posted : Thursday Feb 12, 2009

NEW YORK ­ Students at 10 New York-area high schools will learn
skills from the Army under a program coordinated by the Public School
Athletic League and a nonprofit organization.

The program is designed to teach student-athletes "life skills" from
Army training, according to Academics in Motion, which operates in
nine New York City public high schools plus Hillside High School in New Jersey.

"Army recruiters are people with a very solid background in working
with young people and really serving as mentors," said Jim Presbrey,
co-founder of Academics in Motion.

He said the program "isn't about getting kids in the Army. It's about
helping kids develop their life goals and come up with a game plan to
meet them."

But Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil
Liberties Union, which has protested what it calls overly intrusive
military recruiting in city schools, said the program raises serious concerns.

"The Army has a long track record of targeting New York's poor black
and Latino populations with coercive and aggressive military
recruitment techniques, and now we are seeing potentially another
avenue for military recruitment in our schools ­ and with the
Department of Education's encouragement," Lieberman said.

Academics in Motion said in a news release last week that the
eight-week pilot program would begin this month, but a spokeswoman
said Wednesday that the start of the program was being revised and
pushed back to an unspecified later date.

The original press release said that the program will teach students
skills such as "goal setting, effective thinking, attention control
and memory," with the goal that it could become a national model.

Chris Coles, president of the parent-teacher association at Jamaica
High School in Queens, one of the schools where Academics in Motion
operates, said he thought parents there would welcome the Army's
participation in the program.

"I'm sure they wouldn't have a problem with it," he said. "It sounds good."

.

How Have Aghan - Iraq Wars Impacted Military Enlistment?

How Have Aghan - Iraq Wars Impacted Military Enlistment?

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/267055

Published Feb 11, 2009
by Carol Forsloff

Barack Obama declared that he hopes to wind down the war in Iraq and
bring the military home. The United States, however, will continue to
need recruits. How the war in Iraq and the recession will impact
military enlistment are important issues.
--

After starting the volunteer military program following the Vietnam
War, and terminating the draft, folks predicted disadvantaged youth
would form the bulk of the military. It was also believed that by
raising the educational requirements for service that military
training would improve with resulting better consequences for the
Armed Services. All of that has been true. There are, however, other
factors involved in selecting military service.

This article is based upon a review of some research and my 13 years
of direct experience evaluating servicemen completing their military
tenure. I evaluated about 600 folks transitioning from the military
per year and supervised the work of others assessing a great deal
more. Therefore I have objective data from long-term observations as
well as from collateral sources.

Prior to 1997 African American males considered the military a good
path toward greater mobility. They enlisted at higher percentage
rates than their white counterparts and remained in the military at
higher rates. After 1997, males of all races ages 16 - 21 began to
believe in increasing numbers that civilian work was important to
them and their future success. Recruiters then turned to seniors in
high schools, to bring up recruiting numbers.

A Princeton University study published 2005 found that there were
three areas of influence for joining the military. One was the
institutional presence of the military (family or geographical
location of a base with its community involvement), sociological
status and race. The study used data from Texas high school graduates
of 2002. The researchers found that factors influencing decisions are
number of deployments, dangers involved, changes in college costs and
changes in likelihood of youth coming into contact with the military.

Since the AVF (all volunteer force) was created, African Americans
were over represented among new enlistees relative to their
fractional percentage of the total population. They believed the
military could provide them an education and that it was less
discriminatory than the civilian environment. Military involvement,
however, has declined among the African Americans while the
percentage of Hispanic involvement has increased. In fact according
to California Military Entrance Processing 40 to 50% of new enlistees
in the California area were non-citizens. Statistics have also found
that those with the highest ability levels are also less likely to join.

The principal factor in enlistment is the presence of the military
institution and the degree of involvement of the military in the
community and life of the youth. Military presence raises odds of
enlistment by 25%. The study found that young men wanting at least
two years of college were twice as likely to enroll in college as
opposed to joining the military while those seeking a Bachelors
degree were 4 times as likely. Disadvantaged youth were 50% more
likely to enlist if they wanted a college degree as opposed to
wanting to work after high school. 68% offered educational benefits
as the key factor in selecting military service.

