Saturday, November 15, 2008

Army to Use Webcasts From Iraq for Recruiting

Army to Use Webcasts From Iraq for Recruiting

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/11/business/media/11adco.html

By STUART ELLIOTT
Published: November 10, 2008

FOR the last two years, the Army has presented itself to potential
recruits as the way to become "Army strong." Beginning on Tuesday,
Veterans Day, the Army will seek to make its pitch stronger by making
the campaign more relevant to the desired audience of Americans ages 17 to 24.

One new feature on a redesigned version of the Army Web site
(goarmy.com) called "Straight From Iraq" states, "Now you can find
out what it's really like to be deployed in the Middle East from the
men and women stationed there."

"Soldiers are ready to take your questions," says a section of the
site devoted to a webcast series. The feature represents the first
time that visitors can ask questions of soldiers deployed overseas as
well as the first time the Iraq war has been referred to so directly
and prominently on the Web site.

The goal is to provide those considering the Army ­ along with
parents and others who influence their decisions ­ with "verifiable
information about what being a soldier is really like, what combat is
really like," said Lt. Gen. Benjamin C. Freakley, commanding general
of the Army Accessions Command in Fort Monroe, Va., which is
overseeing recruitment.

The changes in the "Army strong" campaign place more emphasis on the
Internet, event marketing and other methods that connect with young
Americans on a closer, more personal level.

To help pay for the new media features, cutbacks are being made in
areas like the Army's sponsorships of professional rodeos.

The changes include an additional theme for the campaign, "Strength
like no other," which will appear along with "Army strong"; a focus
on the skills that recruits can learn in the Army, to make a stronger
case about how serving can bring personal and career success later in
life; and new information about becoming an officer.

"The campaign has been successful conveying the benefits of 'Army
strong,' the physical, emotional and mental benefits," said Ed
Walters, chief marketing officer for the Army at the Pentagon.

"We wanted to more clearly articulate that," he added, through
efforts like sharing with civilians the video clips of "real
soldiers' stories."
--

The "Army strong" campaign is produced by nine agencies, eight of
them part of the McCann Worldgroup division of the Interpublic Group
of Companies. The Army ad budget from 2006 through 2011 is estimated
at $1.35 billion.

The Army has met its recruiting goals for the first two fiscal years
during which the "Army strong" campaign has appeared. Critics of the
military's practices contend that bonuses being awarded to recruits
as well as less stringent entry standards have also helped meet the goals.

"We love the 'Army strong' campaign because it resonates with youth,"
General Freakley said, and it "says in a nutshell who our soldiers
are, that it is a strength they get by serving."

"This is a progression, an evolution," he added, referring to the new
phase of the campaign.

In addition to the new content on goarmy.com, there will be new TV
commercials, meant to help drive traffic to the Web site. The first
ones compare the Army to a company, a team and a school by showing
young men and women in settings like an office building, a gym and a
campus. The scenes shift into scenes of soldiers performing military
tasks like marching and saluting the flag.

In the gym commercial, young athletes are seen working out, then
stacking sandbags. "There is a team like no other team in the world,"
says the narrator, the actor Gary Sinise, who took over the narration
work for the campaign last year from the actor Josh Charles.

"When they raise their flag in victory, you will know what these men
and women are fighting for," Mr. Sinise says, "and you will feel
fortunate to be counted among them."

In the office commercial, young workers in business attire suddenly
start climbing walls. "This company is filled with dreamers," Mr.
Sinise says, "but they also have courage, strength and honor, and
when they leave this company it will be with a thousand opportunities
and the respect of millions."

The intent is "to show the Army in a way you haven't thought about
it," said Craig Markus, executive creative director at McCann
Erickson Worldwide in New York, one of the McCann Worldgroup agencies
working on the campaign.

"Obviously, the buzzword right now is 'relevance,' " he added, "and
we're trying to talk to people in a way that's relevant to them at the moment."

Coincidentally, it turns out the campaign was developed months before
the start of the steep economic downturn. The growing unemployment
rate could benefit the Army because young men and women may enlist
rather than search fruitlessly for work.

"History will tell you that's true," Mr. Markus said, "but I'm not
going to predict what may happen."

The other McCann Worldgroup agencies working on the campaign are:
Casanova Pendrill, for ads aimed at Hispanics; the IW Group, for ads
aimed at Asian-Americans; Momentum, for event marketing and
sponsorships; MRM Worldwide, for the Web site, digital marketing and
direct marketing; NAS Recruitment, for medical recruiting; Universal
McCann, for media planning and buying; and Weber Shandwick, for
public relations.

Another agency, Carol H. Williams Advertising, is creating ads aimed
at African-American recruits.
--

Other changes the Army is making include reworking the content of the
Virtual Army Experience, a traveling interactive exhibit with games
and other displays that is intended for an audience as young as 13.
There have been complaints that the exhibit is inappropriate because
it makes combat seem to be fun.

"If we show the Army fighting, people say it's violent," General
Freakley said. "If we don't, people say it's not truthful."

The new content for the exhibit will concentrate on the peaceful
purposes the Army can serve, he added, like providing humanitarian aid.

The new elements of the "Army strong" campaign aimed at so-called
influencers like parents are scheduled to start in January. Such ads
have been part of the campaign since it began in 2006.

.

Recruiting Successes Continue in Fiscal 2009

Recruiting Successes Continue in Fiscal 2009

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=51881

By Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Nov. 10, 2008 – Recruiting successes in fiscal 2008
continued into the first month of the new fiscal year, with all
active and reserve components meeting or exceeding their October
goals, defense officials reported today.

Recruiting remained solid across the board, with the Army leading the
effort by exceeding its active-duty goal by 1 percent, its Army
National Guard goal by 16 percent and its Army Reserve goal by 10
percent, officials said. The Army signed on 5,324 active-duty
soldiers in October, as well as 6,487 National Guardsmen and 3,049 reservists.

The Marine Corps topped its October active-duty recruiting goal by 4
percent and its Marine Corps Reserve goal by 51 percent, officials
reported. The Marines recruited 2,983 new active-duty members and 968
reservists.

The Navy reported a strong recruiting month as well, reaching its
goals of 2,930 active-duty sailors and 664 reservists.

The Air Force also met its October goals by signing on 3,336
active-duty airmen and 856 reservists. The Air National Guard
exceeded its monthly goal by 20 percent, with 913 recruits.

The October recruiting successes came on the heels of strong fiscal
2008 recruiting successes, with all military services and their
reserve components meeting or exceeding their goals.

David S.C. Chu, undersecretary of defense for personnel and
readiness, called 2008 the strongest recruiting year since fiscal 2004.

In addition to attracting numbers, officials emphasized, recruiters
brought in quality members. More than 92 percent of recruits hold a
high school diploma, contrasted with 75 percent of the general U.S.
population in the same age range, officials said.

Nearly 70 percent of new active-duty recruits came from the top half
of those in the United States testing highest in math and verbal
aptitude, and about three-quarters of new recruits come from
neighborhoods that are at or above the U.S. median annual household
income of about $50,000.

"[It] is a great tribute to the qualities of America's youth today,
their willingness to step forward, and their willingness to serve,"
Chu said. "The fact that we are getting some of the best and
brightest in our society is a great tribute to the spirit that young
people put into the notion of public service today."

.

Military recruitment center feels city's support

Military recruitment center feels city's support

http://www.theolympian.com/670/story/654523.html

By Christian Hill | The Olympian
Published November 08, 2008

LACEY – Friday's event at the new military recruiting center in Hawks
Prairie was both a reception and a thank-you.

The center was vandalized Oct. 30, three days after the recruiters
moved from the old center on Sleater-Kinney Road.

Vandals broke two windows and left graffiti including phrases such as
"Stop the war" and "No war." A government-owned van was tagged. A
letter found at the scene compared military recruiting to Nazi Germany.

Community reaches out

The recruiter considered canceling the planned reception but changed
course after receiving many words of encouragement from residents and
employees of nearby businesses.

"Even if we had boards in the windows, we weren't going to cancel
it," said Scott Lawrence, chief of advertising and public affairs for
the Army recruiting battalion based in Seattle.

Added Capt. Michael Bromand, commander of the recruiting company
based in Olympia: "The support has just been overwhelming."

Six sworn in

The recruiters welcomed visitors with kind words and refreshments. A
Tacoma radio station broadcast live from the event. During the
two-hour event, Bromand swore in six new soldiers.

It's the sixth time in three months in which Army property has been
vandalized. Other incidents occurred at recruiting centers in
Everett, Olympia, Spanaway and Tacoma. The cost to taxpayers to
repair the damage is more than $8,800, according to Army officials.

Lacey police detective Jeremy Knight said no suspects have been
identified. He said the vandalism could be linked to a similar
incident a week earlier at the headquarters of the Thurston County
Democratic Party.

Anyone with information is asked to call Lacey police at 360-459-4333
or Thurston County Area Crime Stoppers at 360-493-2222.
--

Christian Hill is a reporter for The Olympian. He can be reached at
360-754-5427 or chill@theolympian.com.