Clinical research indicates that emotional and physical debilitation
increases with the chronicity of war coupled with pre-existing
features. It is noted that perceived threats, concerns about life,
killing of civilians, torture considerations as well as length of
service in a difficult environment over time increases the potential
of emotional debilitation. Research also suggests that the
debilitation isn't diagnosed until years after the initial effects
(i.e. the Vietnam War is used as an example). Therefore it can effect
reenlistment as a choice, future performance in the military and in
the civilian community and additional educational attainment as a
probability..

Since the outbreak of the war in Iraq the drop in African American
recruits has been from 23.5% in 2000 to its present 14%. I found in
my own work that soldiers were worried about completing their
education or finding a job because of the potential they would be
recalled for the war.. Most of them had a high school education,
wanted to continue their schooling, but showed deficiencies in basic
skills, which supports the evidence that those with high aspirations
but less academic performance abilities had entered the military.

It appears from this data that it is true that the more functionally
educated are less likely to be in the conflict. Recruits may finish
high school at higher rates than they would ordinarily, however the
academic functioning may be less. Economic disadvantage and proximity
to a military community are key influences in a youth's decision to
join the military. Whether the youth is educated or not, this fact
does not reflect on patriotism, attention to duty during conflict or
any of those negatives, according to research material and
counselor's observations. But the fact remains--the less functionally
educated are more apt to be in this war, and to that extent John
Kerry was correct when he said so several years ago. Whether it was
said correctly or timely is a different issue entirely.

The recession is having an impact on recruitment now. In eastern
Indiana recruiters say that they are getting more and more people
joining the military partly in response to the downturn of the
economy. Whether the demographics of the military will change in
terms of educational levels will likely depend on the duration of the
recession and the impact on individuals at different educational and
socio-economic levels.
--

References: "Steady Drop in Black Recruits," by Josh White,
Washington Post, March 9, 2005. "Military Enlistment Decision-Making
Among Youth," Princeton University Study,2004. Iraq War Clinical
Guide 111: Returning Veteran of Iraq War: Background Issues and
Assessment Guidelines.

.

Army Recruiting Stand-Down Ordered for Friday

Army Recruiting Stand-Down Ordered for Friday

http://www.truthout.org/021309N

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/02/army_recruiterstanddown_021209w/

Friday 13 February 2009
by: Michelle Tan, The Army Times

A stand-down of the Army's entire recruiting force, ordered by
Army Secretary Pete Geren, will take place Friday.

Geren ordered the stand-down after a wide-ranging investigation
into four suicides in the Houston Recruiting Battalion. Poor command
climate, failing personal relationships and long, stressful work days
were factors in the suicides, the investigation found.

During the one-day stand-down, all 7,735 active Army and 1,797
Reserve recruiters will receive training on leadership, a review of
the expectations of Recruiting Command's leaders, suicide prevention
and resiliency training, coping skills and recruiter wellness.

Findings from the investigation, conducted by Brig. Gen. Del
Turner, deputy commanding general for Accessions Command, were
released Jan. 21, one week before the Army announced that suicides
among soldiers across the Army increased in 2008 to 129, the highest
rate in almost 30 years. In addition, the cause of death in 14 other
cases was pending. That means there could have been as many as 143
suicides in 2008.

A separate stand-down, for all soldiers, will take place over a
30-day period beginning Feb. 15. During those 30 days, commanders
across the Army will take time to provide their soldiers with
training ranging from how to recognize suicidal behavior and
intervention at the buddy level.

.

Should You Join the Military?

Letter to a Christian Young Man Regarding Joining the Military

http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance163.html

by Laurence M. Vance
February 13, 2009

The following letter was sent to a Christian young man I know who was
considering joining the military. He hasn't joined as of yet, and I
hope and pray that he doesn't. I am posting this letter publicly in
the hope that it might persuade some Christian young men I don't know
from joining the military.

Dear ______:

I have been told that you are thinking about joining the military. I
hope I am misinformed. I understand that you are having trouble
finding a job, but think that, as a Christian young man, you are
making a big mistake if you join today's military.