.

Army to probe recruiter suicides

Army to probe recruiter suicides

http://www.news-journal.com/news/content/news/stories/2008/11/08/11082008_recruiter_suicide.html

By MAGGIE SOUZA
Saturday, November 08, 2008

The Army has agreed to investigate a disproportionate cluster of
suicides among recruiters in an East Texas battalion - news that a
local Army widow said she was relieved to hear.

Secretary of the Army Pete Geren said the investigation also will
focus on allegations from other soldiers and family members that they
were pressured to cover up serious problems in the battalion.

"I think (the upcoming investigation) is excellent," said Amanda
Henderson, whose husband, Sgt. 1st Class Patrick G. Henderson,
committed suicide in September. "It needs to be looked into. ... I
applaud Sen. Cornyn for getting involved in this and bringing it to a stop."

The investigation was sought by U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, who
heard from soldiers and family members after the Houston Chronicle
reported the cluster of suicides earlier this year.

Cornyn, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, complained
to Geren in a letter that recruiters and family members felt some
battalion leaders were "working to cover up serious problems that
evidence a toxic command climate and poor unit morale."

Cornyn told The Associated Press on Friday that he's concerned about
the Houston battalion, but noted "it also has implications militarywide."

Henderson, who worked as a Army recruiter in Nacogdoches, said she
was interviewed about the suicides a few weeks ago by internal staff.
She described the questions as non-standard. For instance, she said,
she was asked about why no autopsy was ordered, questioned about drug
usage and asked whether she had been having an affair. Henderson said
she felt they were inappropriate and insulting questions.

"I'm not mad at the Army," said Henderson, 32. "I'm mad at the people
in recruiting who are trying to disregard this situation, say, 'Let's
chalk it up to personal and marital problems and go on.' This is a problem."

Patrick Henderson is one of five recruiters from a Houston-based
battalion who committed suicide in recent years, according to the AP.
Since 2001, 17 Army recruiters have committed suicide, the AP reported.

The Houston-based battalion recruits from East Texas, including the
Longview and Marshall. Henderson, 35, had been working as a
recruiter, though he wasn't actively recruiting at the time of his
death, according to Army records. Records say Henderson was reporting
to the Tyler recruiting headquarters.

His Sept. 20 death came six weeks after Staff Sgt. Larry Flores Jr.,
stationed in the Nacogdoches recruiting office, hanged himself.
Flores, 26, was Amanda Henderson's boss.

"This did not happen over night," Henderson said. "It's been a
continual problem in recruiting, but people are scared to talk about
it because your job is on the line 24/7."

There are 38 recruiting battalions nationwide with 8,400 recruiters.

Armywide, the suicide rate has been climbing as the war in Iraq has
forced multiple and longer deployments. Roughly 450 active-duty
soldiers have committed suicide since 2003, with the highest numbers
coming in the last couple of years.

Cornyn acknowledged in an interview Friday the heavy pressure the
all-volunteer military service is under to sign recruits and retain
soldiers during two wars.

Henderson said both she and her husband always felt the strain of
their responsibilities.

"I remember specifically as a Nacogdoches recruiter that we were told
we ought to feel privileged to be out here and get to go home to our spouses."

That was hardly the case, she said. Long hours on both her and her
husband's end made seeing each other difficult.

Henderson said her husband started having problems after Flores
committed suicide.

"I was having a very hard time with my boss's death, and he was there
for me. Then I saw him spiraling down," Henderson said. She stressed
that her husband had always been a loving father and a proud soldier.
She believed that he would be OK.

But three weeks before his suicide, her husband came close to killing
himself, she said. After the incident, he was admitted into a
rehabilitation center, and released four days later.

Henderson said she was told by Army staff to keep him calm. She tried
to get him counseling, she said, but her work hours kept her from
being able to ensure that he was getting help.

"I tried to get him as much help as I could and I tried to be there,
but we worked under the same command," Henderson said. "I was told to
get back out there and do my job. There's no humanity in this job at all."

Henderson doesn't work in the Nacogdoches office any more. She is
waiting to be transferred, she said, and does not know what she'll be doing.

Henderson explained that she does not want to leave the Army. She
enjoys serving in the military.

"I care about my career and my son," she said. "I'm not going to stop
doing what I like."

.

Third-graders learn about serving in Iraq

Third-graders learn about serving in Iraq

http://www.pantagraph.com/articles/2008/11/09/news/doc491797db50048302711550.txt

By Phyllis Coulter
pcoulter@pantagraph.com
November 9, 2008

NORMAL -- About 100 third-graders at Prairieland Elementary School
know how to properly fold a flag, what it's like in Iraq, and how
prepackaged Army meals taste.

"They are very engaged," said Bethany Gebur, a U.S. Army sergeant and
student teacher from Illinois State University who helped arrange a
visit from Army recruiters, and craft activities and lessons about
military values.

For Gebur, Veterans Day is something personal that should be shared.

Her husband, U.S. Army Spc. Ron Gebur, died when a bomb struck his
Humvee near Baghdad in 2006. Bethany Gebur served stateside and in Korea.

Gebur, who hopes to become a Unit 5 teacher, is raising the couple's
son Gage, 3, who eventually will attend Grove Elementary School.

"I lost my husband, but this is about all soldiers," she said of a
display that included his army helmets, an honor flag and his photo.

She helped plan a week of lessons with teacher Nancy Harp and fellow
student teacher Katy Reihsmann of Illinois Wesleyan University. On
Friday, students saw pictures of Iraqi schools built by American
soldiers and heard about Army life.

"We learned about Army values," said Kearsten Personette, 8, who sees
the military as a potential career choice. She easily recited Army
values, noting "respect" is among top values at her school.

Gebur sorted MREs (meals ready to eat) for a taste test. "They're not
going to like them anyway," Gebur said. "When I was starving, I
didn't like them, so when they're not hungry …"

To her surprise, most of the children liked most of the food.

In Iraq, Staff Sgt. Brian Rychetsky of Bloomington and Cpl. Jason
Rouch of Colfax, now recruiters, had very different experiences with
military food.

Rychetsky, a 17-year Army veteran who enlisted to save money for
college, ate in a cafeteria or at Burger King or Subway while he was
a helicopter mechanic posted in Iraq.

In contrast, Rouch was thankful for one bottle of water and a couple
of MREs a day eaten on the desert sand.

"I had a pretty nice life," Rychetsky said, other than being away
from his wife and daughters.

"I went 42 days without a shower," Rouch said, explaining he tried to
keep clean by using bottled water to wash up. He used a poncho and a
pole to make a temporary tent and sometimes woke in a sleeping bag
covered with several inches of sand after a night storm. The day he
left Iraq, the temperature was 148 degrees on the tarmac.

He started active duty Jan. 1, 2001, and served until 2004 before
returning as a recruiter.

The children learned Velcro on new uniforms is noisy, but helmets are
more comfortable, and that Rouch saw the Eiffel Tower, Leaning Tower
of Pisa and many European wonders.

Rychetsky's favorite soldiers are his two sisters, who joined the
Army long after he and his brother. They both served at least once in
Iraq. "They stopped their lives to go over there," he said.

Rychetsky's favorite job was building a school in Iraq. The admitted
"tough guy" said he cried when he saw the joy on the faces of
children who never had a school before.

.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Raped in the Military? You May Have to Pay for Your Own Forensic Exam Kit

Raped in the Military? You May Have to Pay for Your Own Forensic Exam Kit

http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/106307/raped_in_the_military_you%27ll_have_to_pay_for_your_own_forensic_exam_kit/

By Penny Coleman
November 11, 2008.

This outrage gives "supporting the troops" a whole new meaning.
--

Editor's note: a correction was made to this story since publication.
The uncorrected version stated incorrectly that the military doesn't
cover forensic exam kits for the 20 percent of rape victims treated
on military bases.
--

Sarah Palin's decision not to pay for rape kits when she was mayor of
Walsilla was an issue in the campaign for the White House. But allow
me to introduce the large pink elephant that has been sitting quietly
in the corner of the room:

At the Winter Soldier Investigation in March, Spec. Patricia McCann,
who served in Iraq with the Illinois Army National Guard from 2003-4,
read a memo issued to all MEDCOM commanders clarifying that "SAD
kits"-- which are forensic rape kits--"are not included in TRICARE coverage." *

TRICARE, the United States Department of Defense Military Health
System that covers active duty members, will only pay for rape kits
if the victim is seen in a military or a VA facility.

But the Pentagon acknowledges that 80 percent of military rapes are
never reported. And that 80 percent who go off-base to protect their
anonymity (and/or their careers) are on their own. If a soldier is on
leave, or is five-hours from the nearest VA, or if a soldier is
simply delivered to the nearest hospital by the local ambulance
driver, their rape kits are not covered under TRICARE. Neither are
other forensic exams that might be used in domestic violence situations.