First of all, you were raised in a Christian home and went to
Christian schools your whole life. You will be needlessly exposed to
much wickedness in the military. You will unnecessarily face
temptations that you have never been exposed to. Why put yourself in
this position? It is a fact that there is a network of brothels
around the world to service U.S. troops stationed overseas. I know
that you are a clean young man and have a girlfriend, but don't
deceive yourself into thinking that you can remain clean in the
military. Because I write on war and military issues, I have scores
of veterans, Christian and otherwise, who have written me that will
back up everything I am saying.

Second, it is one thing to join the military out of a sense of
patriotism, but how does joining the military for financial reasons
make you any different than a mercenary? I know that sounds harsh,
but would you consider joining the military if you had a good job right now?

Third, the senseless wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have no end in
sight. There is no guarantee that you will not be sent to Iraq,
Afghanistan, or some other God-forsaken place where you could be in
danger of losing life or limb. And for what?

Fourth, you can't trust military recruiters. Like a car salesman,
they are trying to make their monthly quota. They have been caught on
tape lying to young men, even telling them that no troops were being
sent to Iraq anymore.

Fifth, I know that you have a very low opinion of the new president,
Barack Obama. I share your opinion completely. As a member of the
military, Obama would be your commander in chief. You could be sent
anywhere to fight for Obama. Are you willing to fight and possibly
die because Obama thinks it necessary to send American troops into
some other war?

Sixth, in the military, you will be expected to blindly follow the
orders of your officers. Independent thought is not tolerated. Please
consider the words of U.S. Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler
(1881–1940), a two-time Congressional Medal of Honor winner: "Like
all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of
my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in
suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is
typical with everyone in the military service." Major General Butler
became disillusioned with military service and wrote a famous book
called War Is a Racket in which he said: "War is a racket. It always
has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable,
surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope.
It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and
the losses in lives."

Seventh, the purpose of the U.S. military is to defend America. But
not only is the military not being used in defense of the country, it
is being used to guard the borders, patrol the coasts, and defend the
shores of other countries. The purpose of the military has been
perverted by the interventionist foreign policy of the United States.
There are American troops stationed in 147 countries and 10
territories. I know this for a fact because I have researched this in
official Department of Defense documents and written about it on many
occasions. The current use of the military is contrary to the
American Founding Fathers' policy of nonintervention in the affairs
of other countries.

Eighth, joining the military may have an adverse effect on your
future family. I know that you have a girlfriend that you are very
serious about. You should know that the breakup of marriages and
relationships because of soldiers being deployed to Iraq and
elsewhere is epidemic. Multiple duty tours and increased deployment
terms are the death knell for stable families. What makes you think
that the military will never send you away from your family for an
extended period of time? You know that the possibility exists, so why
gamble with your family? And then, as if being away from your family
wasn't bad enough on you and them, some soldiers come home with such
physical and/or mental problems that they are unable to return to
civilian life. Debt, doctors, and divorce lawyers soon consume their finances.

Ninth, joining the military means that you may be put into a position
where you will have to kill or be killed. What guarantee do you have
that you will be in a non-combat role? Can you in good conscience
pull the trigger against any "enemy" that the U.S. government sends
you thousands of miles away to kill?

And finally, you would have problems even if you went into the
military as a chaplain. Taxpayer-supported chaplains have to serve
two masters: God and the state. Compromise is inevitable. He that
pays the piper calls the tune. To become a chaplain in the U.S.
military, one must obtain an ecclesiastical endorsement from an
organization approved by the Pentagon as an Endorsing Ecclesiastical
Organization. According to the chaplain requirements, one of the
things that the endorsement should certify is that a military
chaplain should be "sensitive to religious pluralism and able to
provide for the free exercise of religion by all military personnel,
their family members and civilians who work for the Army." I know
that you are a conservative Christian and are averse to compromising
your religious convictions. You will, however, be expected to do just
that. As a chaplain, you would be expected to ask God to bless the
actions of U.S. troops even if they were fighting in an unjust war.
Can you in good conscience do this?

Please remember that if you join the military, there is no getting
out until your enlistment period is up. I hope and pray that you
don't make the mistake of joining.

In Christ Jesus our Savior,

Laurence Vance
--

If any readers are veterans, consider themselves to be Christians,
agree with the sentiments expressed in this letter, and would be
willing to let me append their name, branch, and rank to any future
use of this letter, please contact me. <lmvance@juno.com> The fact
that you "served" and I didn't might be what is needed to help
persuade some young man (or woman) to not join the military.

.

Thursday, February 12, 2009

A Response to: Bring Back the Draft

A Response to William Hauser and Jerome Slater

http://www.lewrockwell.com/kwiatkowski/kwiatkowski224.html

by Karen Kwiatkowski
February 12, 2009

William L. Hauser, a retired U.S. Army colonel and Jerome Slater, a
U.S. Navy veteran, just published a heartfelt yet humorous essay in
Foreign Policy entitled "Bring Back the Draft: Why a return to mass
conscription is the only way to win the war on terror."

The construct of this modest proposal is surprisingly defensive,
given that the authors claim that mass conscription will win the war
on terror. I mean, who doesn't want to win the "War on Terror"? After
describing an "ongoing struggle between radical Islam and Western
Democracy" and the lousy state of the American volunteer military
(over-extended, over-vaccinated, overweight, and overpaid), Hauser
and Slater put forth mandatory American national service as the cure
– more Americans to man-up and prepare to die for the government
overseas, with the remainder fearfully indoctrinated on the
necessities of eternal service and submission to the state.

They immediately list several means to control this massively
"enlarged military," and new ways to control this necessary expansion
of executive power. They agree with libertarians, traditional
conservatives, constitutionalists, democrats, the Green Party and
communists that we should have "legal safeguards to prevent
presidential unilateralism."

Beyond the constitution, that is. Many anti-Federalists feared that
the constitution had been drawn up to facilitate that very
unilateralism. Twenty-first century Americans only know that the
constitution we are taught to worship but never read has consistently
and abjectly failed to prevent the growth and the glory of
presidential unilateralism.

Thus the essay trips into comedy with its suggestions on the matter
of containment and restraint. It is true, had Bob Higgs been able to
explain the nature of the "ratchet effect" to these two
military-minded men, their faces would have paled, hands trembling
and chests heaving. Hauser and Slater propose that – and I quote in
its entirety:

"First, Congress should use its constitutionally mandated role in
decisions to go to war. Second, Congress should employ its
appropriations powers – "the power of the purse" – to prohibit,
limit, or end U.S. participation in unwise wars or military
interventions by refusing to fund them. Third, to reduce political
opposition to a revived draft as well as to provide another
constraint against presidential unilateralism, a law establishing
conscription should include a provision that draftees cannot be sent
into combat without specific congressional authorization."

Now, isn't that special! Sounds almost like the existing
Constitution, if it had spirit and an appetite. What a hilarious
concept! Henny Youngman couldn't have done better! Take my
Constitution…. Please!

To regain the attention of the sure-to-be-chuckling reader, the
authors proceed to identify the natural opponents of their simple
solution to the conflict of a millennium between radical Islam and
American democracy (both sides comic on their own merit, in the way a
fisherman's catch grows with each retelling). These natural opponents
to the draft are just four: civil libertarians (rights-obsessed
pacifists), classical libertarians (the founding fathers),
neoconservatives (who fear a draft would somehow constrain the
unilateral executive), and the military leadership itself.

There is a bit of a mystery here – in part due to the fact that the
greatest sector of society is missing from the draft debate. As the
"War on Terror" has made abundantly clear – neither civil rights
activists nor neoconservatives will be caught dead in uniform, draft
or no draft, albeit for completely opposite reasons. The Founders are
history, and in the 21st century we find a majority of their
descendents only tentatively discovering their predilections for
liberty, or else largely closeted for conformity's sake. The military
leadership is by definition dedicated to government service, and
moot. If government policy changes, they will support it or simply no
longer be "military leadership."