Front-line treatment shouldn't be conditional on where a rape occurs
or where the nearest treatment is available. This is not only a
parity issue, but a further obstacle to treatment and justice.

Women in the military are twice as likely to be raped as their
civilian counterparts. In fact, "women serving in the U.S. military
today are more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by
enemy fire in Iraq," Congresswoman Jane Harman, D-Calif., told the
House Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs in May.

Harman said, "The scope of the problem was brought into acute focus
for me during a visit to the West Los Angeles VA Health Center where
I met female veterans and their doctors. My jaw dropped when the
doctors told me that 41 percent of the female veterans seen there say
they were victims of sexual assault while serving in the military,
and 29 percent said they were raped during their military service."

In July, a House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee hearing
subpoenaed Kaye Whitley, director of the Pentagon's Sexual Assault
Prevention and Response Office (SAPRO), to explain what the
department is doing to stop the escalating sexual violence in the
military. Her boss, Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, ordered her
not to appear.

Whitley was finally made available to the committee on Sept. 10, but
only after having been threatened with a contempt citation.

Whitley first informed the committee that the DoD was conducting a
"crusade against sexual assault."

She then sought to reassure the committee with an accounting of all
the heroic measures the Pentagon is planning to implement in the very
near future.

But finally, she had to admit that in 2007 there were 2,688 sexual
assaults in the military, including 1,259 reports of rape. Just 8
percent (181) of those cases were referred to courts martial,
compared to a civilian prosecution rate of 40 percent. And almost
half of those cases were dismissed without investigation. (And I say
Whitley "had to admit" the number of cases because in 2004, Congress
woke up to the fact that the DoD was blowing off the issue and
required the military to make yearly reports on all matters relating
to sexual assault in the Armed Forces. But those reports did not
indicate either prioritizing or progress -- hence the hearings.)

Rep. John Tierney, D-Mass., asked the committee if anyone thought
that "ordering its employees to ignore subpoenas to discuss the
topic" sounded as if DoD was taking any of this seriously. "Let me be
very clear. Preventing and responding to sexual assault perpetrated
against our soldiers is simply much too important to be playing a
game of cat and mouse." He later told Stars and Stripes that there
are only seven people on Whitley's staff to devise and implement the
military's sexual assault program for the entire military. That
number speaks for itself.

This is not news. As far back as 1995, Reuters reported that "Ninety
percent of women under 50 who have served in the U.S. military and
who responded to a survey report being victims of sexual harassment,
and nearly one-third of the respondents of all ages say they have been raped."

Furthermore, the Pentagon acknowledges that 80 percent of military
rapes are not reported in the first place, suggesting that the actual
number, if it were known, would be astronomical.

Cat-and-mouse games may sound like kid stuff, but refusing to pay for
a rape kit is anything but. It implies that the victim is to blame.
It does not encourage victims to come forward. And it makes it far
more likely that soldiers will interpret the permissive climate as
institutionally sanctioned misogyny.

In her Winter Soldier testimony, McCann noted, "The assistant
secretary of defense is soliciting legislative changes to TRICARE
benefits which will include these kits within covered TRICARE supplies."

I have been in touch with the office of the assistant secretary, S.
Ward Casscells, M.D. It seems that he has indeed solicited such
legislation, and it is due to go into effect in December as an
amendment to the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for
fiscal year 2007. The amendment contains some "background" that is
worth sharing.

Currently, forensic examinations are not covered for beneficiaries in
civilian health care facilities through TRICARE medical plans because
TRICARE "may cost share only medically or psychologically necessary
services or supplies. Forensic examinations are not conducted for
medical treatment purposes, but for the preservation of evidence in
any future criminal investigation and/or prosecution."

The decision to treat rape kits as purely evidentiary, ignoring the
very real medical and psychological benefits to the victim, is
reprehensibly primitive thinking. Making sure that those legislative
changes happen as planned would be a long overdue step out of the
primal ooze that has slimed our military in the eyes of our citizens
and the world.

Speaking to Palin's decision not to pay for rape kits, the former
governor of Alaska, Tony Knowles, was quoted in Palin's hometown
paper, the Frontiersman, as saying, "We would never bill the victim
of a burglary for fingerprinting and photographing the crime scene,
or for the cost of gathering other evidence. Nor should we bill rape
victims just because the crime scene happens to be their bodies."

When Barack Obama decides who he will appoint to head the Department
of Veterans Affairs in his administration, he should consider
appointing someone who also understands how important it is that
women's bodies, souls, dignity and health be taken seriously. Tammy
Duckworth, who is reported to be at the top of his list, certainly
has had personal experience with a health care delivery system she
has called "a little bit arcane."

Duckworth is now director of the Illinois Department of Veterans
Affairs, but in 2004, she was a Blackhawk helicopter pilot in Iraq
and lost both of her legs in a crash. She describes the care she
received at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as "excellent," but adds,
"the comfort package I received contained men's Jockey shorts, and
the local VA hospital carried Viagra but not my birth control."

There are currently about 1.7 million female veterans in the United
States, and the Department of Defense estimates that there are about
200,000 women, 15 percent of the military, on active duty.
Thirty-nine percent of those women return from Iraq or Afghanistan
with mental health issues, and, for more than a third who seek VA
health care, the precipitating trauma was a sexual assault.

Every VA center now screens both men and women for sexual trauma.
That is an improvement. Still, Duckworth says, "I don't think the VA
mental health care system is ready for (female veterans)." It would
be encouraging to see a VA director who has some understanding of how
important that is to fix.
--

*The overwhelming indictment of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan --
and the heartbreaking devastation they have wrought on the souls of
young American soldiers -- are now the subject of an invaluable book
edited by Aaron Glantz and issued by Haymarket Books.
--

Penny Coleman is the widow of a Vietnam veteran who took his own life
after coming home. Her latest book, Flashback: Posttraumatic Stress
Disorder, Suicide and the Lessons of War, was released on Memorial Day 2006.

.

Raped in the Military? You'll Have to Pay for Your Own Forensic Exam Kit

Raped in the Military? You'll Have to Pay for Your Own Forensic Exam Kit

http://www.truthout.org/111108WA

Tuesday 11 November 2008
by: Penny Coleman, AlterNet

This outrage gives "supporting the troops" a whole new meaning.

Sarah Palin's decision not to pay for rape kits when she was
mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, was an issue in the campaign for the White
House. But allow me to introduce the large pink elephant that has
been sitting quietly in the corner of the room: TRICARE, the
Pentagon's Military Health System that covers active duty members,
doesn't pay for rape kits, either.

Spec. Patricia McCann, who served in Iraq with the Illinois Army
National Guard from 2003 to 2004, raised the issue at the Winter
Soldier Investigation in March. McCann read a memo issued to all
MEDCOM commanders clarifying that "SAD kits" - which are forensic
rape kits - "are not included in TRICARE coverage." *

That would put Alaska and the military in a very special category.

Women in the military are twice as likely to be raped as their
civilian counterparts. In fact, "women serving in the U.S. military
today are more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by
enemy fire in Iraq," Congresswoman Jane Harman, D-Calif., told the
House Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs in May.

Harman said, "The scope of the problem was brought into acute
focus for me during a visit to the West Los Angeles VA Health Center
where I met female veterans and their doctors. My jaw dropped when
the doctors told me that 41 percent of the female veterans seen there
say they were victims of sexual assault while serving in the
military, and 29 percent said they were raped during their military service."

In July, a House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee
hearing subpoenaed Kaye Whitley, director of the Pentagon's Sexual
Assault Prevention and Response Office (SAPRO), to explain what the
department is doing to stop the escalating sexual violence in the
military. Her boss, Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, ordered her
not to appear.

Whitley was finally made available to the committee on Sept. 10,
but only after having been threatened with a contempt citation.

Whitley first informed the committee that the DoD was conducting
a "crusade against sexual assault."

She then sought to reassure the committee with an accounting of
all the heroic measures the Pentagon is planning to implement in the
very near future.

But finally, she had to admit that in 2007 there were 2,688
sexual assaults in the military, including 1,259 reports of rape.
Just 8 percent (181) of those cases were referred to courts martial,
compared to a civilian prosecution rate of 40 percent. And almost
half of those cases were dismissed without investigation. (And I say
Whitley "had to admit" the number of cases because in 2004, Congress
woke up to the fact that the DoD was blowing off the issue and
required the military to make yearly reports on all matters relating
to sexual assault in the Armed Forces. But those reports did not
indicate either prioritizing or progress - hence the hearings.)

Rep. John Tierney, D-Mass., asked the committee if anyone
thought that "ordering its employees to ignore subpoenas to discuss
the topic" sounded as if DoD was taking any of this seriously. "Let
me be very clear. Preventing and responding to sexual assault
perpetrated against our soldiers is simply much too important to be
playing a game of cat and mouse." He later told Stars and Stripes
that there are only seven people on Whitley's staff to devise and
implement the military's sexual assault program for the entire
military. That number speaks for itself.