Spectacularly focusing on the minutia while ignoring the elephant in
the room is a common comedic technique. In this case, Hauser and
Slater have contrived a wonderful bit of literary slapstick. We watch
the fun with bated breath as the two authors focus and fret on the
Lilliputian opposition of three old men and a tired dog –
anticipating the moment when they look up and see the giant body of
unstoppable resistance – the draftees, their communities and
employers, and the waves of taxpayers who will pay for the young and
energetic to become temporarily enslaved to do the will of a
government that lives, and even thrills, to spend other people's
money as fast as it can rip it from their paychecks, projected tips
and expected earnings.

But the guttural and gigantic American resistance to universal
national service by those it will impact most is ignored – and I
suspect on purpose. The capstone of this incredibly funny proposal is
in the purported benefits of this new draft. Briefly and incredibly,
they are: 1) the military will become a more flavorful, if not
fascistic, purée of American race, religion and class; 2) politicians
will instantly become more responsible, more statesman-like, more
accountable, more moral (please, stop me before I write more.…); and
3) We can't accomplish the mission in Afghanistan if we don't have a draft.

The humor here is parody. The military must be all of us (how silly,
even the Spartans didn't go as far)! Might we hold the children and
grandchildren of all politicians hostage in the face of their various
votes for war, intervention and exportation of death? Certainly, we
may quickly and cheaply implement this fine idea without a universal
draft, and should do so post haste! Lastly – as we have no national
consensus about what we are doing or hoping to do in Afghanistan, why
would sending more Americans there be any part of a solution?

In conclusion, the authors proclaim that their own modest proposal
will soon be welcomed with open arms by all Americans. They write,
"Indeed, the reinstatement of the draft is not an invitation for more
war; it may be the best chance for peace."

If I suspected that the well-crafted and delicately composed Hauser
and Slater piece in Foreign Policy magazine was satire of the
exceptional sort rarely seen in American media, I knew it was when I
read that last sentence. Upon digesting this proposal, most Americans
will respond, much as did the contemporary readers of Jonathan
Swift's classic, with "He's got to be kidding!" or "How utterly
cruel!" And some of us will nod to each other and whisper, "What rare
subversive genius have we found here!"
--

LRC columnist Karen Kwiatkowski, Ph.D. [send her mail], a retired
USAF lieutenant colonel, has written on defense issues with a
libertarian perspective for MilitaryWeek.com, hosted the call-in
radio show American Forum, and blogs occasionally for
Huffingtonpost.com and Liberty and Power.

.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Teachers fall in line

[2 articles]

Teachers fall in line

http://timesfreepress.com/news/2009/feb/08/teachers-fall-line/?local

Feb. 8, 2009
By: Lauren Gregory

First of two parts

As a senior at Red Bank High School in 2002, Drew Gelbaugh didn't
have a career in mind, but his baseball coach and economics teacher,
Bumper Reese, had one for him: the U.S. Marine Corps.

Having attended the Marine Corps' Educators' Workshop ­ a four-day
program that gives teachers and counselors a firsthand look at boot
camp in Parris Island, S.C. ­ the coach was sure Mr. Gelbaugh was a
perfect fit.

"He had great leadership qualities, but he wasn't sure what he wanted
to do," Mr. Reese recalled. "He didn't want to be a burden on anyone,
and he didn't really know what he wanted to do in college."

All Mr. Reese had to do was make the introductions, recalled Mr.
Gelbaugh, now a sergeant in the Corps.

"A Marine recruiter came in, and before you know it I was signed up," he said.

Since then, Sgt. Gelbaugh has served in Iraq, Afghanistan and Japan
and already re-enlisted. He loves his job as an ordnance technician
at Beaufort Air Station just outside Parris Island and says he has
Mr. Reese ­ and the Educators' Workshop ­ to thank for it.

"I think it's a great idea," he said of the workshop. "This way,
other teachers can go back and talk to their students about the
Marines like mine did with me ... Otherwise, I wouldn't have even
thought twice about the Marine Corps."

Critics argue the workshop, at a taxpayer cost of more than $120,000,
is a marketing ploy that convinces well-meaning educators to help
recruiters reach vulnerable student populations.

"The schools are considered zones of influence, and they go after
those folks particularly," said Mike Ferner, president of the
nonprofit anti-war organization Veterans for Peace, based in St.
Louis, Mo., who called the program "a dog-and-pony show."

Sgt. Gelbaugh recently had a chance to share his enthusiasm with a
new group of teachers, including two from his alma mater, when an
Educators' Workshop was held at Parris Island and Beaufort last
month. The Marines also invited journalists to tag along, including a
reporter and photographer from the Chattanooga Times Free Press.

Sgt. Gelbaugh was among Marines chosen to participate in a panel
discussion outlining the opportunities the Corps afforded them. He
spoke to an audience of high school counselors, teachers and
administrators who soaked up the sense of pride he described.

"That feeling is obvious when you're down here," Travis Freeman, an
administrator with Anderson County, Tenn., schools, said later.

A few in the group were more skeptical, however.

"It's kind of like, 'What are they selling?' " remarked Wilder Lee, a
history teacher from Hamilton High School in Memphis.

"It's a sell"

The Educators' Workshop runs weekly from January through May,
rotating through groups from a different geographical region each
week. Educators from states east of the Mississippi River attend the
program at Parris Island, while those to the west travel to the
Marine Corps Recruit Depot in San Diego, Calif.

When the program began in the 1970s, educators paid their own way,
but in recent years, the Marine Corps has taken on the expense. The
Tennessee/Alabama workshop's budget was $123,000 for the four days,
officials said. Each trip includes hotel, meals and activities that
allow educators to experience M-16 rifles, the obstacle course and
even sparring sessions with martial arts instructors.

Allison Glass, education coordinator for the Mid-South Peace and
Justice Center in Memphis, said she is frustrated by the amount of
money put into the program. The center promotes peace, social justice
and human rights and runs an Alternatives to the Military Project to
inform high school students about nonservice-related scholarship and
apprenticeship programs.

"I do not think (the program) should be funded by taxpayer dollars," she said.

Maj. David Banning, commanding officer of the Nashville Recruiting
Station, said recruiters invite teachers who have little military
experience or a negative view of the military.

"It's not to sway you one way or the other," Maj. Banning told a
busload of educators on their way to the base on Jan. 13. "But you
are a trusted sounding board, and we just want you to be able to give
(your students) some answers from firsthand experience."

Arlene Inouye, a speech therapist in Los Angeles who attended the
workshop in California in 2005, said the program wins support from
teachers by appealing to their desire to discipline troublemakers.

"They make you feel important, they make you feel good and they show
you all the kids who have been helped," Ms. Inouye said. "It's a sell."

enthusiastic support

The majority of educators from Tennessee and Alabama on the visit
last month seemed supportive.

Educators pumped their fists as they hit targets on the firing range,
stared with mouths agape at huge jets, snapped photographs of
recruits marching about the base and whooped as their colleagues
completed obstacles on the confidence course.

When the group stopped at the base's commissary, participants loaded
shopping baskets with souvenir T-shirts, which some wore the next day
at the recruit graduation ceremony they were invited to watch.

With his cadence calls, drill Instructor Staff Sgt. Carlos Enriquez
became such a subject of fascination and admiration that participants
recorded his marching orders on their cell phones so they could use
them as ringtones.

A blogger from the Tennessee Independent Media Center, who raised his
hand several times to ask questions related to the war on terror and
the use of advanced weapons technology, was outnumbered. Each time he
spoke, some teachers shot each other looks as if to say, 'Here we go
again.' Ultimately, some Marines pulled the man aside to tell him
such questions were inappropriate for the setting because such
decisions were made by others well above those Marines' pay grades.

Mr. Freeman, the Anderson County administrator, said at the end of
the trip he was so impressed by the Marine Corps' discipline and
esprit de corps that he wanted to look into becoming a reservist himself.

"The more that I saw the drill marching and the (physical training)
stuff, I loved it," he said.

A group of educators from Etowah County, Ala., said they've had
little contact with recruiters at their school, but after the
workshop at Parris Island, they planned to approach their board of
education in hopes that military recruiting efforts could be expanded.

"I never realized how good for a kid this could be," said Page
Wright, a softball coach at Sardis High School in Boaz, Ala.

Recruiters welcome this kind of outcome from the trip, said Sgt.
Andrew Hurt, a public affairs officer for the Nashville Recruiting Battalion.