This is not news. As far back as 1995, Reuters reported that
"Ninety percent of women under 50 who have served in the U.S.
military and who responded to a survey report being victims of sexual
harassment, and nearly one-third of the respondents of all ages say
they have been raped."

Furthermore, the Pentagon acknowledges that 80 percent of
military rapes are not reported in the first place, suggesting that
the actual number, if it were known, would be astronomical.

Cat-and-mouse games may sound like kid stuff, but refusing to
pay for a rape kit is anything but. It implies that the victim is to
blame. It does not encourage victims to come forward. And it makes it
far more likely that soldiers will interpret the permissive climate
as institutionally sanctioned misogyny.

In her Winter Soldier testimony, McCann noted, "The assistant
secretary of defense is soliciting legislative changes to TRICARE
benefits which will include these kits within covered TRICARE supplies."

I have been in touch with the office of the assistant secretary,
S. Ward Casscells, M.D. It seems that he has indeed solicited such
legislation, and it is due to go into effect in December as an
amendment to the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for
fiscal year 2007. The amendment contains some "background" that is
worth sharing.

Currently, forensic examinations are not covered for
beneficiaries in civilian health care facilities through TRICARE
medical plans because TRICARE "may cost share only medically or
psychologically necessary services or supplies. Forensic examinations
are not conducted for medical treatment purposes, but for the
preservation of evidence in any future criminal investigation and/or
prosecution."

The decision to treat rape kits as purely evidentiary, ignoring
the very real medical and psychological benefits to the victim, is
reprehensibly primitive thinking. Making sure that those legislative
changes happen as planned would be a long overdue step out of the
primal ooze that has slimed our military in the eyes of our citizens
and the world.

Speaking to Palin's decision not to pay for rape kits, the
former governor of Alaska, Tony Knowles, was quoted in Palin's
hometown paper, the Frontiersman, as saying, "We would never bill the
victim of a burglary for fingerprinting and photographing the crime
scene, or for the cost of gathering other evidence. Nor should we
bill rape victims just because the crime scene happens to be their bodies."

When Barack Obama decides who he will appoint to head the
Department of Veterans Affairs in his administration, he should
consider appointing someone who also understands how important it is
that women's bodies, souls, dignity and health be taken seriously.
Tammy Duckworth, who is reported to be at the top of his list,
certainly has had personal experience with a health care delivery
system she has called "a little bit arcane."

Duckworth is now director of the Illinois Department of Veterans
Affairs, but in 2004, she was a Blackhawk helicopter pilot in Iraq
and lost both of her legs in a crash. She describes the care she
received at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as "excellent," but adds,
"the comfort package I received contained men's Jockey shorts, and
the local VA hospital carried Viagra but not my birth control."

There are currently about 1.7 million female veterans in the
United States, and the Department of Defense estimates that there are
about 200,000 women, 15 percent of the military, on active duty.
Thirty-nine percent of those women return from Iraq or Afghanistan
with mental health issues, and, for more than a third who seek VA
health care, the precipitating trauma was a sexual assault.

Every VA center now screens both men and women for sexual
trauma. That is an improvement. Still, Duckworth says, "I don't think
the VA mental health care system is ready for (female veterans)." It
would be encouraging to see a VA director who has some understanding
of how important that is to fix.
--

* The overwhelming indictment of the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan - and the heartbreaking devastation they have wrought on
the souls of young American soldiers - are now the subject of an
invaluable book edited by Aaron Glantz and issued by Haymarket Books.

Penny Coleman is the widow of a Vietnam veteran who took his own
life after coming home. Her latest book, "Flashback: Posttraumatic
Stress Disorder, Suicide and the Lessons of War," was released on
Memorial Day 2006. Her Web site is Flashback.

.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

War deployments make kids more aggressive

[2 articles]

Study: War deployments make kids more aggressive

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jBFSvToG49DP7oKZWpM24yyHY0PAD947MF880

By CARLA K. JOHNSON
Nov 3, 2008

CHICAGO (AP) ­ Preschoolers with a parent away at war were more
likely to show aggression than other young children in military
families, according to the first published research on how the very
young react to wartime deployment.

Hitting, biting and hyperactivity ­ "the behaviors parents really
notice" ­ were more frequent when a parent was deployed, said lead
author Dr. Molinda Chartrand, an active duty pediatrician in the U.S.
Air Force.

The study, which was small and included fewer than 200 children, adds
to previous evidence of the stress that deployment puts on families.
Last year, a study of almost 1,800 Army families worldwide found that
reports of child abuse and neglect were 42 percent higher during
times when the soldier-parent was deployed.

This time, researchers looked at families living on a large Marine
base in 2007. (The base wasn't identified in the study.) Children, 3
to 5 years old, with a deployed parent scored an average of five
points higher for behavior problems on two questionnaires widely used
in child psychology than did the children whose Marine-parents
weren't deployed.

About 1 in 5 of the older preschoolers with a parent at war displayed
troubling emotional or behavioral signs.

Since the war began in Afghanistan seven years ago and Iraq more than
five years ago, "this is the first time any data have been published
on these little kids," said Chartrand, who conducted the study while
at Boston University School of Medicine.

The researchers surveyed parents and child care providers of 169
preschool-age children. Parents, mostly mothers, answered questions
on their children's behavior and emotional state. Parents also
completed questionnaires on their own stress and depression.

The age of the children made a big difference in the study, which
appears in November's Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.

While older preschoolers had trouble, deployment had the opposite
effect on children younger than 3, yielding fewer behavior problems
as rated by parents and caregivers.

The researchers speculated that, with fathers away, the younger
children had more time to bond with their mothers, a benefit for that
age group. But preschoolers 3 and older may be more negatively
affected by their fathers' absence.

In a few families, it was the mother who was away at war, but for
most (92 percent), it was the father. The Marine-fathers had been
away an average of about four months when the mothers and day care
providers were surveyed.

Children with existing conditions such as autism and attention
deficit disorder were excluded from the study, and the researchers
took into account the at-home parent's depression and stress.

That made the results especially notable to Michelle Kelley, a
psychology professor at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Va., who
was not involved in the new study but has done similar research with
older children in military families.

"You're pulling out the mom's depressive symptoms and her stress so
the difference in the kids is above and independent of that," Kelley
said. "If these kids are having difficulty, it's pretty likely that
other kids are having difficulty as well."

Col. Richard Ricciardi of Walter Reed Army Medical Center called the
study important, while noting that the small number of families means
no sweeping conclusions can be made. The findings are in line with
unpublished military research he's reviewed and what's known about
child development, he said.

He called for further research on preschoolers in military families.
"We need to do more of this," he said.

During the past year, the Marine Corps has increased its funding of
programs to help families, said Kimberly Holmes, who directs a family
program at Camp Lejeune, N.C.

The Marines are relying less on volunteers, instead hiring staff to
give more support to families. Four new child care centers are
planned at the base, which will provide care to an additional 1,200
preschoolers.

Deborah Gibbs of the nonprofit RTI International in Research Triangle
Park, N.C., who conducted last year's study of deployment and child
abuse, has seen changes in the Army in the past year. She said Army
doctors have been ordered to be more alert to problems if a parent is
away at war.

Most military families are resilient, she said.

"They deal with a lot of separation and uprooting as a matter of course."
--

On the Net:
Archives: http://www.archpediatrics.com

--------

Off to War

http://www.schoollibraryjournal.com/article/CA6611997.html

By Debra Lau Whelan -- School Library Journal
11/5/2008

In Deborah Ellis's Off to War: Voices of Soldiers' Children
(Groundwood, 2008), the kids of American and Canadian soldiers talk
openly about what it's like to have a mom or dad­and in some cases
both­deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Ellis's follow-up book Voices
of War (Groundwood), which contains interviews with Iraqi children
now living in Jordan as refugees, is due out in January.

What struck you most about the kids you interviewed?
A lot of the kids I talked to seemed really, really lonely. Things
had changed with their parent and nobody would talk to them about
what was going on. And they didn't want to bring it up just in case
it made their parent more sad. Sometimes the parent would come back
really angry and uptight and not want to spend any time with their
kids any more. So they wouldn't see this parent for 16 to18 months,
and then the parent would come back, and they still wouldn't have
their parent. Other parents came back changed for the better. They
used to be crabby and nitpicky, and they came back so grateful to be
with their families, and little things didn't bother them any more.

Was there a common thread in the stories you heard?
It certainly differed between the full-time army and the reserves.
The kids from the National Guard families were really thrown for a
loop. They hadn't expected their parent to go to war. It wasn't on
their radar. A lot of them just didn't know how to deal with it. And
a lot of the families around them didn't know how to deal with it.
Often, they would be the only kid in their school or even the only
kid in their town going through that experience, and they didn't have
anybody else to talk to. Kids with parents in the military fulltime
and whose parents came home­they seemed fine. But when talking to
them, they would start to cry remembering the time that they'd last
seen their parents.

Did age play any role in how well they handled the separation?
The older kids took on a lot more of the burden for caring for the
family, but they all kind of missed their parent really, really deeply.

Were any of these kids, their friends, or even parents antiwar?
The military is not a monolithic organization. It's full of a wide
variety of people with a wide variety of opinions and backgrounds.
Some of the kids I interviewed, their parents were very active in the
antiwar movement, Veterans Against the War and so on. Some of the
kids had been at antiwar protests and had spoken at rallies, and of
course, some of the kids approached it from a very different
perspective, believing that the protesters were in fact traitors to
the country. So there were both of those opinions. Some kids talked
about classmates who knew they were military kids, and some said kids
assumed that if their parent was in the military that they just
wanted to go and kill people. They didn't have a realistic sense of
what was going on over there or what the military was all about.

How did you find the roughly 20 kids in your book?
In Canada, I approached the military, military organizations, and
groups that work with military kids. Then to get to Fort Bragg (in
North Carolina), I had to get permission from the army public
relations office in New York City. I interviewed probably three times
as many kids who've actually ended up in the book.

Did substance abuse become a problem?
If I interviewed kids alone without a parent present, they would tell
me things about alcohol abuse and things like that relating to their
parents. But I couldn't put that into the interview because that
would be harmful to them down the road. They also told me stuff like
the escalation of tensions and the effects of that.

How can school librarians help these kids?
The kids were really curious about where their parent was. And some
schools took the approach of "Let's just not talk about Afghanistan.
Let's make it a place where kids don't have to deal with it." And
other communities took the approach of "Let's talk about it a lot.
Let's get to know the people over there." And they did displays and
all sorts of things. I found that the kids were really hungry for
information, so libraries can put on displays about Iraq, Iraqi
culture, society, and history, as well as Afghanistan.

What audience does your book target?
I was initially only targeting myself because I wanted to find out
how these kids were managing. I think the publisher had in mind that
it could be for military kids to read and glean through for
information about how they could manage to get through what they're
going through. Hopefully, the adults who work with these kids can
read it and get a sense of how they can be more useful when it comes
to what these kids are experiencing. And for kids who are not part of
that world, it gives an interesting perspective of a different way to
look at what's going on when they see it in the news.

Did any of the interviews leave a lasting impression?
The thing that made me saddest about doing this book is I would ask
the kids if they could imagine a world without war, and I'd say 95
percent of them hadn't even thought of it. They just assumed that war
is a natural part of our lives. It hadn't even really entered their
minds that there could be an alternative. And while this isn't a
scientific sample by any means, if there is any truth at all to this
theory that these kids haven't had their imagination opened up enough
to be able to think about a world without war, then we adults have a
lot of work to do in order to make that seem to them like a
possibility that they could start to work on.

.

Army discharges soldier for beating Jewish trainee

Army discharges soldier for beating Jewish trainee

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gNWRiNe9MMsgWg92Uqx-FWRUq3HAD947IEB80

By RUSS BYNUM
Nov 3, 2008

SAVANNAH, Ga. (AP) ­ The Army has kicked out a soldier for beating a
Jewish trainee who complained about religious harassment in their
basic training unit, a Fort Benning spokesman said Monday.

Citing federal privacy laws, the Army had previously refused to
discuss how it punished the attacker of Pvt. Michael Handman, 20, of
Atlanta, other than to say the case had been handled as an
administrative matter rather than as a crime.

That changed after the southeast director of the Anti-Defamation
League met Fort Benning officials Friday. Col. Charles Durr, chief of
staff at Fort Benning, told the ADL's Bill Nigut the assailant had
been discharged.

"The soldier that was punished for the assault on Pvt. Handman has
been processed for discharge from the Army," Fort Benning spokesman
Bob Purtiman confirmed Monday.

The Army says Handman was beaten Sept. 24 by a fellow trainee in a
laundry room near his barracks. Handman was treated at an Army
hospital for a concussion and bruising to his face. He has since been
transferred to another basic training unit at Fort Benning in Columbus.

Four days before the attack, Handman was interviewed by commanders of
his basic training unit about complaints he'd made in letters to his
parents that he had been harassed by two drill sergeants because he's Jewish.

The Army later acknowledged one drill sergeant had ordered Handman to
remove his yarmulke, which he wore with his uniform, as he ate in a
dining hall. Another drill sergeant had called him "Juden" ­ the
German word for Jews.

Purtiman said investigators concluded the assault on Handman was not
motivated by bigotry, but he would not say what prompted it. He also
would not release the name of Handman's attacker, citing the federal
Privacy Act.

Jonathan Handman, the Jewish soldier's father, said Monday the Army
should have court-martialed the trainee who attacked his son.

"If this was civilian life, he would've been arrested under a hate
crime," he said. "Why should it be any different under the military?"

Military law gives commanders the option of pursuing criminal charges
in a court-martial or handling accusations of misconduct
administratively, basically treating them as personnel matters.

Purtiman said Army lawyers told Fort Benning commanders they could
announce that Handman's attacker had been discharged once the accused
soldier had left the Army post. He said the soldier's last day at
Fort Benning was Friday, when Nigut met with officials there.

Nigut said he still believes Handman's harassment by drill sergeants
likely singled him out as a target for further abuse by fellow
trainees. But he said he's pleased overall with the Army's resolution
of the case.

"After listening to the Army's investigators and hearing what they
learned, the fact that this trainee is no longer in the Army is a
good thing," Nigut said. "I think the Army took ADL's concerns seriously."

.

The Dangerous Consequences of Recruiting Nazis to Serve in Iraq

The Dangerous Consequences of Recruiting Nazis to Serve in Iraq

http://rinf.com/alt-news/breaking-news/the-dangerous-consequences-of-recruiting-nazis-to-serve-in-iraq/4789/

Saturday, November 1st, 2008

The U.S. military appears to be teaching a skinhead with genocide on
his mind how to become a tactical bomb maker.

The racist skinhead logged on with exciting news: He'd just enlisted
in the United States Army.

"Sieg Heil, I will do us proud," he wrote. It was a June 3 post to
AryanWear Forum 14, a neo-Nazi online forum to which "Sobibor's SS,"
who identified himself as a skinhead living in Plantersville, Ala.,
had belonged since early 2004. (Sobibor was a Nazi death camp in
Poland during World War II).

About a month after he announced his enlistment, Sobibor's SS bragged
in another post to Forum 14 that he'd specifically requested and been
assigned to MOS, or Military Occupational Specialty, 98D. MOS98D
soldiers are in high demand right now. That's because they're
specially trained in disarming Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs)
like the infamous roadside bombs that are killing and maiming so many
U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Presumably, a part of learning
how to disarm an IED is learning how to make one.

"I have my own reasons for wanting this training but in fear of the
government tracing me and me loosing [sic] my clearance I can't share
them here," Sobibor's SS informed his fellow neo-Nazis.

One of his earlier posts indicated his reasons serve a darker purpose
than defending America: "Once all the Jews are gone the world will
start fixing itself."

Sobibor's SS included enough biographical details in his various
posts to Forum 14 over the years, including that he's a single father
from the small town in southern Alabama, that a military investigator
with access to enlistment records for recent months should have
little trouble discerning whether the Army is actually teaching a
skinhead with genocide on his mind how to be a tactical bomb maker.

But there's little reason to expect that will happen.

Two years ago, the Intelligence Report revealed that alarming numbers
of neo-Nazi skinheads and other white supremacist extremists were
taking advantage of lowered armed services recruiting standards and
lax enforcement of anti-extremist military regulations by
infiltrating the U.S. armed forces in order to receive combat
training and gain access to weapons and explosives.

Forty members of Congress urged then-Secretary of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld to launch a full-scale investigation and implement a
zero-tolerance policy toward white supremacists in the military.
"Military extremists present an elevated threat to both their fellow
service members and the public," U.S. Senator Richard Shelby, an
Alabama Republican, wrote in a separate open letter to Rumsfeld. "We
witnessed with Timothy McVeigh that today's racist extremist may
become tomorrow's domestic terrorist."

But neither Rumsfeld nor his successor, Robert Gates, enacted any
sort of systemic investigation or crackdown. Military and Defense
Department officials seem to have made no sustained effort to prevent
active white supremacists from joining the armed forces, or to weed
out those already in uniform.

Furthermore, new evidence is emerging that not only supports the
Intelligence Report's findings, but also indicates the problem may
have worsened since the summer of 2006, as enlistment rates continued
to plummet, and the military accepted an ever-lower quality of
soldier in a time of unpopular war.

First of all, a new FBI report (PDF) confirms that white supremacist
leaders are making a concerted effort to recruit active-duty soldiers
and recent combat veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
According to the unclassified FBI Intelligence Assessment, "White
Supremacist Recruitment of Military Personnel Since 9/11," which was
released to law enforcement agencies nationwide: "Sensitive and
reliable source reporting indicates supremacist leaders are
encouraging followers who lack documented histories of neo-Nazi
activity and overt racist insignia such as tattoos to infiltrate the
military as 'ghost skins,' in order to recruit and receive training
for the benefit of the extremist movement."