"This program can make a huge regional impact, because (through the
educators) we are reaching a large audience in a small amount of
time," Sgt. Hurt said.

Mr. Reese, the Red Bank High coach, said the program gives students
information about options so they can make a career choice that's
right for them.

"Some people may not understand it because they haven't seen it, and
they're ignorant of what actually happens," he said. "I don't think
(the Marine Corps) is a great option for everyone, and I don't think
anyone would ever tell you that. At the same time, I'm a teacher, and
I don't think college is a great option for everyone."

--------

A human face for the Corps

http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2009/feb/09/human-face-corps/

Feb. 9, 2009
By: Lauren Gregory

Wilder Lee always advised his students against joining the Marine Corps.

"They're just moving targets," the Memphis high school teacher said
as he waited to board an airplane that would take him to see the
"targets" up close at Parris Island, S.C., the Corps' East Coast
training facility.

Mr. Lee was among about 80 people invited on an all-expenses-paid,
four-day trip to Parris Island in January as part of the Marine
Corps' Educators' Workshop program. The program runs weekly from
January through May, rotating through educators from different
geographic districts across the country. Mr. Lee's group represented
schools under the Nashville and Montgomery, Ala., recruiting stations.

Recruiters specifically chose Mr. Lee and others with similar
opinions about the Marine Corps in an effort to show them some
stereotypes about Marines aren't accurate.

In a culture where knowledge of the Marine Corps is encapsulated in
the 1987 film "Full Metal Jacket" ­ with boot camp scenes framed by
profanity and violence ­ the Marines hope to get the message across
that they don't brutalize recruits.

Recruit training no longer allows drill instructors to curse at or
touch their charges. But few outsiders realize that, according to
Maj. Kathy Lee-Wood, executive officer of the female training
battalion on base and one of the workshop leaders.

"You hear all of the bad stories," Maj. Lee-Wood told workshop
participants at their welcome dinner Jan. 13. "What you don't hear
are all of the good stories."

the stigma

Marine Corps pride is strong within the ranks, but historically,
other branches of the service ­ and many civilians ­ have come to see
Marines in a somewhat negative light, said Bumper Reese, a Red Bank
High School teacher and coach who attended the Educators' Workshop
six years ago.

"Most people think the Marine Corps is just brash, raw. The dummies
of the service. Other branches have names for them, like 'bullet
stoppers' and things like that," said Mr. Reese, whose father was a
Marine. "But they're intelligent."

It is true that the Corps is "a very infantry-centric organization,"
said Lt. Col. Katherine Estes, commanding officer of Parris Island's
Support Battalion.

Marines are "riflemen first," agreed Brig. Gen. James Laster,
commander of recruit training for the eastern United States. At the
same time, he said, "We're not all about killing people. The
president may call on us to do that, but really, on a day-to-day
basis, our mission is to lead and mentor young people."

The Marine Corps doesn't want to be seen a last resort for troubled
youth, said Maj. Marty Steimle, operations branch head at Parris
Island. It wants to attract talented and intelligent individuals just
like other branches such as the Air Force, which advertises highly
technical jobs that translate well to the civilian work force, he said.

"There's this stigma: You either go to jail or you go into the Marine
Corps," Maj. Steimle said. "We want to show the educators that this
is a legitimate opportunity for top students."

recruit quality

The Marines are attracting high-quality recruits, boasted Brig. Gen.
Laster, noting that 95 percent of recruits are high school graduates
and 63 percent score in the top three categories on the Armed
Services Vocational Aptitude Battery test.

In January, workshop organizers introduced participants to a number
of Marines whose jobs weren't on the front lines. They also presented
a panel to address the educational and apprenticeship opportunities
Marines can tackle ­ while on active duty and afterward through the GI Bill.

They also confronted the much-publicized issue of enlistment waivers
for felony convictions. Enlistment standards are high, and recruiters
don't want to see drug use, medical problems or excessive tattoos,
according to Maj. William Sauerland, commanding officer of the
Montgomery, Ala., recruiting station.