The FBI report details more than a dozen investigative findings and
criminal cases involving Iraq and Afghanistan veterans as well as
active-duty personnel engaging in extremist activity in recent years.
For example, in September 2006, the leader of the Celtic Knights, a
central Texas splinter faction of the Hammerskins, a national racist
skinhead organization, planned to obtain firearms and explosives from
an active duty Army soldier in Fort Hood, Texas. That soldier, who
served in Iraq in 2006 and 2007, was a member of the National
Alliance, a neo-Nazi group.

"Looking ahead, current and former military personnel belonging to
white supremacist extremist organizations who experience frustration
at the inability of these organizations to achieve their goals may
choose to found new, more operationally minded and operationally
capable groups," the report concludes. "The military training
veterans bring to the movement and their potential to pass this
training on to others can increase the ability of lone offenders to
carry out violence from the movement's fringes."

Currently, 46 members of the white supremacist social networking
website Newsaxon.com identity themselves as active-duty military
personnel. Six of these individuals are members of "White Military
Men," a New Saxon sub-group.

Earlier this year, the founder of White Military Men identified
himself in his New Saxon account as "Lance Corporal Burton" of the
2nd Battalion Fox Company Pit 2097, from Florida, according to a
master's thesis by graduate student Matthew Kennard. Under his "About
Me" section, Burton writes: "Love to shoot my M16A2 service rifle
effectively at the Hachies (Iraqis)," and, "Love to watch things blow
up (Hachies House)."

As part of his thesis research, Kennard, at the time a student at
Columbia University's Toni Stabile Center for Investigative
Journalism, also monitored claims of active-duty military service
earlier this year on the neo-Nazi online forum Blood and Honour,
where "88Soldier88 posted this message on Feb. 18: "I am in the ARMY
right now. I work in the Detainee Holding Area [in Iraq]. I am in
this until 2013. I am in the infantry but want to go to SF [Special
Forces]. Hopefully the training will prepare me for what I hope is to come."

One of the Blood and Honour members claiming to be an active-duty
soldier taking part in combat operations in Iraq identified himself
to Kennard as Jacob Berg. He did not disclose his rank or branch of
service. "There are actually a lot more 'skinheads,' 'nazis,' white
supremacists now [in the military] than there has been in a long
time," Berg wrote in an E-mail exchange with Kennard. "Us racists are
actually getting into the military a lot now because if we don't
every one who already is [in the military] will take pity on killing
sand niggers. Yes I have killed women, yes I have killed children and
yes I have killed older people. But the biggest reason I'm so proud
of my kills is because by killing a brown many white people will live
to see a new dawn."

The Army is currently investigating war crimes allegations leveled
against Iraq combat veteran and active-duty Army soldier Kenneth
Eastridge, 24, who is facing trial for the December 2007 murder of a
fellow serviceman. After Eastridge was arrested for that killing,
National Public Radio publicized his MySpace page, which showed
Eastridge displaying a tattoo of SS lightning bolts, a common
neo-Nazi insignia.

Another member of Eastridge's company recently told Army
investigators that Eastridge used a stolen AK-47 to fire
indiscriminately at Iraqi civilians from his moving Humvee on the
streets of Baghdad. "The military is to some extent desperate to get
people to fight, soldiers who are not fit, mentally and physically
sick, but they continue to send them," Eastridge's attorney told
Kennard. "Having a tattoo was the least [Eastridge's] concerns."

As part of the research for his thesis, "The New Nazi Army: How the
U.S. military is allowing the far right to join its ranks," Kennard
used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain from the Army's
Criminal Investigative Division investigative reports concerning
white supremacist activity in 2006 and 2007. They show that Army
commanders repeatedly terminated investigations of suspected
extremist activity in the military despite strong evidence it was
occurring. This evidence was often provided by regional Joint
Terrorism Task Forces, which are made up of FBI and state and local
law enforcement officials.

For example, one CID report details a 2006 investigation of a
suspected member of the Hammerskins, a multi-state racist skinhead
gang, who was stationed at Fort Hood, a large Army base in central
Texas. According to the report, there was "probable cause" to believe
that the soldier "had participated in a white extremist meeting and
also provided a military technical manual 31-210, Improvised
Munitions Handbook, to the leader of a white extremist group in order
to assist in the planning and execution of future attacks on various targets."

The report shows that agents only interviewed the subject once, in
November 2006, before Fort Hood higher-ups called off the
investigation that December.

Another report, also from 2006, covers an investigation of another
Fort Hood soldier who was posting messages on Stormfront.org, a major
white supremacist website. One CID investigator expresses his
frustration at the muddled process for dealing with extremists. "We
need to discuss the review process," he writes. "I'm not doing my job
here. Needs to get fixed."

A third CID report, regarding a 2007 investigation, notes the
termination of an investigation of a soldier at Fort Richardson,
Alaska, who was reportedly the leader and chief recruiter for the
Alaska Front, a white supremacist group. According to the report, the
investigation was halted because the solider was "mobilized to Camp
Shelby, MS in preparation for deployment to Iraq."

.

JROTC: The Untold Story

JROTC: The Untold Story

http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=6228

by Marc Norton
Oct. 28‚ 2008

"Without JROTC, I would not be where I am today: a Staff Sergeant in
the United States Army." So writes Jason, a former JROTC cadet, in a
recent Facebook post on the Keep JROTC Alive in San Francisco site.
"As a young teenager," he continues, "the JROTC program helped me
develop discipline, leadership skills, and values which I continue to
use today. So let's keep the JROTC program alive!"

The Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps (JROTC) was created 90
years ago, at the height of the hysteria of World War I, when
President Woodrow Wilson needed troops for the "war to end all wars."
The program was reauthorized in 1964 by President Lyndon Johnson, who
needed troops for yet another doomed military adventure, this time in
the jungles of Vietnam. Today, under the reign of yet another wartime
President, JROTC's operational budget has more than doubled.

JROTC was, is, and always will be, a military recruitment program.
The "discipline, leadership skills, and values" that Jason and other
JROTC advocates tirelessly praise are, for many, nothing more than a
come-on for recruitment.

"WHAT ABOUT THE STUDENTS WHO WANT WAR?"

It is October, 2002. Hundreds of thousands have died in Iraq, mostly
children, as a result of the US-backed sanctions campaign against
that country. The "shock and awe" of the invasion and occupation is
still a few months away, although everybody knows it is coming.

A teacher at Washington High School here in San Francisco watches as
a school security guard enters her classroom, radio in hand. The
teacher and her students hear a voice come over that radio, ordering
the guard to send the teacher to the Principal's office. The security
guard relays the order. The guard takes charge of the class, and the
teacher heads to the office.

The Principal is waiting for her. He has received a report from one
of the school's JROTC instructors that certain teachers had allegedly
encouraged students to go to an upcoming peace march.

The Principal does not tell the teacher that he got her name from the
JROTC instructor. He does tell her that he has received a report that
she is giving extra credit to students who attend the peace march.
The teacher denies this accusation, because it is not true. She does
acknowledge that there is a poster about the march in her classroom,
and that she has informed her students about it.

The Principal asks, "What about the students who want war?"

At least two other teachers at Washington High are summoned to the
Principal's office for a similar chat. One of them eventually learns
that they had all been fingered by the JROTC instructor.

On October 26, a crowd of 50,000 demonstrates in San Francisco
against the coming war. More than 100,000 demonstrate in Washington,
D.C., the largest antiwar demonstration in that city since the
Vietnam war. In March, the invasion begins. Hundreds of thousands
more die, and are still dying.

Every school day since those three Washington High teachers were
summoned to the Principal's office, hundreds of JROTC cadets, many as
young as 14 or 15, have been instructed for credit in the art of
military discipline and leadership by retired military officers at
seven different high schools in San Francisco.

What Principal has asked their JROTC instructors about the hundreds
of thousands who have been killed or wounded, Americans and Iraqis
alike, in the illegal and immoral war in Iraq?

The Principal at Washington High has since moved on. He is now the
Principal at Lowell, the district's premier academic high school,
which hosts one of the largest JROTC contingents in the City. The
JROTC instructor who fingered those Washington High teachers has also
moved on. He is no longer a JROTC instructor, although he does show
up at the school occasionally as a substitute teacher.

And, of course, the war goes on and on and on.

"U BETTER F*****N WATCH UR PIMPLE ASS BAK."

It is November 2006. The War in Iraq is now in its fourth year.

"Hey you stupid hatin azz bitch!!! Better watch ur fkn bk ya dumbazz whore!"

That was just one of the threatening MySpace messages directed at
Mara Kubrin, a senior at Lowell High School. The day before receiving
this threat, Mara had presented a petition to the School Board
opposing JROTC, signed by over 800 students.

The next morning her picture appeared in the online edition of the
Chronicle, and the flood of threats began: "God you know how many
people you have made cry & how many people hate you! & wanna Beat you
up & Slap the S**t out of you!!!!"