With drug use, he said, "it depends on the type and quantity ­
experimentation versus hard drug use. So we look at the whole
individual, because if they just used drugs maybe once or twice, they
can probably get a waiver," he said.

Other felonies are waiverable as well, he said, though recruiters
weigh the severity and frequency of any criminal offenses before
approving waivers.

"I don't want people to think that we are opening this up to
crackheads and felons," he cautioned.

HUMANIZING THE 'BOOGEYMAN'

Part of the Corps' image overhaul involves breaking stereotypes about
the automaton qualities of the Marines and their often-caricatured
drill instructors.

"The drill instructor is almost a mythical creature," said Col.
Jeffery Peterson, chief of staff of the Eastern Recruiting Region.
"We want you to realize that they're not some machine. When you cut
them, they bleed. When their mother passes away, they cry. They are
real people."

Staff Sgt. Carlos Enriquez was the Tennessee educator group's drill
instructor throughout the week, yelling as he would to recruits when
appropriate but breaking from character periodically to rib his
charges playfully about their lack of marching skills or describe his
role as a father figure to new recruits.

Col. Peterson said he hopes the workshop experience with Staff Sgt.
Enriquez would give teachers a better understanding of how recruits
are molded into Marines.

"When you create transparency, you take some of that boogeyman stuff
out of it," he said.

Past participants have questioned the actual level of transparency
involved in the Educators' Workshops.

The drill instructors' demeanor with educators doesn't exactly
reflect basic training, said Arlene Inouye, a speech therapist in Los
Angeles who attended the workshop in San Diego, Calif., in 2005.

"The discrepancies really got to me, and that's what I didn't know if
the other teachers there understood," said Ms. Inouye, who founded
the Coalition Against Militarism in Our Schools in 2003.

"They put us up in a high-class hotel, they gave us free time and
they allowed us to ask all the questions we wanted," she recalled.
"That's totally different from what a real recruit would go through."

Mr. Lee also questioned the motives of his hosts, even after
returning home from the trip.

"I still believe they're training to be moving targets," he said in a
telephone interview last week. "I understand what they do better now,
so I'm going to tell some of my kids about it, but only the type of
kids who have the fortitude for it."

That's all the Marines can hope for, said Maj. David Banning,
commanding officer of the Nashville Recruiting Station.

Although the Marine Corps is currently ahead of its recruiting goals,
the competition to keep it that way is fierce.

"We're in competition with every other company, with every other
business, for the best and the brightest," he said.
--

Article: Teachers fall in line
http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2009/feb/08/teachers-fall-line/

Article: Educator workshops a longstanding tradition
http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2009/feb/08/educator-workshops-longstanding-tradition/

Blog: Sour ending to Marine Corps experience
http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2009/feb/08/sour-ending-marine-corps-experience/

PhotoGallery: The Marine Corps Educators Workshop
http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2009/feb/08/photogallery-marine-corps-educators-workshop/

Video: The Marine Corps Educators Workshop
http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2009/feb/07/video-marine-corps-educators-workshop/

By the numbers

24: Number of workshops held each year between Parris Island, S.C.
and Camp Pendleton, Calif.

2,000 to 2,400: Number of educators across the county who participate
in workshops annually

68: Number of Marine recruiters in Tennessee

$123,000: Budget for four-day Tennessee/Alabama workshop

IN THEIR OWN WORDS

Tara Tharpe, English teacher, Red Bank High School
"At first, I really didn't know why I was coming, but now I can't
wait to go back and talk to my (students) about this. There are
opportunities (in the Marine Corps) other than combat; there are lots
of educational opportunities as well... This just has really opened
my eyes. I never really sat down and had conversations with people
like this before."

Shedrick Spencer, guidance program coordinator, Mobile County, Ala.,
Public Schools
"I'm really skeptical of this because of the times. I can't in good
conscience send these kids to war. I get the propaganda they're
selling over there at the Marine Corps base. They're thinking that
it's most definitely good for a lot of kids, but I'm not going to
suggest it now."

Amy LeVally, biology and anatomy teacher, Red Bank High School
"I will definitely tell the kids more about it. It's not for
everybody, but I can think of a million different kids it would be
good for. I really want to go do this with the other branches now to
see the difference."

.