A former JROTC cadet, one Daniel Chin, drafted a bulletin with Mara's
picture, calling her a "traitor," identifying her as a student at
Lowell, and claiming that "by viewing this... [you agree] to release
said author from all damages resulting from... any physical or mental
damages resulting from violence" as a result of the bulletin.

"Man those pic bulletins of you are really funny. I mean HAHAH!
funny. Like LOL funny. BITCH."

Until Daniel Chin's role in this episode was revealed, he had been
one of the San Francisco JROTC's spokesmen, supposedly a prime
example of the "leadership training" JROTC provides.

"DAMN HOE U BETTER LISTEN UP... I FEEL SORRY 4 UR MOTHER 4 GIVEN
BIRTH 2 YA UGLE ASS... U BETTER F*****N WATCH UR PIMPLE ASS BAK
BEFORE PPL GO JUMPIN UR ASS UP SHIET HA..."

Despite articles about this campaign of intimidation in BeyondChron
and the Bay Area Reporter, not a word of any of this has appeared in
the mainstream press, which continues to sing the praises about
JROTC's "leadership training."

"WE'RE WATCHING VERY CLOSELY."

It is October 1, 2008. The War in Iraq is now in its sixth year. It
has gone on longer than World War II.

An Associated Press national report quotes a certain Curtis Gilroy,
an official in the Defense Department's office for personnel and
military readiness: "We're watching the San Francisco situation very closely."

The "situation" that the Pentagon is watching is the vote on
Proposition V. Prop V asks the people of San Francisco to declare
themselves in favor of keeping JROTC in our schools.

In 2005, nearly 60% of San Francisco voters declared that they wanted
to give the boot to military recruiters in our schools.

In 2006, a majority of the San Francisco School Board voted to phase
out and replace JROTC, one of the Pentagon's favorite military
recruitment programs.

Now in 2008, the Pentagon and its allies want San Franciscans to
reverse course, and declare themselves in favor of JROTC and military
recruitment programs in our schools.

One would think this would be a hard sell. But the Pentagon doesn't
give up easily. They fear that San Francisco could be the spark that
sets off a prairie fire of anti-JROTC campaigns around the country --
a country very weary of the endless wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

And the Pentagon, as everybody knows, has very deep pockets, and
plenty of experience in running disinformation programs.

"VEGGIES OF CONTENTION"

It is October 3, 2008. The Chronicle publishes a Yes on V opinion
piece, claiming that "less than 5%" of JROTC cadets "enter the
military." The authors cite no source for this preposterous
statistic. They add: "The characterization of JROTC as mainly a
recruitment tool is completely false."

No less than former Defense Secretary William Cohen said "JROTC is
one of the best recruiting devices we could have." Pentagon officials
openly brag that 40-50% of JROTC cadets end up in the military.

Yours truly submits a Letter to the Editor the next day, which reads, in part:

"When I asked Jill Wynns, the school board's biggest apologist for
the Pentagon, where she got similar ridiculously-low recruitment
numbers, she told me they came from the school district. When I asked
her for the evidence, she clammed up.

"The San Francisco Business Times used similar numbers in an article
not long ago. When I challenged them, they told me, like Wynns, that
their numbers came from a school district report, but that they were
'unable to turn up a copy.'

"I filed a public records request with the school district asking for
any information they have about the JROTC recruitment rates. Their
unequivocal answer is that they have no such data.

"Only the Pentagon knows how many JROTC cadets end up in the
military, either immediately after graduation, or a few years down
the road. If you believe the Pentagon when they tell you only 5% of
San Francisco JROTC cadets end up in the military, I have a bridge to
sell you."

The Chronicle, of course, never ran my letter.

They did, however, run a letter a couple of days later titled
"Veggies of contention," about a report that the school district is
buying fruits and vegetables for school lunches from the Pentagon,
alleging hypocrisy on the part of the district for trying to boot out
JROTC while feeding the students Pentagon produce.

"SOMETIMES WE GET STUDENTS WHO HAVEN'T ASKED TO BE IN THE PROGRAM."

It is July 2008. The San Francisco "Ballot Simplification Committee"
is meeting to discuss and decide how Proposition V will be described
in the voter's ballot handbook. Republican operative Chris Bowman is
in charge of the presentation for "Yes on V."

The committee is debating whether or not to state in the handbook
that JROTC is "voluntary." This goes to the heart of the campaign for
Prop V, whose proponents argue that JROTC is a merely a "choice" that
shouldn't be denied 14 and 15-year-old high school freshmen and sophomores.

Representing "No on V," I argue that JROTC is not entirely
"voluntary." I cite a survey of 848 JROTC cadets from the previous
school year, in which 15.6% of the students stated that they were
"placed in the program without my consent." The program was clearly
not voluntary for those students.

I also point out that there have been recent reports that immigrant
youth at Mission High have been told that they have to take JROTC to graduate.

One of the members of the committee addresses Gerry Paratore, a JROTC
instructor at Balboa High. He is asked to comment. He slowly rises.
"Sometimes," he says, "we get students who haven't asked to be in the program."

"What do you do about these students?" asks the committee member.

Paratore stands silent for a quite a while, apparently not sure how
to answer this question.

"I talk to them," he finally says.

The committee decides to strike the word "voluntary" from the handbook.

THE GIRL'S DRILL TEAM

It is September 2008. At Balboa High, the school where JROTC
instructor Paratore works, one entering 9th grader was recruited at
the beginning of this year into the "girl's drill team." She didn't
learn until later that it was a JROTC class.

When she figured it out, she insisted on getting out. Even with JROTC
under a public microscope in the middle of the Prop V campaign, there
was some stalling by the administrators, but she finally succeeded.
It probably didn't hurt that she is related to one of the members of
the School Board.

The district has promised to investigate whether or not other
students in the "girl's drill team" really want to be part of JROTC.

BALBOA HAZING

Go back to 1994.

A controversy erupts when it is reported that three JROTC cadets are
sent through "ranks" four times, "a ritual punishment in which JROTC
cadets are punched repeatedly on the upper arms and shoulders as they
walk between a gauntlet of drill team members," according to a
statement by the school board at the time. In this particular
instance, one of the cadets was assaulted by the student commander
after being sent through ranks, leaving him with a broken eardrum.

The School Board investigation further revealed that "for at least
the last five years, ranks was a common means of student-to-student
punishment in the JROTC program at Balboa."

Partly as a result of this revelation, a resolution to remove JROTC
from the schools was introduced before the school board in 1995. The
resolution failed on a 4-3 vote.

Such a resolution isn't considered again for eleven long years.

"THE PROGRAM IS DYING."

It is now September 2008. This is supposed to be the last year for
JROTC in San Francisco.

This is also the first school year that JROTC cadets will not be
getting physical education (PE) credit.

State law changed the year before, beefing up requirements for PE
teachers. JROTC instructors do not even come close to qualifying, and
neither does the JROTC curriculum.

When the school district got a letter late last year from the
respected public interest law firm, Public Advocates, suggesting that
they would sue the district if they continued to give PE credit to
JROTC cadets, the district made the only appropriate decision, and
withdrew PE credit.

The number of students in JROTC has dropped precipitously, from about
1,050 the year before to 503.

The biggest number of JROTC cadets has always been entering freshmen
and sophomores, looking to get out of taking PE classes for the two
years that are required by state law.

This year, without PE credit, the number of freshmen JROTC cadets
dropped by approximately 80%.

There are three freshmen cadets at Lincoln. There are five freshmen
at Mission. There are four at Burton. There is now a total of 74
freshmen JROTC cadets district-wide, compared to nearly 400 last
year. There are about half as many sophomores this year as there were
last year.

Without the inducement of PE credit, "the program is dying," says one
teacher who has been close to the program for many years.

FLEET WEEK

It is October 12, 2008. It's Fleet Week. The Blue Angels are
screaming through the sky in their annual display of America's military might.

The Lowell JROTC color guard struts its stuff at the Fleet Week
opening festivities, displaying for all the world to see that they
are part of America's military machine as well.

A good friend spends the day at the wharf with his lady friend,
watching the aerial show. He is from out-of-town, and knows nothing
about the ballot battle in San Francisco over JROTC. But he stops by
on his way home, and tells me about all the kids he saw, of all ages,
some apparently even of elementary school age, wearing camouflage,
playing soldier, many of them in organized groups parading around in formation.

It will soon be November 2008. America, isn't time to be all you can be?

The No on Prop V website is www.NoMilitaryRecruitmentInOurSchools.org.

.

Kingston schools decision lauded

Kingston schools decision lauded

http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081029/NEWS/810290356

School board puts limits on military recruiting

By Meghan E. Murphy
Times Herald-Record
October 29, 2008

KINGSTON ­ A decision to limit military recruitment in Kingston
schools is being lauded by a civil liberties group and accepted by
military recruiters.

Last week, the Kingston school board approved a policy allowing
recruiters in the guidance office only when they have an appointment
with a student. In the past, the high school allowed recruiters to
set up tables in the cafeteria. "I don't like the idea of them
setting up a booth in the lunch room. I wouldn't have a problem with
it if colleges could, too," said school board member Chris Farrell.

The New York Civil Liberties Union said the state should take the
same approach as Kingston and enact a standard policy, using public
input, for how schools deal with military recruitment. The No Child
Left Behind Act requires that schools allow recruiters the same
access as colleges and share student information with the military
unless parents complete opt-out forms. But the legislation doesn't
cover how schools should distribute forms or what access recruiters
should have, said NYCLU organizer Erica Braudy. The organization is
currently drafting a model policy.

The NYCLU also is battling a New York City Department of Education
decision to centralize the process for giving recruiters student
contact information. The city's policy changed without public input
and gives preferential treatment to recruiters over colleges, which
have to request information from individual schools, Braudy said. The
organization is also advocating for greater education efforts and
distribution of opt-out forms.

In Kingston and Newburgh schools, opt-out forms are sent to parents
at the beginning of the school year. Newburgh Free Academy Principal
Peter Copeletti said he's seen more parents opting out since the war
in Iraq began. The school does allow recruiters in the cafeteria but
not in classrooms, he said.

Recruiters will comply with the Kingston board decision, said Andy
Entwistle, spokesman for the Albany recruiting battalion, which
includes the Hudson Valley. He said the decision is legal and
shouldn't impact the military's ability to recruit students from
Kingston High School.
--

mmurphy@th-record.com

.

Vandals Attack Lacey Military Recruiting Office

Vandals Attack Lacey Military Recruiting Office

http://www.kirotv.com/news/17848843/detail.html

October 30, 2008

LACEY, Wash. -- A military recruiting office was vandalized with
anti-war sentiments in the Hawks Prairie area of Lacey.

Lacey police said an officer was driving by the office at 1316 Galaxy
Drive at about midnight Wednesday when he noticed some damage.

Vandals tossed a large cinder block through the office window and "no
war" and anarchy symbols were spray-painted on the building and a
recruiting van that was parked nearby.

The vandals also left a flyer comparing the military recruiters to
Nazi Germany on the door of the recruitment center.

"You can be for the war or against the war, vandalizing isn't going
to solve anything," said Bre Orr of Lacey.

The vandalism comes nine days after vandals struck the Thurston
County democratic headquarters and left behind anarchist symbols and
several broken windows.

A representative from the Army said this is the fifth time a
recruiting center has been targeted by vandals in the past three
months. Vandals have hit offices in Olympia, Spanaway and Tacoma.

"We're going to be looking to determine whether or not these are
connected cases," Lt. Jim Mack of the Lacey Police Department said.

.

The Counter Recruiter

The Counter Recruiter

http://www.myfoxwghp.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=7774613&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.2.1

02 Nov 2008
By CHAD TUCKER
FOX8 News

WILKES COUNTY, N.C. (WGHP) -- About once a month, Sally Ferrell and
others quietly protest on the streets of North Wilkesboro. The group
opposes the war in Iraq, but recently, Ferrell has found herself in
the middle of a battle with the Wilkes County Schools.

Ferrell says she wants to provide high school students with options
to serve the U.S. apart from the military.

"We didn't want to set up a conflict situation or have any
controversy," she explains. "We just wanted to balance what they were
hearing from recruiters."

Ferrell claims the recruiters are aggressive in order to meet quotas
and target rural students where opportunities after graduation are limited.

A similar situation is playing out in schools across the country.
Anti-war groups are seeking to provide students with alternatives to
joining the military. Called counter recruiters, they want the same
access to students that military recruiters get -- often setting up
tables in cafeterias, hallways and guidance offices.

Wilkes County Schools Superintendent Dr. Stephen Laws initially
welcomed Ferrell into the high school.

"My assumption was that it was about Peace Corps, Americorps and
other opportunities for my kids. It ended up being more of a negative
thing," he said.

The pamphlets do provide information on those organizations, but
principals were troubled by a cartoon character, Sgt. Abe, the Honest
Recruiter.

In the pamphlet, Sgt. Abe explains that veterans suffer long-term
physical and psychological damage, women in the military face a high
risk of sexual harrassment, and militaries families have higher rates
of domestic abuse and divorce.

The brochure also shows the image of a flag-draped coffin, stating
that dozens of U.S. soldiers are being killed every month. It ends
with "Think hard before you sign. Your life could be at stake."

Ferrell says all the information in the pamphlets is factual and
would likely not be mentioned by a recruiter.

She said 450 students picked up the pamphlets the few times she was
allowed in the school.

"There was little opposition except for the superintendent for the
school board. Teachers and guidance counselors were for it and what
we do get to go, the students were enthusiastic and glad to have the
information," she said.

Laws and the school board ultimately decided Ferrell was no longer
allowed inside the county's high schools. The told her she was
welcome back if she offered opportunities.

Ferrell, for her part, said that's what she was doing.

"I don't ever tell students not to join the military," she said.

Now, the ACLU is looking at legal action to help get Ferrell back in
the schools.

.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

RIT Antiwar protests recruiters

RIT Antiwar protests recruiters

http://socialistworker.org/2008/10/29/RIT-protests-recruiters

By Adriano Contreras, Rochester Institute of Technology Antiwar
October 29, 2008

ROCHESTER, N.Y.--Campus Antiwar Network activists at the Rochester
Institute of Technology (RIT Antiwar) organized a counter-recruitment
action on October 24 that resulted in zero recruitment and led to
Marine recruiters leaving the Student Alumni Union 30 minutes ahead
of schedule.

After organizing two to three minor actions against recruitment and
war profiteers within the last two months, RIT Antiwar members felt
confident that they could take on the recruiters, and when they heard
the military was coming to campus, the group voted unanimously to
challenge their recruitment efforts.

Activists leafleted on Thursday morning to get students out to
participate in the Friday action. A majority of people was
supportive, and some expressed an interest in participating. On
Friday morning before recruiters arrived, protesters gathered their
literature and signs, and held a brief discussion on why
counter-recruitment organizing is so important.

The action itself was a huge success. Every member of the chapter
turned out, as well as friends, coworkers and some allies in the
International Socialist Organization and Iraq Veterans Against the
War (IVAW). At any given time, at least 18 people were chanting and
raising placards or banners.

Activists lined the space where people enter the union. As a result,
people entering went around the recruiters. When a right-winger began
to overpower antiwar activists' chanting with his yelling, a
representative of the administration asked protesters to stop. We
agreed to a compromise in which we'd pause chanting for at least an
hour, and then we'd resume.

As a new round of chants started up, members of the IVAW arrived.
They immediately unfurled their IVAW banner and stood behind the Marines.

One of the Marine recruiters turned around and said, "We're not Iraq
veterans." Bryan Casler, a former Marine and IVAW member, replied,
"But we are." Within five to 10 minutes, the recruiters were out the door.

This article was first published on TheSitch.com.
http://www.thesitch.com/

.

Sexual trauma afflicts 15 pct of U.S. veterans

Sexual trauma afflicts 15 pct of U.S. veterans

http://www.reuters.com/article/asiaCrisis/idUSN27312542

Tue Oct 28, 2008
By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Editor

WASHINGTON, Oct 28 (Reuters) - Nearly 15 percent of Iraq and
Afghanistan veterans seeking medical care from the U.S. Veterans
Affairs Department have suffered sexual trauma, from harassment to
rape, researchers reported on Tuesday.

And these veterans were 1.5 times as likely as other veterans to need
mental health services, the report from the VA found.

"We are, in fact, detecting men and women who seem to have a
significant need for mental health services," said Rachel Kimerling
of the National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder at the VA
Palo Alto Health Care System in California.

The study, presented at a meeting of the American Public Health
Association in San Diego, raises many questions.

Kimerling said in a telephone interview the term "military sexual
trauma" covers a range of events from coerced sex to outright rape or
threatening and unwelcome sexual advances.

Kimerling said for her purposes it is not necessary to find out what
kind of sexual trauma occurred. Her study also did not determine when
it happened.

"If you think about military service where you are living and working
so closely with the same people, that even if it is not sexual
assault ... it is possible that severe sexual harassment is just as
traumatic," she said.

The study does not cover active-duty servicemen and women, as VA
services are only available to discharged veterans.

A spokeswoman for the VA said about 40 percent of all discharged
veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan have sought medical care
of some sort from the VA, which has a universal screening program for
military sexual trauma.

Kimerling said that may mean many veterans are unaware they can be
helped and she said she hoped more would come forward to seek treatment.

"There are dedicated health care services for military sexual trauma
at every VA facility across the nation," she said.

Sexual trauma can lead to depression, anxiety, substance abuse and
post-traumatic stress disorder, Kimerling said.

"We know there are effective, evidence-based treatments for them that
are used in VA," she added.

Most veterans who were affected were women, with more than one in
seven women seeking health care services of some sort also reporting
sexual trauma. Just under 1 percent of male veterans also reported
military sexual trauma.

.